Menu Expand

How does banking diversity fit in the general vision inspiring the joint process of Banking Union and Capital Markets Union?

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung
  4. Vol. 87, Issue 4
  5. pp. 25–37

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Ferri, G., Neuberger, D. How does banking diversity fit in the general vision inspiring the joint process of Banking Union and Capital Markets Union?. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 87(4), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.4.25
Ferri, Giovanni and Neuberger, Doris "How does banking diversity fit in the general vision inspiring the joint process of Banking Union and Capital Markets Union?" Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 87.4, 2018, 25-37. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.4.25
Ferri, Giovanni/Neuberger, Doris (2018): How does banking diversity fit in the general vision inspiring the joint process of Banking Union and Capital Markets Union?, in: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 87, iss. 4, 25-37, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.4.25
Format
Download

How does banking diversity fit in the general vision inspiring the joint process of Banking Union and Capital Markets Union?

Ferri, Giovanni | Neuberger, Doris

Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 87 (2018), Iss. 4 : pp. 25–37

2 Citations (CrossRef)

Read Now Download (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.87.4.25
Language
English
Pages
13
Keywords

Author Details

Giovanni Ferri, Lumsa University, Rome, Center for Relationship Banking & Economics (CERBE), Rome.

Doris Neuberger, University of Rostock, Center for Relationship Banking & Economics (CERBE), Rome, German Institute for Economic Research (DIW).

Cited By

  1. Diversity in banking and new firm formation. Insights from the Italian local credit markets

    Errico, Lucia | Rondinella, Sandro | Trivieri, Francesco

    International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 91 (2024), Iss. P.1095

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.005 [Citations: 0]

  2. Banking diversity and firms’ exit: A study on Italian data

    Costanzo, Giuseppina Damiana | Succurro, Marianna | Trivieri, Francesco

    Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 33 (2023), Iss. 5 P.1537

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-023-00836-4 [Citations: 1]

