Menu Expand

Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896–1938

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch
  4. Vol. 138, Issue 3–4
  5. pp. 185–197

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
McAdam, M., Kolev, S., Dekker, E. Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896–1938. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 138(3–4), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.138.3-4.185
McAdam, Mark; Kolev, Stefan and Dekker, Erwin "Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896–1938" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 138.3–4, 2018, 185-197. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.138.3-4.185
McAdam, Mark/Kolev, Stefan/Dekker, Erwin (2018): Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896–1938, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 138, iss. 3–4, 185-197, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.138.3-4.185
Format
Download

Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896–1938

McAdam, Mark | Kolev, Stefan | Dekker, Erwin

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 138 (2018), Iss. 3–4 : pp. 185–197

7 Citations (CrossRef)

Read Now Download (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.138.3-4.185
Language
English
Pages
13

Author Details

McAdam, Mark, School of Economic Disciplines, University of Siegen. Kohlbettstr. 17, 57068 Siegen, Germany.

Kolev, Stefan, Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Applied Sciences Zwickau. Kornmarkt 1, 08056 Zwickau, Germany.

Dekker, Erwin, School of History, Culture, and Communication, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Woudestein Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Cited By

  1. Max Weber and Ordoliberalism: How Weber’s Kulturkritik Contributed to the Foundation of Ordoliberal Socio-Economic Thought

    Oakes, Isabel

    Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 140 (2020), Iss. 2 P.177

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.140.2.177 [Citations: 1]

  2. An “Ordo-Thinker” on the Left: Jan Tinbergen on the National and International Economic Order

    Dekker, Erwin

    History of Political Economy, Vol. 54 (2022), Iss. 4 P.689

    https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-9895888 [Citations: 4]

  3. Carl Menger’s Smithian contributions to German political economy

    Kolev, Stefan | Dekker, Erwin

    The Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 36 (2023), Iss. 2 P.247

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-022-00602-y [Citations: 3]

  4. Max Weber, Contextual Economics, and Schmollers Jahrbuch

    Goldschmidt, Nils | Kolev, Stefan | Störring, Matthias

    Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 140 (2020), Iss. 2 P.111

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.140.2.111 [Citations: 1]

  5. Gustav Schmoller and the Idea of a Social Market Economy: A Precursor to Ordoliberalism?

    Störring, Matthias | Goldschmidt, Nils

    ORDO, Vol. 72-73 (2023), Iss. 1 P.85

    https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2023-2007 [Citations: 0]

  6. WHEN LIBERTY PRESUPPOSES ORDER: F. A. HAYEK’S CONTEXTUAL ORDOLIBERALISM

    Kolev, Stefan

    Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 46 (2024), Iss. 2 P.288

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837223000214 [Citations: 2]

  7. Introduction to Special Issue “The Jahrbuch: The First 150 Years”

    Grudev, Lachezar | Kolev, Stefan

    Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 141 (2021), Iss. 4 P.273

    https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.4.273 [Citations: 0]

