Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Hechenberger, G. Einseitig alternativ? Zur Frage des Alternativen im Geld- und Finanzsystem. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 85(2), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.85.2.35
Hechenberger, Georg "Einseitig alternativ? Zur Frage des Alternativen im Geld- und Finanzsystem" Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 85.2, 2016, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.85.2.35
Hechenberger, Georg (2016): Einseitig alternativ? Zur Frage des Alternativen im Geld- und Finanzsystem, in: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 85, iss. 2, 35-48, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.85.2.35

Format

Einseitig alternativ? Zur Frage des Alternativen im Geld- und Finanzsystem

Hechenberger, Georg

Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 85 (2016), Iss. 2 : pp. 35–48

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Georg Hechenberger, LFU Innsbruck, Institut für Soziologie

Cited By

  1. Teilen, tauschen, leihen – Auswirkungen auf Arbeitsmarkt, Umwelt, Soziales

    Hagen,, Kornelia

    Rückert-John, Jana

    Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 85 (2016), Iss. 3 P.5

    https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.85.3.5 [Citations: 3]

Abstract

The paper shows that models of consumption and business can hardly be considered alternative as long as they are carried out over the established money and finance system. Cause this system stands– already in the basic dimensions of space and time–for the big and the fast and as such for the opposite of what is defined as alternative on a most general basis. Doing so, first of all a process of money decoupling and abstracting is retraced. Money-qualities resulting from this process are subsequently described regarding their time-space-effects. Following that it"s explained why the same structures are responsible for a harder implementation of alternative models. In any case what finally remains is a recommendation for more qualified and critical financial education.