Corporate Governance in Familienunternehmen
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Corporate Governance in Familienunternehmen
ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 56 (2008), Iss. 1-2 : pp. 18–35
9 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
1Sabine B. Klein, Chair of Strategy and Family Business, European Business School, Rheingaupalais, D-65301 Wiesbaden, Deutschland.
- Sabine B. Klein ist akademische Direktorin des European Family Business Center, Professorin mit Schwerpunkt Familienunternehmen und Head of Department Strategie, Organisation und Führung an der European Business School, Oestrich-Winkel, Deutschland.
- Search in Google Scholar
Cited By
-
Governance-Mechanismen in Familienunternehmen: Inhibitoren oder Katalysatoren für die Internationalisierung des Unternehmens
Pukall, Thilo | Calabrò, Andrea | Huse, MortenZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 61 (2013), Iss. 4 P.243
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.4.243 [Citations: 0] -
Familienklima und Konflikte in Familienunternehmen: Eine empirische Analyse ihrer Erfolgswirkungen
Nosé, Lavinia | Korunka, Christian | Frank, Hermann | Suchy, DanielaZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 61 (2013), Iss. 1–2 P.55
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.55 [Citations: 1] -
Understanding Family Businesses
Transferring Strategy Research to the Family Firm Context: A Fit Perspective on Performance in Family Firms
Lindow, Corinna M.
2012
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0911-3_13 [Citations: 3] -
Management von Familienunternehmen
Familieninstrumente
Felden, Birgit | Hack, Andreas2014
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-4159-6_10 [Citations: 0] -
Informationsasymmetrien zwischen Übergeber und Nachfolger – Herausforderungen und Lösungsmöglichkeiten am Beispiel des Management Buy Ins in Familienunternehmen
Halter, Frank | Dehlen, Tobias | Sieger, Philipp | Wolter, Hans-JürgenZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 61 (2013), Iss. 1–2 P.35
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.35 [Citations: 7] -
A Review of Theory in Family Business Research: The Implications for Corporate Governance
Siebels, Jan‐Folke | zu Knyphausen‐Aufseß, DodoInternational Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 14 (2012), Iss. 3 P.280
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00317.x [Citations: 175] -
Die Organisation des Controllings in österreichischen und bayerischen Familienunternehmen
Hiebl, Martin | Feldbauer-Durstmüller, Birgit | Duller, ChristineZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 61 (2013), Iss. 1–2 P.83
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.83 [Citations: 19] -
Management von Familienunternehmen
Instrumente der Family Business Governance
Felden, Birgit | Hack, Andreas | Hoon, Christina2019
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24058-5_12 [Citations: 0] -
Aktuelle Trends und Entwicklungen im Controlling in und für KMU: Eine Einführung der Gastherausgeber
Feldbauer-Durstmüller, Birgit | Hiebl, Martin R. W.ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 63 (2015), Iss. 3–4 P.193
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.63.3-4.193 [Citations: 5]
Abstract
This article focuses on different concepts in corporate governance and how they can support the theoretical development for non-family businesses. The discussion is based on three approaches: 1. Corporate governance as a systems framework that is internationally comparable, 2. Corporate governance as an organizational constellation and its influence on company performance and 3. Corporate governance as structures and processes in the organization.
The first key point is that family businesses are a very heterogeneous group. Therefore, to have a highly efficient leading and monitoring structure, every company has to be analysed individually. Based on the description of Lane et al.'s corporate governance model, Klein extends this framework by focusing on different market capabilities and cultural influences on the family business. Since every business is uniquely influenced by its national environment, relating family business research in one cultural setting to that of another will be problematic.
A second point refers to evidence showing that independent boards are less established in family businesses than in non-family businesses. Therefore, it is assumed that the performance of family businesses and non-family businesses differs. To describe the members involved, the model of man in both agency and stewardship theory is discussed. It is shown how both theories complement rather than contradict each other.
The third point discusses the existence, tasks and compensation of the board of directors in family businesses compared to non-family businesses. Informal and formal monitoring in terms of family governance is considered and mentioned as a main aspect where family and non-family business differ.