Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Dilger, A., Tolsdorf, F. Doping und Wettbewerbsintensität. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 130(1), 95-115. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.130.1.95
Dilger, Alexander and Tolsdorf, Frank "Doping und Wettbewerbsintensität" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 130.1, 2010, 95-115. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.130.1.95
Dilger, Alexander/Tolsdorf, Frank (2010): Doping und Wettbewerbsintensität, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 130, iss. 1, 95-115, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.130.1.95

Format

Doping und Wettbewerbsintensität

Dilger, Alexander | Tolsdorf, Frank

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 130 (2010), Iss. 1 : pp. 95–115

4 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Alexander Dilger, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Institut für Ökonomische Bildung und Centrum für Management, Scharnhorststraße 100, 48151 Münster.

Frank Tolsdorf, Fakultät für Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Zahnklinik Private Universität Witten / Herdecke gGmbH, Alfred-Herrhausen-Straße 45, 58448 Witten.

Cited By

  1. Doping in Teams: A Simple Decision Theoretic Model

    Dilger, Alexander

    SSRN Electronic Journal , Vol. (2017), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3036903 [Citations: 0]
  2. Sport in Kultur und Gesellschaft

    Ökonomische Theorien des Doping-Phänomens

    Emrich, Eike | Meyer, Tim | Pierdzioch, Christian

    2018

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53385-7_7-1 [Citations: 0]
  3. Sport in Kultur und Gesellschaft

    Ökonomische Theorien des Doping-Phänomens

    Emrich, Eike | Meyer, Tim | Pierdzioch, Christian

    2021

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53407-6_7 [Citations: 0]
  4. Erfolg(+)reich und verdorben?

    Frenger, Monika | Pitsch, Werner | Emrich, Eike

    Sportwissenschaft, Vol. 42 (2012), Iss. 3 P.188

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-012-0262-8 [Citations: 10]

Abstract

There are systematic incentives to dope within the structure of sports tournaments. A simple decision theory model demonstrates the nature of these incentives and the circumstances in which they are particularly strong. From this model, some empirically testable hypotheses are derived. The most important one, that greater competition between athletes induces more doping, is corroborated by comparing the competitiveness and number of caught dopers in thirteen different athletic sports. The lack of other significant findings may be explained by the decisive role of competitiveness which is more powerful than all other effects and is also a central element of them.

Received: May 10, 2009

Accepted: November 26, 2009