Menu Expand

Familienklima und Konflikte in Familienunternehmen: Eine empirische Analyse ihrer Erfolgswirkungen

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship
  4. Vol. 61, Issue 1–2
  5. pp. 55–81

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Nosé, L., Korunka, C., Frank, H., Suchy, D. Familienklima und Konflikte in Familienunternehmen: Eine empirische Analyse ihrer Erfolgswirkungen. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 61(1–2), 55-81. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.55
Nosé, Lavinia; Korunka, Christian; Frank, Hermann and Suchy, Daniela "Familienklima und Konflikte in Familienunternehmen: Eine empirische Analyse ihrer Erfolgswirkungen" ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 61.1–2, 2013, 55-81. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.55
Nosé, Lavinia/Korunka, Christian/Frank, Hermann/Suchy, Daniela (2013): Familienklima und Konflikte in Familienunternehmen: Eine empirische Analyse ihrer Erfolgswirkungen, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, vol. 61, iss. 1–2, 55-81, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.55
Format
Download

Familienklima und Konflikte in Familienunternehmen: Eine empirische Analyse ihrer Erfolgswirkungen

Nosé, Lavinia | Korunka, Christian | Frank, Hermann | Suchy, Daniela

ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 61 (2013), Iss. 1–2 : pp. 55–81

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.55
Language
German
Pages
27

Pricing

Individual
€ 26.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Mag. Lavinia Nosé, Universität Wien, Fakultät für Psychologie, Institut für Angewandte Psychologie: Arbeit, Bildung, Wirtschaft, Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Wien, Österreich.

Prof. Dr. Christian Korunka, Universität Wien, Fakultät für Psychologie, Institut für Angewandte Psychologie: Arbeit, Bildung, Wirtschaft, Universitätsstraße 7, A-1010 Wien, Österreich.

Prof. Dr. Hermann Frank, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Forschungsinstitut für Familienunternehmen, Augasse 2–6, A-1090 Wien, Österreich.

Daniela Suchy, M.A., Universität Wien, Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften, Institut für Soziologie, Rooseveltplatz 2, A-1090 Wien, Österreich.

Cited By

  1. Family businesses and non-family equity: literature review and avenues for future research

    Thiele, Felix K.

    Management Review Quarterly, Vol. 67 (2017), Iss. 1 P.31

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0123-5 [Citations: 13]

