Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Heise, A., Thieme, S. Zur De-Pluralisierung der Wirtschaftswissenschaft nach 1970: Explorationen in einem wissenschaftlichen Macht- und Kampffeld. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 135(2), 155-187. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.135.2.155
Heise, Arne and Thieme, Sebastian "Zur De-Pluralisierung der Wirtschaftswissenschaft nach 1970: Explorationen in einem wissenschaftlichen Macht- und Kampffeld" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 135.2, 2015, 155-187. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.135.2.155
Heise, Arne/Thieme, Sebastian (2015): Zur De-Pluralisierung der Wirtschaftswissenschaft nach 1970: Explorationen in einem wissenschaftlichen Macht- und Kampffeld, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 135, iss. 2, 155-187, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.135.2.155

Format

Zur De-Pluralisierung der Wirtschaftswissenschaft nach 1970: Explorationen in einem wissenschaftlichen Macht- und Kampffeld

Heise, Arne | Thieme, Sebastian

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 135 (2015), Iss. 2 : pp. 155–187

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Arne Heise, Universität Hamburg, Zentrum für ökonomische und soziologische Studien, VMP 9, 20146 Hamburg, Germany

Sebastian Thieme, Universität Hamburg, Zentrum für ökonomische und soziologische Studien, VMP 9, 20146 Hamburg, Germany

Cited By

  1. Nach der Krise ist vor der Krise

    Egerer, Elsa

    Sagvosdkin, Valentin

    Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen, Vol. 34 (2021), Iss. 4 P.699

    https://doi.org/10.1515/fjsb-2021-0067 [Citations: 0]

Abstract

In the context of ongoing criticisms of the lack of pluralism in economics, the present article aims to discuss the development of ’heterodox" economics since the 1970s. Following Lakatos"s concept of scientific research programs (srp), and concentrating on the situation in Germany, the article will discuss classifications of economics, and will specify the understanding of diversity in the light of ’axiomatic variations" of the economic mainstream. This will form the basis for the subsequent description of the development of heterodoxy in Germany, with special reference to the founding of new universities and the reform movements in the 1970s. It can be shown that the heterodox scene flourished in this period, but that this pluralization remained fragmented and short-lived; by the 1980s at the latest heterodoxy was again on its way to marginalization. The history of heterodoxy in Germany thus presents itself as an unequal ’battle of the paradigms," and can only be told as the story of a failure.