Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Burgstaller, J. Banks in Disadvantaged Areas. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 45(1), 51-78. https://doi.org/10.3790/kuk.45.1.51
Burgstaller, Johann "Banks in Disadvantaged Areas" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 45.1, 2012, 51-78. https://doi.org/10.3790/kuk.45.1.51
Burgstaller, Johann (2012): Banks in Disadvantaged Areas, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 45, iss. 1, 51-78, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/kuk.45.1.51

Format

Banks in Disadvantaged Areas

Burgstaller, Johann

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 45 (2012), Iss. 1 : pp. 51–78

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Dr. Johann Burgstaller, University of Linz, Finance Department, Freistädterstraße 315, A–4040 Linz/Austria

Cited By

  1. Call for a Spatial Classification of Banking Systems through the Lens of SME Finance -- Decentralized versus Centralized Banking in Germany as an Example

    GGrtner, Stefan

    Fllgel, Franz

    (2014)

    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2446822 [Citations: 12]

Abstract

Banks in Disadvantaged Areas

Based on the presumption that the empirical banking literature devotes too little attention to institutions with special features, this paper examines banks that are affected by low regional development. Data on the full population of Austrian banks is applied to identify such banks and to study their particular characteristics. It turns out that banks operating in disadvantaged areas differ from their counterparts with respect to individual as well as market–related attributes. Additionally, several effects commonly estimated in empirical banking models prove to be sensitive to the exclusion of these institutions from the estimation sample. These comprise the effect of bank size on the net interest margin, the heterogeneity of loan supply reactions to monetary policy signals which are related to the banks' liquidity position, and the influence of local concentration on competitive behavior. Our findings confirm that key empirical results may be driven by certain groups of banks with special features. Thus, support is provided for the necessity of a more critical view of empirical outcomes for „the average bank", both from national samples and cross–country studies. (JEL G21, L11, R32)