References

  1. Amason, A. C. und Sapienza, H. J. (1997): The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict, in: Journal of Management, 23 (4), 495–516.  Google Scholar
  2. Amason, A. C. und Schweiger, D. M. (1994): Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance, in: International Journal of Conflict Management, 5 (3), 239–253.  Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, S. A. (1986): Cohesion, adaptability, and communication: A test of an Olson circumplex model, in: Family Relations, 35 (2), 289–293.  Google Scholar
  4. Astrachan, J. H., Klein, S. B. und Smyrnios, K. X. (2002): The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem, in: Family Business Review, 15 (1), 45–58.  Google Scholar
  5. Astrachan, J. H. und McMillan, K. S. (2003): Confllict and communication in the family business, Marietta: Family Enterprise Publishers.  Google Scholar
  6. Becker, T. E. und Vance, R. J. (1993): Construct validity of three types of organizational citizenship behavior: An illustration of the direct product model with refinements, in: Journal of Management, 19 (3), 663–682.  Google Scholar
  7. Björnberg, A. und Nicholson, N. (2007): The family climate scales: Development of a new measure for use in family business research, in: Family Business Review, 20 (3), 229–246.  Google Scholar
  8. Boulding, K. E. (1963): Conflict and defense: A general theory, 1. Aufl., New York: Harper & Row.  Google Scholar
  9. Buzzell, R. D. und Gale, B. T. (1989): Das PIMS-Programm – Strategien und Unternehmenserfolg, Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.  Google Scholar
  10. Casper, V. (2004): Sense of coherence – Die Kraft der Gruppe, 1. Aufl., Münster: LIT.  Google Scholar
  11. Chandler, G. N. und Hanks, S.H. (1993): Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (5), 391–408.  Google Scholar
  12. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H. und Sharma, P. (2005): Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (5), 555–575.  Google Scholar
  13. Colli, A. (2011): Contextualizing performances of family firms: The perspective of business history, in: Family Business Review, im Druck.  Google Scholar
  14. Cooper, A. C. und Artz, K. W. (1995): Determinants of satisfaction for enterpreneurs, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 10 (6), 439–457.  Google Scholar
  15. Cosier, R. A. und Rose, G. L. (1977): Cognitive conflict and goal conflict effects on task performance, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 19 (2), 378–391.  Google Scholar
  16. Danes, S.M., Fitzgerald, N. und Doll, K. C. (2000a): Financial and relationship predictors of family business goal achievement, in: Financial Counseling and Planning, 11 (2), 43–53.  Google Scholar
  17. Danes, S.M., Leichentritt, R. D., Metz, M. E. und Huddleston-Casas, C. (2000b): Effects of conflict styles and conflict severity on quality of life of men and women in family businesses, in: Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 21 (3), 259–286.  Google Scholar
  18. Danes, S. M. und Olson, P. D. (2003): Women’s role involvement in family businesses, business tensions, and business success, in: Family Business Review, 16 (1), 53–68.  Google Scholar
  19. Danes, S.M., Zuiker, V. S., Kean, R. und Arbuthnot, J. (1999): Predictors of family business tensions and goal achievement, in: Family Business Review, 12 (3), 241–252.  Google Scholar
  20. Davis, P. S. und Harveston, P. D. (2001): The phenomenon of substantive conflict in the family firm: A cross-generational study, in: Journal of Small Business Management, 39 (1), 14–30.  Google Scholar
  21. De Dreu, C. K. W. und Van De Vliert, E. (1997): Using conflict in organizations, 1. Aufl., London: Sage Publications.  Google Scholar
  22. De Dreu, C. K. W. und Weingart, L. R. (2003): Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4), 741–749.  Google Scholar
  23. Debicki, B. J., Matherne III, C. F., Kellermanns, F. W. und Chrisman, J. J. (2009): Family business research in the new millennium. An overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why, in: Family Business Review, 22 (2), 151–166.  Google Scholar
  24. DeChurch, L. A. und Marks, M. A. (2001): Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: The role of conflict management, in: The International Journal of Conflict Management, 12 (1), 4–22.  Google Scholar
  25. Deutsch, M. und Kotik, P. (1978): Altruism and Bargaining, in: Saumermann, H. (Hrsg.): Bargaining Behavior, Tübingen: Mohr, 20–40.  Google Scholar
  26. Diamantopoulos, A. und Winklhofer, H. M. (2001): Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2), 269–277.  Google Scholar
  27. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. und Griffin, S. (1985): The satisfaction with life scale, in: Journal of Personality Assessment, 49 (1), 71–75.  Google Scholar
  28. Eddleston, K. A. und Kellermanns, F. W. (2007): Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (4), 545–565.  Google Scholar
  29. Ensley, M. D. und Pearce, C. L. (2001): Shared cognition in top management teams: Implications for new venture performance, in: Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22 (2), 145–160.  Google Scholar
  30. Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W. und Amason, A. C. (2002): Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict and new venture performance, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (4), 365–386.  Google Scholar
  31. Frank, H., Keßler, A., Nosé, L. und Suchy, D. (2011): Conflicts in family firms: State of the art and perspectives for future research, in: Journal of Family Business Management, 1 (2), 130–153.  Google Scholar
  32. Guerra, J. M., Martinez, I., Munduate, L. und Medina, F. J. (2005): A congingency perspective on the study of the consequences of conflict types: The role of organizational culture, in: European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14 (2), 157–176.  Google Scholar
  33. Harman, H. H. (1976): Modern factor analysis, 3. Aufl., Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  34. Humphrey, L. L. und Stern, S. (1988): Object relations and the family system in bulimia: A theoretical integration, in: Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14 (4), 337–350.  Google Scholar
