„Ich müsste mich mit Triepel auseinandersetzen.“
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
„Ich müsste mich mit Triepel auseinandersetzen.“
Heinrich Triepel, Carl Schmitt und Die Hegemonie
Der Staat, Vol. 59 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 29–47
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
Prof. Dr. Reinhard Mehring, Rheinallee 122, 40545 Düsseldorf
Abstract
"Ich müsste mich mit Triepel auseinandersetzen." Heinrich Triepel, Carl Schmitt and The Hegemony
The article discusses general and political differences between Heinrich Triepel (1869-1946) and Carl Schmitt (1888-1985), on the basis of their rather marginal academic contacts prior to 1933, Triepel's late work Die Hegemonie (The Hegemony), published in 1938, Schmitt's detailed review thereof, as well as Triepel's last posthumously published work Vom Stil des Rechts (On the Style of the Law), that distanced itself in neo-humanistic fashion from National Socialism. Triepel was a Wilhelminian Bismarck admirer and monarchist by heart. Where Triepel wanted "Hegemonie" (hegemony) and strictly distinguished it from imperial and dictatorial "rule" (Herrschaft), Schmitt, in the transition to his "Großraumlehre" (Greater Area Policy), insisted on National Socialist "Führung" (leadership). Schmitt's matter-of-fact and respectful positioning towards Triepel highlights the conflict of methods and directions as a "political generational conflict" (Möllers).
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| „Ich müsste mich mit Triepel auseinandersetzen.” | 29 | ||
| Heinrich Triepel, Carl Schmitt und Die Hegemonie | 29 | ||
| I. Blütenlese einiger Erwähnungen | 30 | ||
| II. Triepels Präferenz für „Hegemonie” | 33 | ||
| III. Schmitts Triepel-Besprechung | 29 | ||
| IV. „Abscheu” vor dem Nationalsozialismus: Triepels Letztwerk Vom Stil des Rechts | 29 | ||
| V. Zur normativen Methode und Aktualität der Hegemonie | 29 |