Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Horn, K., Kolev, S., Levy, D., Peart, S. Liberalism in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Colloque Walter Lippmann. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 139(2–4), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.177
Horn, Karen; Kolev, Stefan; Levy, David M. and Peart, Sandra J. "Liberalism in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Colloque Walter Lippmann" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 139.2–4, 2019, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.177
Horn, Karen/Kolev, Stefan/Levy, David M./Peart, Sandra J. (2019): Liberalism in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Colloque Walter Lippmann, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 139, iss. 2–4, 177-188, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.177

Format

Liberalism in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Colloque Walter Lippmann

Horn, Karen | Kolev, Stefan | Levy, David M. | Peart, Sandra J.

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 139 (2019), Iss. 2–4 : pp. 177–188

5 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Horn, Karen, Faculty of Economics, Law and Social Sciences, University of Erfurt. Nordhäuser Str. 63, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.

Kolev, Stefan, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Applied Sciences Zwickau. Kornmarkt 1, 08056 Zwickau, Germany.

Levy, David M., Department of Economics, The Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University. 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

Peart, Sandra J., Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond. 410 Westhampton Way, Richmond, VA 23173, USA.

Cited By

  1. Utilitarian and Ideological Determinants of Attitudes towards Immigration: Germany Before and After the “Migration Crisis”

    Welsch, Heinz

    Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 141 (2021), Iss. 3 P.215

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.3.215 [Citations: 0]
  2. Coining Neoliberalism: Interwar Germany and the Neglected Origins of a Pejorative Moniker

    Magness, Phillip W.

    Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 141 (2021), Iss. 3 P.189

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.3.189 [Citations: 1]
  3. WHEN LIBERTY PRESUPPOSES ORDER: F. A. HAYEK’S CONTEXTUAL ORDOLIBERALISM

    Kolev, Stefan

    Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. (2023), Iss. P.1

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837223000214 [Citations: 2]
  4. Why Are So Many Western Intellectuals Abandoning Liberalism and What Can We Do About It?

    Craiutu, Aurelian

    Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 142 (2022), Iss. 1 P.1

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.142.1.1 [Citations: 1]
  5. Ordoliberalism and European Economic Policy – Between Realpolitik and Economic Utopia

    Horn, Karen

    ORDO, Vol. 71 (2020), Iss. 1 P.377

    https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2021-0020 [Citations: 1]