References

  1. Agarwal, S., and R. Hauswald (2010): Distance and private information in lending. Reviewof Financial Studies, 23, 2757–2788.  Google Scholar
  2. Alessandrini, P., M. Fratianni and A. Zazzaro (eds.) (2009): The changing geography of banking and finance. New York.  Google Scholar
  3. Allen, F., and D. Gale (2000): Comparing Financial Systems. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  4. Amable, B. (2003): The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  5. Amidžić, G., A. Massara and A. Mialou (2014): Assessing Countries’ Financial Inclusion Standing—A New Composite Index. IMF Working Papers 14/36. Washington, D. C., International Monetary Fund.  Google Scholar
  6. Ayadi, R., G. Ferri and V. Pesic (2018): Does Business Model Instability Imperil Banks’Soundness? Evidence from Europe. Bancaria, 7-8, 22–47.  Google Scholar
  7. Ayadi, R., D. T. Llewellyn, R. H. Schmidt, E. Arbak, and W. P. De Groen (2010): Investigating Diversity in the Banking Sector in Europe. Key Developments, Performance and Role of Cooperative Banks. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.  Google Scholar
  8. Bartoli, F., G. Ferri, P. Murro and Z. Rotondi (2013): SME financing and the choice of lending technology in Italy: Complementarity or substitutability? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 5476–5485.  Google Scholar
  9. Bharath, S. T., S. Dahiya, A. Saunders and A. Srinivasan (2011): Lending Relationships and Loan Contract Terms. The Review of Financial Studies, 24 (4), 1141–1203. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp064  Google Scholar
  10. Bikker, J. A. and K. Haaf (2002): Measures of Competition and Concentration in the Banking Industry: A Review of the Literature. Economic & Financial Modelling, Summer 2002, Central Bank of the Netherlands.  Google Scholar
  11. BMZ/IFC/CGAP (2011): Advancing Responsible Finance for Greater Development Impact 2011. Consultation Draft. 27 January, German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), International Finance Corporation (IFC), Washington, D. C.  Google Scholar
  12. Brunnermeier, M. K., L. Garicano, P. R. Lane, M. Pagano, R. Reis, T. Santos, D. Thesmar, S. Van Nieuwerburgh and D. Vayanos (2016): The sovereign-bank diabolic loop and ESBies. American Economic Review, 106 (5), 508–512.  Google Scholar
  13. Coccorese, P., and S. Shaffer (2018): Cooperative banks and local economic growth. CAMA Working Paper 11/2018. Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Australian National University.  Google Scholar
  14. Conrad, A., A. Hoffmann and D. Neuberger (2018): Physische und digitale Erreichbarkeit von Finanzdienstleistungen der Sparkassen und Genossenschaftsbanken. Review of Regional Research, 38 (2), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-018-0121-7  Google Scholar
  15. ECB (2017): Report on financial structures. October 2017. European Central Bank.  Google Scholar
  16. ECB (2018): Banking Union. www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/about/bankingunion/html/index.en.html (retrieved 15.10.2019).  Google Scholar
  17. EU Commission (2005a): Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Common Actions for Growth and Employment: The Community Lisbon Programme. Brussels, 20.7.2005 COM(2005) 330 final.  Google Scholar
  18. EU Commission (2005b): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—European values in the globalised world—Contribution of the Commission to the October Meeting of Heads of State and Government. Brussels, 3.11.2005, COM(2005) 525 final/2.  Google Scholar
  19. EU Commission (2007): Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007. Official Journal of the European Union, 2007/C 306/01.  Google Scholar
  20. EU Commission (2012): A Roadmap towards a Banking Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels.  Google Scholar
  21. EU Commission (2015): Building a Capital Markets Union. Green Paper.  Google Scholar
  22. EU Commission (2018): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament,the European Council, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth. Brussels, 8.3.2018, COM/2018/097 final.  Google Scholar
  23. EU Parliament (2008): European Parliament resolution of 5 June 2008 on Competition:Sector inquiry on retail banking (2007/2201(INI)). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2008-0260+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN  Google Scholar
