Migrationsverwaltungsrecht zwischen Beschleunigung und Effizienz
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Migrationsverwaltungsrecht zwischen Beschleunigung und Effizienz
Die Verwaltung, Vol. 52 (2019), Iss. 3 : pp. 337–358
2 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
Nora Markard, Hamburg
Cited By
-
Law and Migration in a Changing World
Hyperactive and Incoherent Legislation and Policy: Germany’s Fragmented Migration Management Within the European Framework
Hruschka, Constantin
2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99508-3_8 [Citations: 0] -
Excluded by crisis management? Legislative hyperactivity in post‐2015 Germany
Hruschka, Constantin | Rohmann, TimInternational Migration, Vol. 61 (2023), Iss. 3 P.12
https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12926 [Citations: 6]
Abstract
Migration law between acceleration and efficiency Efficiency and speed of decision making have been a recurrent theme of German administrative law reform since the 1970 s. Although migration law has long been the subject of acceleration efforts, this occurred largely outside the general efficiency discourse. In an effort to connect these two strands, this article first retraces the trends that the administrative efficiency discourse has undergone since the 1970 s and points out how the sectors of law driving it – environmental law, emission control, and economic regulation – as well as an economic paradigm have promoted an truncated understanding of efficiency as mere acceleration. In a second step, it shows that while the devaluation of procedure in the interest of speed does align with a German focus on subsequent judicial review, it neither does justice to the relevance of the procedure to the realization of fundamental rights, not to its specific performances: the development of substantive requirements, transparency, participation, legitimacy. Asylum law in particular has experienced a surge of acceleration measures since 2015, pushed by the consulting firm McKinsey. But its existential relevance for protection seekers and the particular dependency of the right to asylum on the asylum procedure require an especially rigorous examination. An efficiency concept geared merely toward acceleration cannot do justice to these specific challenges, as the McKinsey measures have demonstrated; the burden has simply been shifted on the courts. In its last part, this article therefore proposes a qualitative efficiency concept that bears in mind the entirety of the functions of the administrative procedure, takes into account the different requirements of the procedure in different sectors of law, and does not lose sight of the reciprocity between administrative and judicial procedure. Meanwhile, pilot studies from the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Germany show that a qualitatively efficient asylum procedure is not necessarily a slower or more costly procedure.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Nora Markard: Migrationsverwaltungsrecht zwischen Beschleunigung und Effizienz | 337 | ||
I. Effizienz im Verwaltungsrecht | 338 | ||
1. Der Effizienzbegriff | 338 | ||
2. Konjunkturen der Effizienzdebatte im Verwaltungsrecht | 339 | ||
II. Grenzen der Effizienz im Verwaltungsverfahren | 342 | ||
1. Grundrechtssicherung durch Verfahren und effektiver Rechtsschutz | 343 | ||
2. Vernachlässigter Eigenwert des Verfahrens? | 344 | ||
3. Ein verkürzter Effizienzbegriff | 345 | ||
III. Effizienz im Migrationsverwaltungsrecht | 345 | ||
1. Besonderheiten des Migrationsverwaltungsrechts | 337 | ||
2. Legislative Initiativen zur Beschleunigung | 337 | ||
3. Unternehmensberatung im BAMF | 337 | ||
4. Effizienzverluste durch Beschleunigung? | 337 | ||
IV. Ein differenzierter Effizienzbegriff | 337 | ||
1. Gesamtheit der Funktionen des Verwaltungsverfahrens | 337 | ||
2. Aufgabenabhängigkeit des Verwaltungsverfahrens | 337 | ||
3. Verhältnis zwischen Verfahren und Prozess | 337 | ||
V. Perspektiven | 337 | ||
Abstract: Migration law between acceleration and efficiency | 338 |