References

  1. Atkinson, A. B. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  2. Audier, S. 2012. Néo-libéralisme(s): Une archéologie intellectuelle. Paris: Bernard Grasset.  Google Scholar
  3. Beck, T. and H.-H. Kotz, eds. 2017. Ordoliberalism: A German Oddity? London: CEPR Press.  Google Scholar
  4. Berggren, N. and M. Elinder. 2012. “Tolerance and Growth: Modeling the Empirical Relationship.” Public Choice 153 (3): 495 – 502.  Google Scholar
  5. Berggren, N. and T. Nilsson. 2013. “Does Economic Freedom Foster Tolerance?” Kyklos 66 (2): 177 – 207.  Google Scholar
  6. Biebricher, T. 2015. “Neoliberalism and Democracy.” Constellations 22 (2): 255 – 66.  Google Scholar
  7. Biebricher, T. 2019. The Political Theory of Neoliberalism. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.  Google Scholar
  8. Biebricher, T. 2020. “Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism.” Global Perspectives 1 (1): 1 – 18.  Google Scholar
  9. Biebricher, T. and F. Vogelmann, eds. 2017. The Birth of Austerity: German Ordoliberalism and Contemporary Neoliberalism. London: Rowman & Littlefield.  Google Scholar
  10. Blyth, M. 2013. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  11. Boettke, P. J. 2018. F. A. Hayek: Economics, Political Economy and Social Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  12. Bonefeld, W. 2017. The Strong State and the Free Economy. London: Rowman & Littlefield.  Google Scholar
  13. Bruff, I. 2014. “The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism.” Rethinking Marxism 26 (1): 113 – 29.  Google Scholar
  14. Brunnermeier, M., H. James, and J.-P. Landau. 2016. The Euro and the Battle of Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  15. Burgin, A. 2012. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  16. Craiutu, A. 2016. Faces of Moderation: The Art of Balance in an Age of Extremes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Dekker, E. 2016. The Viennese Students of Civilization: The Meaning and Context of Austrian Economics Reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  18. Denord, F. 2001. “Aux origines du néo-libéralisme en France: Louis Rougier et le Colloque Walter Lippmann de 1938.” Le Mouvement Social 195: 9 – 34.  Google Scholar
  19. Dold, M. and T. Krieger, eds. 2020. Ordoliberalism and European Economic Policy: Between Realpolitik and Economic Utopia. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  20. Feld, L. P., E. A. Köhler, and D. Nientiedt. 2015. “Ordoliberalism, Pragmatism and the Eurozone Crisis.” European Review of International Studies 2 (3): 48 – 61.  Google Scholar
  21. Gauck, J. 2015. “Rede des Bundespräsidenten anlässlich der Festveranstaltung zum 60-jährigen Bestehen des Walter Eucken Instituts am 16. Januar 2014 in Freiburg.” In Zur Zukunft der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft, edited by L. P. Feld, 33 – 43. Freiburg: Herder.  Google Scholar
  22. Goldschmidt, N. 2013. “Walter Eucken’s Place in the History of Ideas.” Review of Austrian Economics 26 (2): 127 – 47.  Google Scholar
  23. Goldschmidt, N. and H. Rauchenschwandtner. 2018. “The Philosophy of Social Market Economy: Michel Foucault’s Analysis of Ordoliberalism.” Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 138 (2): 157 – 84.  Google Scholar
  24. Goldschmidt, N. and J.-O. Hesse. 2013. “Eucken, Hayek and ‘The Road to Serfdom.’” In Hayek: A Collaborative Biography. Part 1: Influences from Mises to Bartley, edited by R. Leeson, 123 – 46. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  25. Goldschmidt, N. and M. Wohlgemuth. 2008. “Social Market Economy: Origins, Meanings and Interpretations.” Constitutional Political Economy 19 (3): 261 – 76.  Google Scholar
  26. Goldschmidt, N., G. Wegner, M. Wohlgemuth, and J. Zweynert. 2009. “Was ist und was kann Ordnungsökonomik?” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung June 19, 2009, 12.  Google Scholar
  27. Goodwin, C. D. 2014. Walter Lippmann: Public Economist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  28. Hagemann, H. 2017. “Ordoliberalism, the Social Market Economy and Keynesianism in Germany 1945 – 1974.” In Liberalism and the Welfare State: Economists and Arguments for the Welfare State, edited by R. E. Backhouse, B. W. Bateman, T. Nishizawa, and D. Plehwe, 57 – 74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  29. Hartwell, R. M. 1995. A History of the Mont Pelerin Society. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  30. Heller, H. 2015. “Authoritarian Liberalism.” European Law Journal 21 (3): 295 – 301.  Google Scholar
  31. Hien, J. and C. Joerges, eds. 2017. Ordoliberalism, Law and the Rule of Economics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.  Google Scholar
  32. Horn, K. 2010. Die Soziale Marktwirtschaft: Alles, was Sie über den Neoliberalismus wissen sollten. Frankfurt: FAZ Buch.  Google Scholar
  33. Horn, K. 2020. “Me, the People: Under the Sway of Populist Leaders.” In Imagining Europe: Essays on the Past, Present, & Future of the European Union, chapter 7, edited by H. T. Edmondson III and P. C. Mentzel. Lanham: Lexington Books, forthcoming.  Google Scholar
  34. Karlson, N. 2018. Statecraft and Liberal Reform in Advanced Democracies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  35. Kolev, S. 2018. “Paleo- and Neoliberals: Ludwig von Mises and the ‘Ordo-interventionists’.” In Wilhelm Röpke (1899 – 1966): A Liberal Political Economist and Conservative Social Philosopher, edited by P. Commun and S. Kolev, 65 – 90. Cham: Springer.  Google Scholar
  36. Kolev, S. 2019. “James Buchanan and the ‘New Economics of Order’ Research Program.” In James M. Buchanan: A Theorist of Political Economy and Social Philosophy, edited by R. E. Wagner, 85 – 108. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  37. Kolev, S. and N. Goldschmidt. 2018. “Neoliberalism as the Ideology of Depolitization? Eucken and Hayek Reconsidered.” ORDO Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 69: 518 – 22.  Google Scholar
  38. Kolev, S., N. Goldschmidt, and J.-O. Hesse. 2020. “Debating Liberalism: Walter Eucken, F. A. Hayek and the Early History of the Mont Pèlerin Society.” Review of Austrian Economics, forthcoming.  Google Scholar
  39. Mirowski, P. and D. Plehwe, eds. 2009. The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  40. Müller, J.-W. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  Google Scholar
  41. Müller-Armack, A. 1965. “The Principles of the Social Market Economy.” German Economic Review 3 (2): 89 – 104.  Google Scholar
  42. Müller-Armack, A. 1973. “Die wissenschaftlichen Ursprünge der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft.” In Genealogie der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft, edited by A. Müller-Armack, 176 – 84. Bern: Paul Haupt.  Google Scholar
  43. Peck, J. 2014. Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  44. Plickert, P. 2008. Wandlungen des Neoliberalismus. Eine Studie zur Entwicklung und Ausstrahlung der “Mont Pèlerin Society”. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.  Google Scholar
  45. Reinhoudt, J. and S. Audier 2018. The Walter Lippmann Colloquium: The Birth of Neo-Liberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  46. Schnellenbach, J. 2015. “Does Classical Liberalism Imply an Evolutionary Approach to Policy-Making?” Journal of Bioeconomics 17 (1): 53 – 70.  Google Scholar
  47. Slobodian, Q. 2018. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  48. Stiglitz, J. E. 2012. The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. New York: W.W. Norton.  Google Scholar
  49. Wasserman, J. 2019. The Marginal Revolutionaries: How Austrian Economists Fought the War of Ideas. New Haven: Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  50. Wegmann, M. 2002. Früher Neoliberalismus und europäische Integration: Interdependenz der nationalen, supranationalen und internationalen Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft (1932 – 1965). Baden-Baden: Nomos.  Google Scholar
  51. Wilkinson, M. A. 2013. “The Spectre of Authoritarian Liberalism: Reflections on the Constitutional Crisis of the European Union.” German Law Journal 14 (5): 527 – 60.  Google Scholar
  52. Wilkinson, M. A. 2018. “Authoritarian Liberalism as Authoritarian Constitutionalism.” LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers 18/2018.  Google Scholar
  53. Wohlgemuth, M. 2002. “Evolutionary Approaches to Politics.” Kyklos 55 (2): 223 – 46.  Google Scholar
  54. Wohlgemuth, M. 2013. “The Freiburg School and the Hayekian Challenge.” Review of Austrian Economics 26 (2): 149 – 70.  Google Scholar
  55. Zweynert, J. 2013. “How German is German Neo-Liberalism?” Review of Austrian Economics 26 (2): 109 – 25.  Google Scholar