  24. Ferri, G. (2017): The Evolution of Banking Regulation in the Post-Crisis Period: Cooperative and Savings Banks’ Perspective. In: E. Miklaszewska (ed.): Institutional Diversity in Banking. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 1–31.  Google Scholar
  25. Ferri, G., and P. Kalmi (2014): Only up: Regulatory burden and its effects on credit unions. Filene Research Institute report.  Google Scholar
  26. Ferri, G., P. Kalmi and E. Kerola (2014): Does bank ownership affect lending behavior? Evidence from the Euro area. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 194–209.  Google Scholar
  27. Ferri, G., and D. Neuberger (2014): The Banking Regulatory Bubble and How to Get out of It. Rivista di Politica Economica, Issue 2, 39–69.  Google Scholar
  28. Ferri, G., and G. Pesce (2012): The Perverse Effects of Compliance Costs for the Local Cooperative Banks. In: J. Heiskanen, H. Henrÿ, P. Hytinkoski and T. KöPpä (eds.): New Opportunities for Co-operatives: New Opportunities for People. Proceedings of the 2011 ICA Global Research Conference, 24–27 August 2011, Mikkeli, Finland, University of Helsinki Ruralia Institute, November 2012.  Google Scholar
  29. Flögel, F., and S. Gärtner (2018): The Banking Systems of Germany, the UK and Spain from a Spatial Perspective: Lessons Learned and What Is to Be Done? IAT Discussion Paper 18/1A.  Google Scholar
  30. Hakenes, H., I. Hasan, P. Molyneux and R. Xie (2015): Small Banks and Local Economic Development. Review of Finance, 19, 653–683.  Google Scholar
  31. Hall, P. A., and D. Soskice (eds.) (2001): Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  32. Kotz, H.-H., and D. Schäfer (2017a): Can the Capital Markets Union Deliver? Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 86 (2), 89–98.  Google Scholar
  33. Kotz, H.-H., and D. Schäfer (2017b): EU Capital Markets Union: An Alluring Opportunity or a Blind Alley? The Macro-Perspective: CMU and Risk-Sharing. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 86 (1), 5–7.  Google Scholar
  34. Lisbon European Council (2000): Presidency Conclusions. 23 and 24 March 2000. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm  Google Scholar
  35. Michie, J. and C. Oughton (2013): Measuring Diversity in Financial Services Markets: A Diversity Index. SOAS. Discussion Paper No. 113. University of London, Centre for Financial and Management Studies.  Google Scholar
  36. Nogler, L., and U. Reifner (eds.) (2014): Life Time Contracts. Social Long-term Contracts in Labour, Tenancy and Consumer Credit Law. The Hague, Eleven International Publishing.  Google Scholar
  37. Pew Research Center (2014): Inequality Report. downloaded 8/1/2016 at: www.pewglobal.org/files/2014/10/Pew-Research-Center-Inequality-Report-FINAL-October-17-2014.pdf.  Google Scholar
  38. Prieg, L., and T. Greenham (2012): Stakeholder Banks - Benefits of banking diversity,nef (the new economics foundation). London. https://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/e0b3bd-2b9423abfec8_pem6i6six.pdf  Google Scholar
  39. Reifner, U. (2018): Responsible Credit in European Law. The Italian Law Journal, 4 (2),421–448.  Google Scholar
  40. Rodrigues, M. J. (2009): The European Lisbon Agenda and National Diversity: Key Issues for Policy-Making. Chapter 8 in Europe, Globalization and the Lisbon Agenda, 2009 from Edward Elgar Publishing.  Google Scholar
  41. Schwartz, M., T. F. Dapp, G. W. Beck and A. Khussainova (2017): Deutschlands Banken schalten bei Filialschließungen einen Gang höher – Herkulesaufgabe Digitalisierung. KfW Research, Fokus Volkswirtschaft Nr. 181. 8. Oktober 2017.  Google Scholar
  42. Alessandrini, P., M. Fratianni and A. Zazzaro (eds.) (2009): The changing geography of banking and finance. New York.  Google Scholar
  43. Agarwal, S., and R. Hauswald (2010): Distance and private information in lending. Reviewof Financial Studies, 23, 2757–2788.  Google Scholar
  44. Schwartz, M., T. F. Dapp, G. W. Beck and A. Khussainova (2017): Deutschlands Banken schalten bei Filialschließungen einen Gang höher – Herkulesaufgabe Digitalisierung. KfW Research, Fokus Volkswirtschaft Nr. 181. 8. Oktober 2017.  Google Scholar
  45. Rodrigues, M. J. (2009): The European Lisbon Agenda and National Diversity: Key Issues for Policy-Making. Chapter 8 in Europe, Globalization and the Lisbon Agenda, 2009 from Edward Elgar Publishing.  Google Scholar