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. and J. A. Robinson. 2019. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin Press.  Google Scholar
  2. Ashford, R. 2004. “What Is Socioeconomics?” San Diego Law Review 41 (5): 5–10.  Google Scholar
  3. Backhaus, J. G. 2003. “Gustav Schmoller and the Problems of Today.” History of Economic Ideas 1 (2): 3–25.  Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R. E. and P. Martin. 1999. “Two Waves of Globalisation: Superficial Similarities, Fundamental Differences.” NBER Working Paper No. 6904.  Google Scholar
  5. Biddle, J. E. and D. S. ?Hamermesh. 2017. “Theory and Measurement: Emergence, Consolidation, and Erosion of a Consensus.” History of Political Economy 49 (Annual Supplement): 34–57.  Google Scholar
  6. Brintzinger, K.-R. 1996. Die Nationalökonomie an den Universitäten Freiburg, Heidelberg und Tübingen 1918–1945: Eine institutionenhistorische, vergleichende Studie der wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultäten und Abteilungen südwestdeutscher Universitäten. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.  Google Scholar
  7. Broadberry, S. and C. Burhop. 2010. “Real Wages and Labor Productivity in Britain and Germany, 1871–1938: A Unified Approach to the International Comparison of Living Standards.” Journal of Economic History 70 (2): 400–27.  Google Scholar
  8. Davis, J. B. and W. Dolfsma, eds. 2015. The Elgar Companion to Social Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.  Google Scholar
  9. Glaeser, J. 2014. Der Werturteilsstreit in der deutschen Nationalökonomie: Max Weber, Werner Sombart und die Ideale der Sozialpolitik. Marburg: Metropolis.  Google Scholar
  10. Goldschmidt, N., E. Grimmer-Solem, and J. Zweynert. 2016. “On the Purpose and Aims of the Journal of Contextual Economics.” Schmollers Jahrbuch 136 (1): 1–14.  Google Scholar
  11. Halbweiss, W. W. 1983. Politische Ökonomie: Entwicklung und Wandlungen. Freiburg: Haufe.  Google Scholar
  12. Hedtke, R., ed. 2015. Was ist und wozu Sozioökonomie? Wiesbaden: Springer VS.  Google Scholar
  13. Hellmich, S. ?N. 2017. “What is Socioeconomics? An Overview of Theories, Methods, and Themes in the Field.” Forum for Social Economics 46 (1): 3–25.  Google Scholar
  14. Hutchison, T. W. 1988. “Gustav Schmoller and the Problems of Today.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 144 (3): 527–31.  Google Scholar
  15. Kolev, S. ?2018. “Early Economic Sociology and Contextual Economics: The Weber-Wieser Connection.” Journal of Contextual Economics–Schmollers Jahrbuch 138 (1): 1–30.  Google Scholar
  16. Koopmans, T. C. 1947. “Measurement without Theory.” Review of Economics and Statistics 29 (3): 161–72.  Google Scholar
  17. McAdam, M. and M. Störring. 2016. “Bringing Schmoller to America: Notes on the Translation of ‘The Idea of Justice in Political Economy.’” Schmollers Jahrbuch 136 (4): 361–76.  Google Scholar
  18. Mikl-Horke, G. 2011. “Was ist Sozioökonomie? Von der Sozialökonomie der Klassiker zur Sozioökonomie der Gegenwart.” In Sozioökonomie: Die Rückkehr der Wirtschaft in die Gesellschaft, edited by G. Mikl-Horke, 19–57. Marburg: Metropolis.  Google Scholar
  19. Milford, K. 2015. “Zur Entwicklung der Volkswirtschaftslehre an der Universität Wien von 1763 bis 1976.” In Reflexive Innensichten aus der Universität: Disziplinengeschichten zwischen Wissenschaft, Gesellschaft und Politik, edited by K. A. Fröschl, G. B. Müller, T. Olechowski, and B. Schmidt-Lauber, 341–54. Göttingen: V&R unipress.  Google Scholar
  20. Müller, K. O. W. 1994. “Zum Vermächtnis der sozialrechtlichen Schule der Nationalökonomie: Überlegungen zum Werk Karl Diehls.” Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte 35 (2): 121–30.  Google Scholar
  21. Rohac, D. 2019. In Defense of Globalism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.  Google Scholar
  22. Schmoller, G. 1881. “Ueber Zweck und Ziele des Jahrbuchs.” Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirthschaft im Deutschen Reich 5 (1): 1–18.  Google Scholar
  23. Seager, H. R. 1893. “Economics at Berlin and Vienna.” Journal of Political Economy 1 (2): 236–62.  Google Scholar
  24. Senn, P. 1989. “What Has Happened to Gustav von Schmoller in English?” History of Economics Society Bulletin 11 (2): 252–95.  Google Scholar
  25. Simon, N., ed. 1998. Duncker & Humblot: Verlagsbibliographie 1798–1945. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.  Google Scholar
  26. Streissler, E. W. 1990. “The Influence of German Economics on the Work of Menger and Marshall.” In Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics, edited by B. J. Caldwell, 31–68. Durham: Duke University Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Tribe, K. 2014. “What is Social Economics?” History of European Ideas 40 (5): 714–33.  Google Scholar
  28. Wegner, G. 2020. “Reassessing the Dependence of Capitalism on Democracy–The Case of Imperial Germany and the Weimar Republic.” Journal of Institutional Economics 16 (3): 337–54.  Google Scholar
  29. Zweynert, J. 2013. “How German is German Neo-liberalism?” Review of Austrian Economics 26 (2): 109–25.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Mark McAdam / Stefan Kolev / Erwin Dekker: Methods for Understanding Economic Change: Socio-Economics and German Political Economy, 1896 –1938 1
1. Introduction to the Translations of Selected Classicsfrom Schmollers Jahrbuch 1
2. Motivation for Our Text Selection 5
3. Comments on the Translation Processand Editorial Decisions 1
4. Acknowledgments 1
References 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.