Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Knies, G., Burgess, S., Propper, C. Keeping up with the Schmidt's – An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 128(1), 75-108. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.128.1.75
Knies, Gundi; Burgess, Simon and Propper, Carol "Keeping up with the Schmidt's – An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 128.1, 2008, 75-108. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.128.1.75
Knies, Gundi/Burgess, Simon/Propper, Carol (2008): Keeping up with the Schmidt's – An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 128, iss. 1, 75-108, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.128.1.75

Format

Keeping up with the Schmidt's – An Empirical Test of Relative Deprivation Theory in the Neighbourhood Context

Knies, Gundi | Burgess, Simon | Propper, Carol

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 128 (2008), Iss. 1 : pp. 75–108

14 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Gundi Knies, Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.

Simon Burgess, Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.

Carol Propper, Centre for Market and Public Organisation, University of Bristol, UK.

Cited By

  1. Political Trust Influences the Relationship Between Income and Life Satisfaction in Europe: Differential Associations With Trust at National, Community, and Individual Level

    Clench-Aas, Jocelyne | Holte, Arne

    Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 9 (2021), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.629118 [Citations: 8]
  2. The residential context as source of deprivation: Impacts on the local political culture. Evidence from the East German state Thuringia

    Salomo, Katja

    Political Geography, Vol. 69 (2019), Iss. P.103

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.07.001 [Citations: 16]
  3. Life Satisfaction and Economic Position Relative to Neighbors: Perceptions Versus Reality

    Bhuiyan, Muhammad Faress

    Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 19 (2018), Iss. 7 P.1935

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9904-8 [Citations: 5]
  4. Exploring the impact of urban neighbourhood environment on satisfaction with life in public housing in Nigeria

    Ibem, Eziyi O | Opoko, Akunnaya P | Aduwo, Egidario B

    URBAN DESIGN International, Vol. 21 (2016), Iss. 4 P.317

    https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2016.13 [Citations: 1]
  5. Neighbourhood deprivation, life satisfaction and earnings: Comparative analyses of neighbourhood effects at bespoke scales

    Knies, Gundi | Melo, Patricia C | Zhang, Min

    Urban Studies, Vol. 58 (2021), Iss. 13 P.2640

    https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020956930 [Citations: 15]
  6. Faster, higher, stronger… and happier? Relative achievement and marginal rank effects

    Dolan, Paul | Foy, Chloe | Kavetsos, Georgios | Kudrna, Laura

    Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, Vol. 95 (2021), Iss. P.101761

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101761 [Citations: 0]
  7. Neighbors' Income, Public Goods, and Well‐Being

    Brodeur, Abel | Flèche, Sarah

    Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 65 (2019), Iss. 2 P.217

    https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12367 [Citations: 22]
  8. Block, neighbourhood or district? the importance of geographical scale for area effects on educational attainment

    Brattbakk, Ingar

    Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, Vol. 96 (2014), Iss. 2 P.109

    https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12040 [Citations: 12]
  9. Wealth and Subjective Well-Being in Germany

    Jantsch, Antje | Le Blanc, Julia | Schmidt, Tobias

    SSRN Electronic Journal , Vol. (2022), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4094558 [Citations: 2]
  10. Trust Buffers Against Reduced Life Satisfaction When Faced With Financial Crisis

    Clench-Aas, Jocelyne | Bergande, Ingrid | Nes, Ragnhild Bang | Holte, Arne

    Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12 (2021), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.632585 [Citations: 0]
  11. Effects of Income and Material Deprivation on Children’s Life Satisfaction: Evidence from Longitudinal Data for England (2009–2018)

    Knies, Gundi

    Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 23 (2022), Iss. 4 P.1469

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00457-3 [Citations: 7]
  12. Essays in Applied Economics

    Brodeur, Abel

    SSRN Electronic Journal , Vol. (2015), Iss.

    https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3024181 [Citations: 0]
  13. Better to Grow Up Poor in a Richer Place? Social Housing, Neighbourhood Comparisons, and English Teenagers’ Well-Being

    Bezzo, Franco Bonomi | Vanhuysse, Pieter

    Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 25 (2024), Iss. 3

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00740-z [Citations: 0]
  14. Income Comparisons Among Neighbours and Satisfaction in East and West Germany

    Knies, Gundi

    Social Indicators Research, Vol. 106 (2012), Iss. 3 P.471

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9818-5 [Citations: 28]

Abstract

We test empirically whether people's life satisfaction depends on their relative income position in the neighbourhood, drawing on a unique dataset, the German Socioeconomic Panel Study (SOEP) matched with micro-marketing indicators of population characteristics. Relative deprivation theory suggests that individuals are happier the better their relative income position in the neighbourhood is. To test this theory we estimate micro-economic happiness models for the years 1994 and 1999 with controls for own income and for neighbourhood income at the zip-code level (roughly 9,000 people). There exist no negative and no statistically significant associations between neighbourhood income and life satisfaction, which refutes relative deprivation theory. If anything, we find positive associations between neighbourhood income and happiness in all cross-sectional models and this is robust to a number of robustness tests, including adding in more controls for neighbourhood quality, changing the outcome variable, and interacting neighbourhood income with indicators that proxy the extent to which individuals may be assumed to interact with their neighbours. We argue that the scale at which we measure neighbourhood characteristics may be too large still to identify the comparison effect sought after.