Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Andersson, R. Neighbourhood Effects and the Welfare State. Towards a European Research Agenda?. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 128(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.128.1.49
Andersson, Roger "Neighbourhood Effects and the Welfare State. Towards a European Research Agenda?" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 128.1, 2008, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.128.1.49
Andersson, Roger (2008): Neighbourhood Effects and the Welfare State. Towards a European Research Agenda?, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 128, iss. 1, 49-63, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.128.1.49

Format

Neighbourhood Effects and the Welfare State. Towards a European Research Agenda?

Andersson, Roger

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 128 (2008), Iss. 1 : pp. 49–63

7 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Roger Andersson, Uppsala University, Institute for Housing & Urban Research, Sweden.

Cited By

  1. Counteracting Segregation: Swedish Policies and Experiences

    Andersson, Roger | Bråmå, Åsa | Holmqvist, Emma

    Housing Studies, Vol. 25 (2010), Iss. 2 P.237

    https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030903561859 [Citations: 96]
  2. Reproducing and reshaping ethnic residential segregation in stockholm: the role of selective migration moves

    Andersson, Roger

    Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, Vol. 95 (2013), Iss. 2 P.163

    https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12015 [Citations: 40]
  3. Rethinking the Long-Term Consequences of Growing Up in a Disadvantaged Neighbourhood: Lessons from Sweden

    Brännström, Lars | Rojas, Yerko

    Housing Studies, Vol. 27 (2012), Iss. 6 P.729

    https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.714460 [Citations: 13]
  4. What scale matters? exploring the relationships between individuals' social position, neighbourhood context and the scale of neighbourhood

    Andersson, Roger | Musterd, Sako

    Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, Vol. 92 (2010), Iss. 1 P.23

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00331.x [Citations: 50]
  5. Neighbourhood effects on young people's future living conditions: Longitudinal findings from Sweden

    Brännström, Lars

    International Journal of Social Welfare, Vol. 21 (2012), Iss. 4 P.325

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00842.x [Citations: 9]
  6. Multi-agent simulator for urban segregation (MASUS): A tool to explore alternatives for promoting inclusive cities

    Feitosa, Flávia F. | Le, Quang Bao | Vlek, Paul L.G.

    Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 35 (2011), Iss. 2 P.104

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.06.001 [Citations: 43]
  7. The Impact of Residential Mobility on Measurements of Neighbourhood Effects

    Hedman, Lina

    Housing Studies, Vol. 26 (2011), Iss. 04 P.501

    https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2011.559753 [Citations: 39]

Abstract

This paper raises four broad questions related to the neighbourhood effect issue.

(1) Is there really a strong relation between housing mix and social mix? (2) How does the social composition of neighbourhoods affect residents' social interaction and behaviour? (3) Are social opportunities of individual residents related to their neighbourhood context? (4) If there is such a relation, to what extent is this produced through local social interaction?

While the answer to the first question is often taken for granted, not only by planners but also by urban research, the following three have been much discussed over the last decade on both sides of the Atlantic. Most researchers hypothesise that neighbourhood effects would be less pronounced in countries like Sweden, where planning practices, social class differences, segregation patterns, and welfare state regulations substantially differ from those found in the U.S. However, recent empirical studies – based on large longitudinal datasets – confirm the existence of neighbourhood effects also in Sweden. Future European research should not only further explore the above four questions but needs also to systematically engage with issues concerning how neighbourhoods should be defined (scale issues), the importance of time of residency in particular neighbourhoods, and how mix should be operationalised (class, ethnicity etc).