Menu Expand

Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Der Betriebswirt
  4. Vol. 55, Issue 1
  5. pp. 32–36

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Wendler, R. Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Der Betriebswirt, 55(1), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.55.1.32
Wendler, Roy "Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre" Der Betriebswirt 55.1, 2014, 32-36. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.55.1.32
Wendler, Roy (2014): Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre, in: Der Betriebswirt, vol. 55, iss. 1, 32-36, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.55.1.32
Format
Download

Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre

Wendler, Roy

Der Betriebswirt, Vol. 55 (2014), Iss. 1 : pp. 32–36

2 Citations (CrossRef)

Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot, Deutscher Betriebswirte Verlag
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.55.1.32
Language
German
Pages
5
Keywords

Pricing

Individual
€ 26.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Dipl.-Wirt.-Inf. Roy Wendler, Technische Universität Dresden, Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften - Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik, insb. Informationssysteme in Industrie und Handel.

  • Roy Wendler studierte Wirtschaftsinformatik an der TU Dresden und ist seit 2008 Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am Lehrstuhl für Wirtschaftsinformatik, insb. Informationssysteme in Industrie und Handel. Im Rahmen seiner Forschungsaktivitäten und Promotion beschäftigt er sich mit den Themen Reifegradmodelle sowie mit agilem Projektmanagement und agilen Unternehmen.
  • Email
  • Search in Google Scholar

Cited By

  1. PPS-Aufgaben im Kontext des Industrie-4.0-Reifegrads

    Bach, Thies | Fischer, Markus | Schuh, Günther | Schröer, Tobias

    ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, Vol. 115 (2020), Iss. 9 P.641

    https://doi.org/10.3139/104.112403 [Citations: 0]

  2. Disruptive Technologien im Mittelstand

    Reifegradmanagement des Produktentwicklungsprozesses von Produkten auf Basis disruptiver Technologien

    Janke, Angela | Burkhardt, Nicolas

    2018

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17137-7_6 [Citations: 0]

References

  1. Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, J. (2009). Developing Maturity Models for IT Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213–222. doi:10.1007/s12599-009-0044-5  Google Scholar
  2. Cooke-Davies, T. (2007). Project management maturity models. In P. W. G. Morris & J. K. Pinto (Eds.), The WILEY GUIDE to Project Organization & Project Management Competencies (pp. 290–311). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.  Google Scholar
  3. Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain. New York: McGraw-Hill.  Google Scholar
  4. Dudenredaktion. (2011). Duden: Deutsches Universalwörterbuch (7th ed.). Mannheim: Duden.  Google Scholar
  5. Gottschalk, P., & Solli-Sæther, H. (2009). Towards a stage theory for industrial management research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(9), 1264–1273. doi:10.1108/02635570911002315  Google Scholar
  6. Jugdev, K., & Thomas, J. (2002). Project Management Maturity Models: The SIlver Bullets of Competitive Advantage? Project Management Journal, 33(4), 4–14.  Google Scholar
  7. Klimko, G. (2001). Knowledge management and maturity models: building common understanding. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 269–278).  Google Scholar
  8. Kohoutek, H. J. (1996). Reflections on the Capability and Maturity Models of Engineering Processes. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 12, 147–155.  Google Scholar
  9. Kwak, Y. H., & Ibbs, C. W. (2000). Calculating Project Management’s Return on Investment. Project Management Journal, 31(2), 38–47.  Google Scholar
  10. Lahti, M., Shamsuzzoha, A. H. M., & Helo, P. (2009). Developing a maturity model for Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 5(6), 654–678.  Google Scholar
  11. Lockamy III, A., & McCormack, K. (2004). The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(4), 272–278. doi:10.1108/13598540410550019  Google Scholar
  12. Lyytinen, K. (1991). Penetration of Information Technology in Organizations: A Comparative Study Using Stage Models and Transaction Costs. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 3(1), 87–109.  Google Scholar
  13. McBride, T. (2010). Organisational theory perspective on process capability measurement scales. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice, 22, 243–254. doi:10.1002/spip  Google Scholar
  14. McRoberts, H. A., & Sloan, B. C. (1998). Financial Management Capability Model. International Journal of Government Auditing, 25(3), 8–11.  Google Scholar
  15. Nolan, R. L. (1979). Managing the crises in data processing. Harvard Business Review, 57, 115–127.  Google Scholar
  16. Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Pittsburgh, PA.  Google Scholar
  17. Project Management Institute. (2008). Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3®) (2nd ed.). Newton Square, PA.  Google Scholar
  18. Pullen, W. (2007). A Public Sector HPT Maturity Model. Performance Improvement, 46(4), 9–15. doi:10.1002/pfi  Google Scholar
  19. Shewhart, W. A. (1931). Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  20. Simpson, J. A., & Weiner, E. S. C. (1989). The Oxford English Dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Software Engineering Institute. (2010). CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3. Pittsburgh, PA.  Google Scholar
  22. Stachowiak, H. (1973). Allgemeine Modelltheorie. Wien: Springer.  Google Scholar
  23. van Grembergen, W., & Saull, R. (2001). Aligning Business and Information Technology through the Balanced Scorecard at a Major Canadian Financial Group: its Status Measured with an IT BSC Maturity Model. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 00, pp. 1–10).  Google Scholar
  24. Wendler, R. (2012). The maturity of maturity model research: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 54(12), 1317–1339. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.07.007  Google Scholar

Abstract

Maturity models are management tools, which are mainly applied in Information Systems and Informatics. However, their roots are to be found in Business Administration, particularly in Quality Management. Therefore, the following article aims at introducing the concept of maturity models from a linguistic, an application-based, and a structural perspective prior to exemplarily presenting potential application domains in management and business administration.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Roy Wendler: Reifegradmodelle: Anwendungspotenziale in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre 32
Summary 32
1 Einleitung 32
2 Entstehung 32
3 Grundlegende Konzepte 33
3.1 Linguistische Perspektive: Begriffliche Grundlagen 33
3.2 Anwendungsbezogene Perspektive: Nutzen und Verwendung 33
3.3 Strukturelle Perspektive: Struktur und Bestandteile 34
3.4 Zusammenführung 34
4 Potenzielle Einsatzgebiete in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre 35
4.1 Projektmanagement 35
4.2 Supply Chain Management 35
4.3 Controlling und Finanzen 36
4.4 Kritische Würdigung 36
Literatur 36

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.