  46. Allen, F., and D. Gale (2000): Comparing Financial Systems. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  47. Ferri, G., and G. Pesce (2012): The Perverse Effects of Compliance Costs for the Local Cooperative Banks. In: J. Heiskanen, H. Henry¨, P. Hytinkoski and T. Ko¨Ppa¨ (eds.): New Opportunities for Co-operatives: New Opportunities for People. Proceedings of the 2011 ICA Global Research Conference, 24–27 August 2011, Mikkeli, Finland, University of Helsinki Ruralia Institute, November 2012.  Google Scholar
  48. Hakenes, H., I. Hasan, P. Molyneux and R. Xie (2015): Small Banks and Local Economic Development. Review of Finance, 19, 653–683.  Google Scholar
  49. Hall, P. A., and D. Soskice (eds.) (2001): Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  50. Kotz, H.-H., and D. Schäfer (2017a): Can the Capital Markets Union Deliver? Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 86 (2), 89–98.  Google Scholar
  51. Kotz, H.-H., and D. Schäfer (2017b): EU Capital Markets Union: An Alluring Opportunity or a Blind Alley? The Macro-Perspective: CMU and Risk-Sharing. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 86 (1), 5–7.  Google Scholar
  52. Lisbon European Council (2000): Presidency Conclusions. 23 and 24 March 2000. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm  Google Scholar
  53. Michie, J. and C. Oughton (2013): Measuring Diversity in Financial Services Markets: A Diversity Index. SOAS. Discussion Paper No. 113. University of London, Centre for Financial and Management Studies.  Google Scholar
  54. Nogler, L., and U. Reifner (eds.) (2014): Life Time Contracts. Social Long-term Contracts in Labour, Tenancy and Consumer Credit Law. The Hague, Eleven International Publishing.  Google Scholar
  55. Pew Research Center (2014): Inequality Report. downloaded 8/1/2016 at: www.pewglobal.org/files/2014/10/Pew-Research-Center-Inequality-Report-FINAL-October-17-2014.pdf.  Google Scholar
  56. Prieg, L., and T. Greenham (2012): Stakeholder Banks - Benefits of banking diversity,nef (the new economics foundation). London. https://b.3cdn.net/nefoundation/e0b3bd-2b9423abfec8_pem6i6six.pdf  Google Scholar
  57. Reifner, U. (2018): Responsible Credit in European Law. The Italian Law Journal, 4 (2),421–448.  Google Scholar
  58. Ferri, G. (2017): The Evolution of Banking Regulation in the Post-Crisis Period: Cooperative and Savings Banks’ Perspective. In: E. Miklaszewska (ed.): Institutional Diversity in Banking. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 1–31.  Google Scholar
  59. Ferri, G., and P. Kalmi (2014): Only up: Regulatory burden and its effects on credit unions. Filene Research Institute report.  Google Scholar
  60. Ferri, G., P. Kalmi and E. Kerola (2014): Does bank ownership affect lending behavior? Evidence from the Euro area. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 194–209.  Google Scholar
  61. Ferri, G., and D. Neuberger (2014): The Banking Regulatory Bubble and How to Get out of It. Rivista di Politica Economica, Issue 2, 39–69.  Google Scholar
  62. Flögel, F., and S. Gärtner (2018): The Banking Systems of Germany, the UK and Spain from a Spatial Perspective: Lessons Learned and What Is to Be Done? IAT Discussion Paper 18/1A.  Google Scholar
  63. EU Parliament (2008): European Parliament resolution of 5 June 2008 on Competition:Sector inquiry on retail banking (2007/2201(INI)). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2008-0260+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN  Google Scholar
  64. EU Commission (2018): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament,the European Council, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth. Brussels, 8.3.2018, COM/2018/097 final.  Google Scholar
  65. EU Commission (2015): Building a Capital Markets Union. Green Paper.  Google Scholar
  66. EU Commission (2012): A Roadmap towards a Banking Union. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Brussels.  Google Scholar
  67. EU Commission (2007): Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon, 13 December 2007. Official Journal of the European Union, 2007/C 306/01.  Google Scholar
  68. EU Commission (2005b): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions—European values in the globalised world—Contribution of the Commission to the October Meeting of Heads of State and Government. Brussels, 3.11.2005, COM(2005) 525 final/2.  Google Scholar
  69. EU Commission (2005a): Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Common Actions for Growth and Employment: The Community Lisbon Programme. Brussels, 20.7.2005 COM(2005) 330 final.  Google Scholar
