Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Stubner, S., Wulf, T., Landau, C., Gietl, R. Buyouts in Familienunternehmen – eine Herausforderung für Private Equity. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 61(1–2), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.115
Stubner, Stephan; Wulf, Torsten; Landau, Christian and Gietl, Robert "Buyouts in Familienunternehmen – eine Herausforderung für Private Equity" ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 61.1–2, 2013, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.115
Stubner, Stephan/Wulf, Torsten/Landau, Christian/Gietl, Robert (2013): Buyouts in Familienunternehmen – eine Herausforderung für Private Equity, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, vol. 61, iss. 1–2, 115-135, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.61.1-2.115

Format

Buyouts in Familienunternehmen – eine Herausforderung für Private Equity

Stubner, Stephan | Wulf, Torsten | Landau, Christian | Gietl, Robert

ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 61 (2013), Iss. 1–2 : pp. 115–135

2 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Dr. Stephan Stubner, HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Lehrstuhl für Strategisches Management und Organisation, Jahnallee 59, D-04109 Leipzig, Deutschland.

Prof. Dr. Torsten Wulf, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Lehrstuhl für Strategisches und Internationales Management, Universitätsstraße 24, D-35037 Marburg, Deutschland.

Prof. Dr. Christian Landau, EBS Universität für Wirtschaft und Recht, Rheingaustraße 1, D-65375 Oestrich-Winkel, Deutschland.

Dr. Robert Gietl, PEG GmbH, Rudolf-Diesel-Straße 6, D-85221 Dachau, Deutschland.

Cited By

  1. Family businesses and non-family equity: literature review and avenues for future research

    Thiele, Felix K.

    Management Review Quarterly, Vol. 67 (2017), Iss. 1 P.31

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-017-0123-5 [Citations: 12]
  2. Private equity investors and family firms: The role of exit intentions and conflicts

    Prigge, Stefan | Thiele, Felix | Busse, Sven

    Corporate Ownership and Control, Vol. 15 (2018), Iss. 2 P.44

    https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv15i2art4 [Citations: 2]

