Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

von Hagen, J. Geldmengensteuerung mit stochastischem Operationsziel. . Zur Interpretation der Politik des Federal Reserve Board seit 1982. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 21(3), 346-362. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.21.3.346
von Hagen, Jürgen "Geldmengensteuerung mit stochastischem Operationsziel. Zur Interpretation der Politik des Federal Reserve Board seit 1982. " Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 21.3, 1988, 346-362. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.21.3.346
von Hagen, Jürgen (1988): Geldmengensteuerung mit stochastischem Operationsziel, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 21, iss. 3, 346-362, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.21.3.346

Format

Geldmengensteuerung mit stochastischem Operationsziel

Zur Interpretation der Politik des Federal Reserve Board seit 1982

von Hagen, Jürgen

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 21 (1988), Iss. 3 : pp. 346–362

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Dr. Jürgen von Hagen, School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indianapolis, U.S.A.

References

  1. Davis, G., (1971): Short Run Targets for Open Market Operations. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Open Market Policies and Operating Procedures, Staff Studies, Washington.  Google Scholar
  2. De Rosa, P. und H. Stern, (1977): Monetary Control and the Federal Funds Rate. Journal of Monetary Economics 3, S. 217 - 230.  Google Scholar
  3. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, (1986), Monetary Policy and Open Market Operations in 1985. Quarterly Review 11, S. 34 - 53.  Google Scholar
  4. Gilbert, R. A., (1985): Operating Procedures for Conducting Monetary Policy. Fed. Res. Bank of St. Louis Review 67, Februar S. 13 - 21.  Google Scholar
  5. von Hagen, J., (1986): Strategien kurzfristiger Geldmengensteuerung. Hamburg.  Google Scholar
  6. Heinemann, H. E., (1987): Ripple Effects of Fed Policy, New York, Journal of Commerce, 26. 2.  Google Scholar
  7. Johannes, J. M. und R. H. Rasche, (1981): Can the Reserves Approach to Monetary Control Really Work?, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 13, S. 293 - 313.  Google Scholar
  8. Levin, F. J. und P. Meek, (1981): Implementing the New Procedures: The View from the Trading Desk. Board of Gov. of the Fed. Res. System, New Monetary Control Procedures, Staff Studies, Washington.  Google Scholar
  9. Partian, J. C., K. Hamdani und K. M. Camilli, (1986): Reserves Forecasting for Open Market Operations. Fed. Res. Bank of New York Quarterly Review 11, Januar S. 19 - 33.  Google Scholar
  10. Roley, V. V., (1986): Market Perceptions of U.S. Monetary Policy Since 1982. Fed. Res. Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review 71, Mai S. 27 -40.  Google Scholar
  11. Roth, H. L., (1986): Federal Reserve Open Market Techniques. Fed. Res. Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review, März S. 3 - 15.  Google Scholar
  12. Thornton, D. L. (1986): The Discount Rate and Market Interest Rates: Theory and Evidence. Fed. Res. Bank of St. Louis, Review 68 Juli, S. 5 - 21.  Google Scholar
  13. Wallich, H. W., (1984): Recent Techniques of Monetary Policy. Fed. Res. Bank of Kansas City, Economic Review 69, Mai S. 21 - 30.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Money Supply Management with a Stochastic Money Supply Target

Two salient features are characteristic of US monetary policy in the last ten years. After some years of money supply management attempted via short-term interest rate targets, the Federal Reserve Board switched to a management regime in October 1979 focusing on the short-term control of unutilized reserves. In October 1982 a new regime was adopted in which orientational targets have so far played a greater role for the refinancing of loan positions. In the monetary policy discussion on the current regime two different forms of interpretation have emerged. Some authors understand the current regime as the return to short-term interest rate targets, whilst others equate the importance of targets for the refinancing of loan positions with that of previous targets for unutilized reserves. However, both interpretations are unsatisfactory insofar as they are bound to suppose a priori that the Fed has chosen a suboptimal procedure for managing interest rates or money supply. This contribution develops an alternative interpretation avoiding this weakness. The starting point is the observation that the Fed faces a lack of information in the management of money supply via unutilized reserves that has generally been ignored in the presentation of this regime: for institutional reasons the holdings of unutilized reserves currently escape observation. Making optimal use of the information available to the Fed leads to a control regime aiming, as before, at short-term targets for unutilized reserves, which may become a sub-optimal procedure in money supply management via short-term interest rate or refinancing targets.