  35. Jehn, K. A. (1994): Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict, in: Journal of Conflict Management, 5 (3), 223–238.  Google Scholar
  36. Jehn, K. A. (1995): A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (2), 256–282.  Google Scholar
  37. Jehn, K. A. (1997): A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 42 (3), 530–557.  Google Scholar
  38. Jehn, K. A. und Bendersky, C. (2003): Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship, in: Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–241.  Google Scholar
  39. Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S. und Szulanski, G. (2008): The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes, in: Group Decision Negotiation, 17 (6), 465–495.  Google Scholar
  40. Jehn, K. A. und Mannix, E. A. (2001): The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance, in: The Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2), 238–251.  Google Scholar
  41. Kavanagh, D. J., O’Halloran, P., Manicavasagar, V., Clark, D., Piatkowska, O. und Tennant, C. (1997): The family attitude scale: reliability and validity of a new scale for measuring the emotional climate of families, in: Psychiatry Research, 70 (3), 185–195.  Google Scholar
  42. Kellermanns, F. W. und Eddleston, K. A. (2004): Feuding families: When conflict does a family firm good, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28 (3), 209–228.  Google Scholar
  43. Kellermanns, F. W. und Eddleston, K. A. (2006): Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (6), 809–830.  Google Scholar
  44. Kellermanns, F. W. und Eddleston, K. A. (2007): A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm performance, in: Journal of Business Research, 60 (10), 1048–1057.  Google Scholar
  45. Klein, S. B. (2008): Corporate Governance in Familienunternehmen, in: Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 56 (1– 2), 18–35.  Google Scholar
  46. Kossek, E. E., Colquitt, J. A. und Noe, R. A. (2001): Caregiving decisions, wellbeing, and performance: The effects of place and provider as a function of dependent type and work-family climates, in: Academy of Management Journal, 44 (1), 29–44.  Google Scholar
  47. Laliberté, M., Boland, F. J. und Leichner, P. (1999): Family Climates: Family factors specific to disturbed eating and bulimia nervosa, in: Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55 (9), 1021–1040.  Google Scholar
  48. Levinson, H. (1971): Conflicts that plague family businesses, in: Harvard Business Review, 49 (1), 90–98.  Google Scholar
  49. Nicolai, A. und Kieser, A. (2002): Trotz eklatanter Erfolglosigkeit: Die Erfoglsfaktorenforschung weiter auf Erfolgskurs, in: Die Betriebswirtschaft, 62 (6), 579–596.  Google Scholar
  50. Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H. und Russell, C. S. (1979): Circumplex model of marital and family systems: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications, in: Family Process, 18 (1), 3–28.  Google Scholar
  51. Peters, T. J. und Waterman jun., R. H. (1991): Auf der Suche nach Spitzenleistungen: Was man von den bestgeführten US-Unternehmen lernen kann, 14. Auflage, Landsberg/Lech: Verlag Moderne Industrie.  Google Scholar
  52. Pieper, T. M. (2007): Mechanisms to assure long-term family business survival, 5, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.  Google Scholar
  53. Pieper, T. M. (2010): Non solus: Toward a psychology of family business, in: Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1 (1), 26–39.  Google Scholar
  54. Pinkley, R. L. (1990): Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (2), 117–126.  Google Scholar
  55. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. und Podsakoff, N. P. (2003): Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.  Google Scholar
  56. Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R. und Camerer, C. (1998): Not so different after all: A cross discipline view of trust, in: Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), 393–404.  Google Scholar
  57. Rüsen, T. A. (2009): Krisen und Krisenmanagement in Familienunternehmen, Wiesbaden: Gabler Fachverlage GmbH.  Google Scholar
  58. Schlippe, A. von, Buberti, C., Groth, T. und Plate, M. (2009): Die zehn Wittener Thesen, in: Familienunternehmen, W. I. f. (Hrsg.): Familienunternehmen, Lohmar – Köln: Josef EUL Verlag, 1–24.  Google Scholar
  59. Schlippe, A. von und Kellermanns, F. W. (2008): Emotionale Konflikte in Familienunternehmen, in: Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 56 (1 / 2), 40–58.  Google Scholar
  60. Simons, T. L. und Peterson, R. S. (2000): Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 85 (1), 102–111.  Google Scholar
  61. Sorenson, R. L. (1999): Conflict management strategies used by successful family businesses, in: Family Business Review, 12 (4), 325–339.  Google Scholar
  62. Steier, L. (2001): Family firms, plural forms of governance and the evolving role of trust, in: Family Business Review, 14 (4), 353–367.  Google Scholar
  63. Stewart, C. C. und Danes, S. M. (2001): Inclusion and control in resort family businesses: A developmental approach to conflict, in: Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22 (3), 293–320.  Google Scholar
  64. van der Merwe, S.P. und Ellis, S. M. (2007): An exploratory study of some of the determinants of harmonious family relationships in small and medium-sized family businesses, in: Management Dynamics, 16 (4), 24–35.  Google Scholar
  65. Zellweger, T. M. und Nason, R. S. (2008): A stakeholder perspective on family firm performance, in: Family Business Review, 21 (3), 203–216.  Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to empirically investigate the effect of relationship conflict on subjective and objective business outcomes and the moderating effect of family climate on the conflict–business outcome relationship. Using a nationally representative sample of 392 Austrian family businesses, the results demonstrated the negative effects of relationship conflict on firm satisfaction and firm performance. Family climate has a significant direct effect on firm satisfaction and moderates the relation of conflict with both business outcomes. Thus, a positive family climate can decrease the negative effects of relationship conflict on family businesses and must be promoted.

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.