References

  1. Achleitner, A. K. und Fingerle, C. H. (2003): Unternehmenswertsteigerung durch Management Buyout, EF Working Paper Series No. 01–03, München: Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies.  Google Scholar
  2. Achleitner, A. K., Herman, K., Lerner, J. und Lutz, E. (2010): Family Business and Private Equity: Conflict or Collaboration? The Case of Messer Griesheim, in: The Journal of Private Equity, 13 (3), 7–20.  Google Scholar
  3. Achleitner, A.K., Schraml, S. C. und Tappeiner, F. (2008): Private Equity in Familienunternehmen – Erfahrungen mit Minderheitsbeteiligungen, Norderstedt: Stiftung Familienunternehmen.  Google Scholar
  4. Allen, M. J. und Yen, W. M. (1979): Introduction to Measurement Theory, Monterey: Brooks/Cole.  Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. und Reeb, D. (2003): Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, in: Journal of Finance, 58 (3), 1301–1328.  Google Scholar
  6. Aronoff, C. E. und Ward, J. L. (1995): Family-owned businesses: A thing of the past or a model for the future?, in: Family Business Review, 8 (2), 121–130.  Google Scholar
  7. Barach, J. A., Gantisky, J., Carson, J. A. und Doochin, B. A. (1988): Entry of the next generation: Strategic challenges for family business, in: Journal of Small Business Management, 26 (2), 49–56.  Google Scholar
  8. Barney, J. B. (1991): Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99–120.  Google Scholar
  9. Berg, A. und Gottschalg, O. (2004): Wertsteigerungshebel in Buyout-Transaktionen, in: M&A Review, 5 (5), 207–212.  Google Scholar
  10. Birley, S. (2002): Attitudes of owner-managers’ children towards family and business issues, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26 (3), 5–19.  Google Scholar
  11. Birley, S. und Westhead, P. (1990): Private business sales environments in the United Kingdom, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 5 (2), 349–373.  Google Scholar
  12. Brockhaus, R. H. (1994): Entrepreneurship and family business research: Comparisons, critique and lessons, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19 (1), 25–38.  Google Scholar
  13. Brush, C. G. und Vanderwerf, P. A. (1992): A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 7 (2), 157–170.  Google Scholar
  14. Carney, M. (2005): Corporate governance and competitive advantage in familycontrolled firms, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (3), 249–265.  Google Scholar
  15. Chandler, G. N. und Hanks, S. H. (1993): Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: A validation study, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 8 (5), 391–408.  Google Scholar
  16. Chrisman, J., Chua, J. und Sharma, P. (1998): Important attributes of successors in family businesses: An exploratory study, in: Family Business Review, 11 (1), 19 –34.  Google Scholar
  17. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H. und Sharma, P. (2003): Current trends and future directions in family business management studies: Toward a theory of the family firm, Coleman White Paper Series, http://www.usasbe.org/knowledge/whitepapers/chrisman2003.pdf, 1. 11. 2011.  Google Scholar
  18. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., und Sharma, P. (1999): Defining the family business by behavior in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (4), 19–39.  Google Scholar
  19. Covin, J. G. and Slevin, D. P. (1989): Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments, in: Strategic Management Journal, 10 (1), 75–87.  Google Scholar
  20. Daily, C. M. und Dollinger, M. J. (1993): Alternative methodologies for identifying family- versus nonfamily-managed businesses, in: Journal of Small Business Management, 31 (2), 79–90.  Google Scholar
  21. Davis, P. (1983): Realizing the potential for the family business, in: Organizational Dynamics, 12 (1), 47–56.  Google Scholar
  22. Dawson, A. (2009): Private equity investment decisions in family firms: The role of human resources and agency costs, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (2), 189–199.  Google Scholar
  23. Dumas, C. (1992): Integrating the daughter into family business management, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16 (4), 41–55.  Google Scholar
  24. Dreux, D. R. (1992): Financing family businesses: alternatives to selling out or going public, in: Family Business Review, 5 (2), 233–237.  Google Scholar
  25. Dyer, W. (2003): The family: The missing variable in organizational research, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (4), 401–416.  Google Scholar
  26. Dyer, W. (2006): Examining the „family effect“ on firm performance, in: Family Business Review, 19 (4), 253–273.  Google Scholar
  27. Dyer,W. und Sanchez, M. (1998): Current state of family business theory and practice as reflected in Family Business Review 1988–1997, in: Family Business Review, 11, 287–295.  Google Scholar
  28. EVCA (2005): Private equity and generational change – The contribution of private equity to the succession of family businesses in Europe, Zaventem: EVCA.  Google Scholar
  29. Gallo, M. A. und Sveen, J. (1991): Internationalizing the Family Business: Facilitating and Restraining Factors, in: Family Business Review, 4 (2), 181–190.  Google Scholar
  30. Geeraerts, G. (1984): The effect of ownership on the organization structure in small firms, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (2), 232–237.  Google Scholar
