Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Stagl, S. Valuation for Sustainable Development – The Role of Multicriteria Evaluation. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 73(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.73.1.53
Stagl, Sigrid "Valuation for Sustainable Development – The Role of Multicriteria Evaluation" Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 73.1, , 53-62. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.73.1.53
Stagl, Sigrid: Valuation for Sustainable Development – The Role of Multicriteria Evaluation, in: Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 73, iss. 1, 53-62, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.73.1.53

Format

Valuation for Sustainable Development – The Role of Multicriteria Evaluation

Stagl, Sigrid

Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 73 (2004), Iss. 1 : pp. 53–62

13 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

1School of the Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, Großbritannien.

Cited By

  1. Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values

    Irvine, Katherine N. | O’Brien, Liz | Ravenscroft, Neil | Cooper, Nigel | Everard, Mark | Fazey, Ioan | Reed, Mark S. | Kenter, Jasper O.

    Ecosystem Services, Vol. 21 (2016), Iss. P.184

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.07.001 [Citations: 108]
  2. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017

    Deliberative Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation (DSM-CE): Forming Shared Cultural Values

    Cerreta, Maria | Panaro, Simona

    2017

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62398-6_53 [Citations: 7]
  3. Resource-directed spatial planning of agritourism with GIS

    van der Merwe, J.H. | Ferreira, S.L.A. | van Niekerk, A.

    South African Geographical Journal, Vol. 95 (2013), Iss. 1 P.16

    https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2013.805080 [Citations: 17]
  4. Zukunftstechnologien und Kompetenzbedarfe

    Voraussetzungen der erfolgreichen Implementierung von Kompetenzmanagement in KMU

    Sprafke, Nicole | Hohagen, Saskia | Erlinghagen, Mara | Nolte, Alexander | Wenig, Philipp | Zechmann, Andreas | Wilkens, Uta | Minssen, Heiner | Herrmann, Thomas Andreas

    2019

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54952-0_5 [Citations: 2]
  5. A Framework of Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of Freshwater Systems

    Ioris, Antonio A. R. | Hunter, Colin | Walker, Susan

    Physical Geography, Vol. 27 (2006), Iss. 5 P.396

    https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3646.27.5.396 [Citations: 6]
  6. Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete

    Tsoutsos, Theocharis | Drandaki, Maria | Frantzeskaki, Niki | Iosifidis, Eleftherios | Kiosses, Ioannis

    Energy Policy, Vol. 37 (2009), Iss. 5 P.1587

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.011 [Citations: 268]
  7. Forming shared values in conservation management: An interpretive-deliberative-democratic approach to including community voices

    Ranger, S. | Kenter, J.O. | Bryce, R. | Cumming, G. | Dapling, T. | Lawes, E. | Richardson, P.B.

    Ecosystem Services, Vol. 21 (2016), Iss. P.344

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.016 [Citations: 70]
  8. The development and application of water management sustainability indicators in Brazil and Scotland

    Ioris, Antonio A.R. | Hunter, Colin | Walker, Susan

    Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 88 (2008), Iss. 4 P.1190

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.007 [Citations: 50]
  9. Deliberative valuation without prices: A multiattribute prioritization for watershed ecosystem management

    Randhir, Timothy | Shriver, Deborah M.

    Ecological Economics, Vol. 68 (2009), Iss. 12 P.3042

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.008 [Citations: 19]
  10. An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties

    Autran Monteiro Gomes, Luiz Flávio | Duncan Rangel, Luı´s Alberto

    European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 193 (2009), Iss. 1 P.204

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.10.046 [Citations: 279]
  11. Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment and valuation: Mixed methods or mixed messages?

    Hattam, Caroline | Böhnke-Henrichs, Anne | Börger, Tobias | Burdon, Daryl | Hadjimichael, Maria | Delaney, Alyne | Atkins, Jonathan P. | Garrard, Samantha | Austen, Melanie C.

    Ecological Economics, Vol. 120 (2015), Iss. P.126

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.011 [Citations: 52]
  12. What are shared and social values of ecosystems?

    Kenter, Jasper O. | O'Brien, Liz | Hockley, Neal | Ravenscroft, Neil | Fazey, Ioan | Irvine, Katherine N. | Reed, Mark S. | Christie, Michael | Brady, Emily | Bryce, Rosalind | Church, Andrew | Cooper, Nigel | Davies, Althea | Evely, Anna | Everard, Mark | Fish, Robert | Fisher, Janet A. | Jobstvogt, Niels | Molloy, Claire | Orchard-Webb, Johanne | Ranger, Susan | Ryan, Mandy | Watson, Verity | Williams, Susan

    Ecological Economics, Vol. 111 (2015), Iss. P.86

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.01.006 [Citations: 341]
  13. The valuation of sustainable freehold property: a CRE perspective

    Mansfield, John R.

    Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 11 (2009), Iss. 2 P.91

    https://doi.org/10.1108/14630010910963133 [Citations: 10]

Abstract

Multicriteria methods were found to be useful tools to support decision-making about complex situations – such as those concerned with sustainable development issues – and to deal with conflicts in a structured and transparent way. Increasingly multicriteria evaluation (MCE) is also seen as a constructive response to the critique of cost-benefit analysis. MCE enables decision-makers to take multiple dimensions of impacts of the considered projects into account without the need for full monetarisation. A great number of multicriteria algorithms are now available. The algorithms differ in fundamental ways. Besides the algorithms also the implementation of the valuation technique is important for the outcome. In order to address issues like uncertainty, multiple legitimate perspectives and the need for learning during the decision process, ecological economists apply MCE mostly by combining the analytical tool with participatory techniques.

Zusammenfassung

Multikriterienmethoden erweisen sich als nützlich, um die Entscheidungsfindung in komplexen Situationen – wie solche eine nachhaltige Entwicklung betreffend – zu unterstützen und um mit Konflikten in einer strukturierten und transparenten Art umzugehen. Zunehmend wird multikriterielle Bewertung auch als konstruktive Antwort auf die Kritik der Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse gesehen. Die multikriterielle Bewertung ermöglicht es EntscheidungsträgerInnen, die verschiedenen Dimensionen der Auswirkungen der zur Auswahl stehenden Projekte zu berücksichtigen, ohne diese gänzlich monetarisieren zu müssen. Eine Vielzahl von grundlegend verschiedenen mathematischen Algorithmen für die multikriterielle Bewertung steht zur Verfügung. Außer dem Algorithmus beeinflusst auch die Implementierung der Bewertungsmethode das Ergebnis. Um Probleme wie Unsicherheit, unterschiedliche legitime Problemsichtweisen und die Notwendigkeit von Lernen während des Entscheidungsprozesses zu adressieren, setzen ökologische ÖkonomInnen multikriterielle Bewertung vor allem in Kombination mit partizipativen Methoden ein.