  70. ECB (2018): Banking Union. www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/about/bankingunion/html/index.en.html (retrieved 15.10.2019).  Google Scholar
  71. ECB (2017): Report on financial structures. October 2017. European Central Bank.  Google Scholar
  72. Conrad, A., A. Hoffmann and D. Neuberger (2018): Physische und digitale Erreichbarkeit von Finanzdienstleistungen der Sparkassen und Genossenschaftsbanken. Review of Regional Research, 38 (2), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-018-0121-7  Google Scholar
  73. Coccorese, P., and S. Shaffer (2018): Cooperative banks and local economic growth. CAMA Working Paper 11/2018. Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Australian National University.  Google Scholar
  74. Amable, B. (2003): The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  75. Amidžic, G., A. Massara and A. Mialou (2014): Assessing Countries’ Financial Inclusion Standing—A New Composite Index. IMF Working Papers 14/36. Washington, D. C., International Monetary Fund.  Google Scholar
  76. Ayadi, R., G. Ferri and V. Pesic (2018): Does Business Model Instability Imperil Banks’Soundness? Evidence from Europe. Bancaria, 7-8, 22–47.  Google Scholar
  77. Brunnermeier, M. K., L. Garicano, P. R. Lane, M. Pagano, R. Reis, T. Santos, D. Thesmar, S. Van Nieuwerburgh and D. Vayanos (2016): The sovereign-bank diabolic loop and ESBies. American Economic Review, 106 (5), 508–512.  Google Scholar
  78. BMZ/IFC/CGAP (2011): Advancing Responsible Finance for Greater Development Impact 2011. Consultation Draft. 27 January, German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), International Finance Corporation (IFC), Washington, D. C.  Google Scholar
  79. Bikker, J. A. and K. Haaf (2002): Measures of Competition and Concentration in the Banking Industry: A Review of the Literature. Economic & Financial Modelling, Summer 2002, Central Bank of the Netherlands.  Google Scholar
  80. Bharath, S. T., S. Dahiya, A. Saunders and A. Srinivasan (2011): Lending Relationships and Loan Contract Terms. The Review of Financial Studies, 24 (4), 1141–1203. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp064  Google Scholar
  81. Bartoli, F., G. Ferri, P. Murro and Z. Rotondi (2013): SME financing and the choice of lending technology in Italy: Complementarity or substitutability? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 5476–5485.  Google Scholar
  82. Ayadi, R., D. T. Llewellyn, R. H. Schmidt, E. Arbak, and W. P. De Groen (2010): Investigating Diversity in the Banking Sector in Europe. Key Developments, Performance and Role of Cooperative Banks. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Die globale Finanzkrise (GFC: 2008–2009) und die Euro-Staatsschuldenkrise (ESC: 2010–2012) scheinen ein Prozess der kreativen Zerstörung für die Europäische Union (EU) zu sein. Den enormen Schäden, die durch die GFC und ESC verursacht wurden, folgten in der Tat wichtige institutionelle Aufbauschritte wie die Bankenunion (BU) und die Kapitalmarktunion (CMU). Ihre schnelle Einführung deutet darauf hin, dass BU und CMU als Notfalllösungen zum Einsatz kamen. Im Nachhinein können wir sie nun neu bewerten. Wir gehen davon aus, dass zwei unbeabsichtigte Nebeneffekte eingetreten sind: 1) Die CMU hat das Gleichgewicht gegen das Bankwesen und zugunsten der Finanzmärkte verschoben; 2) die BU schwächt de facto die Bankenvielfalt. Selbst wenn es CMU und BU gelungen ist, die wirtschaftlichen Ziele der EU zu erreichen, beeinträchtigen ihre Nebenwirkungen die sozialen und kulturellen Ziele, die gleichermaßen in den EU-Verträgen verankert sind. Wir argumentieren, dass CMU und BU überarbeitet werden sollten, um den Schaden für soziale und kulturelle Ziele zu begrenzen, oder dass andere EU-Politiken entwickelt werden sollten, um das Gleichgewicht wiederherzustellen.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Giovanni Ferri and Doris Neuberger: How does banking diversity fit in the general vision inspiring the joint process of Banking Union and Capital Markets Union? 1
Summary 1
Zusammenfassung 1
1 Introduction 2
2 Economic, social and cultural objectives of the EU treaties 2
3 Objectives of CMU and BU and relationships with banking diversity 4
4 Contributions of banking diversity to the objectives of the EU treaties 6
5 Summary and conclusions 9
References 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.