  31. Goffee, R. und Scase, R. (1985): Proprietorial control in family firms: Some functions of ‚quasi-organic‘ management systems, in: Journal of Management Studies, 22 (1), 52–68.  Google Scholar
  32. Habbershon, T. G. und Williams, M. L. (1999): A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms, in: Family Business Review, 12 (1), 1–25.  Google Scholar
  33. Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M. L. und MacMillan, I. C. (2003): A unified systems theory of family firm performance, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (4), 451–465.  Google Scholar
  34. Handler,W. C. (1989): Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses, in: Family Business Review, 2 (3), 257–276.  Google Scholar
  35. Handler,W. C. (1990): Succession in family firms: A mutual role adjustment between entrepreneur and next-generation family members, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15 (1), 37–51.  Google Scholar
  36. Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M. and Sorenson, R. (2006): Achieving sustained competitive advantage: A family capital theory, in: Family Business Review, 19 (2), 135–145.  Google Scholar
  37. Horton, T. P. (1986): Managing in a family way, in: Management Review, 75(2), 3.  Google Scholar
  38. Howorth, C., Westhead, P. und Wright, M. (2004): Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 19 (4), 509–534.  Google Scholar
  39. Kaplan, S. N. und Schoar, A. (2005): Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence, and Capital Flows, in: Journal of Finance, 60 (4), 1791–1823.  Google Scholar
  40. Kepner, E. (1991): The Family and the Firm: A Coevolutionary Perspective, in: Family Business Review, 4 (4), 445–461.  Google Scholar
  41. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1993): The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news, in: Organizational Dynamics, 21 (3), 59–71.  Google Scholar
  42. Klein, S., Astrachan, J. und Smyrnios, K. (2005): The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (3), 321–339.  Google Scholar
  43. Klein, S. B. und Bell, F. A. (2007): Non-family executives in family businesses: A literature review, in: Electronic Journal of Family Business Studies, 1 (1), 19–37.  Google Scholar
  44. Jensen, M. C. (1989): Eclipse of the public corporation, in: Harvard Business Review, 67 (5), 61–74.  Google Scholar
  45. Lansberg, I. (1988): The succession conspiracy, in: Family Business Review, 1 (2), 119–143.  Google Scholar
  46. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. und Shleifer, A. (1999): Corporate ownership around the world, in: Journal of Finance, 54 (2), 471–517.  Google Scholar
  47. Le Breton-Miller, I. und Miller, D. (2006): Why do some family businesses outcompete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30 (6), 731–746.  Google Scholar
  48. Lee, C., Lee, K. und Pennings, J. M. (2001): Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures, in: Strategic Management Journal, 22, 615–640.  Google Scholar
  49. Levinson, H. (1974): Don’t choose your own successor, in: Harvard Business Review, 52 (6), 53–62.  Google Scholar
  50. Linnemann, C. (2007): Deutscher Mittelstand vom Aussterben bedroht? Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bank Research.  Google Scholar
  51. Love, L. G., Priem, R. L. und Lumpkin, G. T. (2002): Explicitly articulated strategy and firm performance under alternative levels of centralization, in: Journal of Management, 28 (5), 611–627.  Google Scholar
  52. Lubatkin, M. H., Schulze, W. S., Ling, Y. und Dino, R. N. (2005): The effects of parental altuism on the governance of family-managed firms, in: Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26 (3), 313–330.  Google Scholar
  53. MacMillan, I. C., Kulow, D. M. und Khoylian, R. (1989): Venture capitalists’ involvement in their investments: Extent and performance, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 4 (1), 27–47.  Google Scholar
  54. Manigart, S., Waele, K. D., Wright, M., Robbie, K., Desbrières, P., Sapienza, H. J. und Beekman, A. (2000): Venture Capitalists, Investment Appraisal and Accounting Information: A Comparative Study of the US, UK, France, Belgium and Holland, in: European Financial Management, 3 (6), 389–403.  Google Scholar
  55. Meier, D. (2005): Post-investment value addition to buyouts, Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.  Google Scholar
  56. Meulemann, M., Amess, K., Wright, M. und Scholes, L. (2008): Agency, Strategic Entrepreneurship and the performance of private equity backed buyouts, Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2008/ 05.  Google Scholar
  57. Miller, D. und Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006): Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities, in: Family Business Review, 19 (1), 73–87.  Google Scholar
  58. Moores, K. (2009): Paradigms and theory building in the domain of business families, in: Family Business Review, 22 (2), 167–180.  Google Scholar
  59. Muscarella, C. J. und Vetsuypens, M. R. (1990): Efficiency and organizational structure: A study of reverse LBOs, in: Journal of Finance, 45 (5), 1389–1413.  Google Scholar
  60. Mustakallio, M.A., Autio, E. und Zahra, S.A. (2002): Relational and Contractual Governance in Family Firms – Effects on Strategic Decision Making, in: Family Business Review, 15 (3), 205–222.  Google Scholar
  61. Pyromalis, V. D., Vozikis, G. S., Kalkanteras, T. A., Rogdaki, M. E. und Sigalas, G. P. (2006): An integrated framework for testing the success of the family business succession process according to gender specificity, in: Poutziouris, P. Z., Smyrnios, K. X. und Klein, S. B. (2006): Handbook of research on family business, Edward Elgar: Massachusetts, 422–442.  Google Scholar
  62. Sapienza, H. J., Manigart, S. und Vermeir, W. (1996): Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries, in: Journal of Business Venturing, 11 (6), 439–469.  Google Scholar
  63. Schaaf, J. (2005): Private Equity in Europa: Buy-outs stützen Wachstum, Gründungsfinanzierung abgestürzt, in: Economics. Digitale Ökonomie und struktureller Wandel, Frankfurt /Main: Deutsche Bank Research.  Google Scholar
  64. Scholes, L., Westhead, P. und Burrows, A. (2008): Family firm succession: The management buy-out and buy-in routes, in: Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15 (1), 8–30.  Google Scholar
  65. Scholes, L., Wright, M., Westhead, P. und Bruining, H. (2010): Strategic Changes in family firms post management buyout: Ownership and governance issues, in: International Small Business Journal, 28 (5), 505–521.  Google Scholar
  66. Scholes, L., Wright, M., Westhead, P., Bruining, H. und Klöckner, O. (2009): Family-Firm Buyouts, Private Equity, and Strategic Change, in: Journal of Private Equity, Frühling 2009, 7–18.  Google Scholar
  67. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N. und Buchholtz, A. K. (2001): Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence, in: Organization Science, 12 (2), 99–116.  Google Scholar
  68. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J. und Chua, J. H. (1997): Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges, in: Family Business Review, 10 (1), 1–35.  Google Scholar
  69. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., Pablo, A. L. und Chua, J. H. (2001): Determinants of initial satisfaction with the succession process in family firms: A conceptual model, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25 (39), 17–35.  Google Scholar
  70. Sirmon, D. G. und Hitt, M. A. (2003): Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms, in: Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27 (4), 339–358.  Google Scholar
  71. Stavrou, E. T. (1999): Succession in family businesses: Exploring the effects of demographic factors on offspring intentions to join and take over the business, in: Journal of Small Business Management, 37 (3), 43–61.  Google Scholar
  72. Steier, L. (2001): Next-generation entrepreneurs and succession: An exploratory study of modes and means of managing social capital, in: Family Business Review, 14 (3), 259–276.  Google Scholar
  73. Stern, M. H. (1986): Inside the family-held business, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovic.  Google Scholar
  74. Tagiuri, R. und Davis, J. (1996): Bivalent Attributes of the Family Firm, in: Family Business Review, 9 (2), 199–208.  Google Scholar
  75. Upton, N., Teal, E. J. und Felan, J. T. (2001): Strategic and business planning practices of fast growth family firms, in: Journal of Small Business Management, 39 (1), 60–72.  Google Scholar
  76. Vera, C. F. und Dean, M. A. (2005): An examination of the challenges daughters face in family business succession, in: Family Business Review, 18 (4), 321–345.  Google Scholar
  77. Ward, J. L. (1988): The special role of strategic planning for family businesses, in: Family Business Review, 1 (2), 105–117.  Google Scholar
  78. Wernerfelt, B. (1984): A resource-based view of the firm, in: Strategic Management Journal, 5 (2), 171–180.  Google Scholar
  79. Wright, M., Hoskisson, R., Busenitz, L. und Dial, J. (2001): Finance and management buyouts: Agency versus entrepreneurship perspectives, in: Venture Capital, 3 (3), 239–261.  Google Scholar
  80. Wright, M., Robbie, K., Thompson, S. und Starkey, K. (1994): Longevity and the life-cycle of management buy-outs, in: Strategic Management Journal, 15 (3), 215–227.  Google Scholar
  81. Wright, M., Scholes, L., Ball, R., Howorth, C., Kloeckner, O., Westhead, P. und Burrows, A. (2008): Private Equity in Family Firms – A Report on Private Equity Investments in Family Firms across Europe, Nottingham: The Centre for Management Buy-out Research.  Google Scholar
  82. Zahra, S. und Filatotchev, I. (2004): Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective, in: Journal of Management Studies, 41 (5), 885–898.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Family firm succession via a sale to a private equity company has recently gained in importance throughout Europe. During the investment period, private equity companies typically try to increase the value of their portfolio company through active involvement in its management. Based on the resource based view and family systems theory we show that such a behavior will be unsuccessful if the portfolio company is a former family firm. We empirically test our hypotheses on a sample of 118 European family firm buyouts and find support for our argumentation. With our study we add to family firm succession research by highlighting that acquirers that are not able to utilize the specific resources and competencies of family firms will not be able to have a positive impact on its performance. We also add to the private equity literature as we show that private equity companies should take a differentiated approach for their value adding activities when they invest in a family firm.