Menu Expand

Liberalism beyond Hayek: On the Renewal of Liberalism and the Institutional Infrastructure of Freedom

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Nordbakken, L. Liberalism beyond Hayek: On the Renewal of Liberalism and the Institutional Infrastructure of Freedom. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 139(2–4), 305-324. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.305
Nordbakken, Lars Peder "Liberalism beyond Hayek: On the Renewal of Liberalism and the Institutional Infrastructure of Freedom" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 139.2–4, 2019, 305-324. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.305
Nordbakken, Lars Peder (2019): Liberalism beyond Hayek: On the Renewal of Liberalism and the Institutional Infrastructure of Freedom, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 139, iss. 2–4, 305-324, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.305

Format

Liberalism beyond Hayek: On the Renewal of Liberalism and the Institutional Infrastructure of Freedom

Nordbakken, Lars Peder

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 139 (2019), Iss. 2–4 : pp. 305–324

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Nordbakken, Lars Peder, Civita, Akersgaten 20, N-0158, Oslo, Norway.

Cited By

  1. DUAL ARGUMENT, DOUBLE TRUTH: ON THE CONTINUED IMPORTANCE OF THE STATE IN NEOLIBERAL THOUGHT

    Innset, Ola

    Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 45 (2023), Iss. 4 P.647

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S105383722200044X [Citations: 0]

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. and J. A. Robinson. 2019. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies and the Fate of Liberty. New York: Penguin.  Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. C. 1997. Raymond Aron: The Recovery of the Political. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.  Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, G. and J. M. Buchanan. 2000 [1985]. The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  4. Buchanan, J. M. 1978. The Economics of Politics. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.  Google Scholar
  5. Crouch, C. 2013. Making Capitalism Fit for Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.  Google Scholar
  6. Dahrendorf, R. 1979. Lebenschancen: Anläufe zur sozialen und politischen Theorie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.  Google Scholar
  7. Dahrendorf, R. 2014 [1990]. Reflections on the Revolution in Europe. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.  Google Scholar
  8. Dahrendorf, R. 2003. Auf der Suche nach einer neuen Ordnung: Vorlesungen zur Politik der Freiheit im 21. Jahrhundert. Munich: C. H. Beck.  Google Scholar
  9. Dahrendorf, R. 2004. Der Wiederbeginn der Geschichte. Munich: C. H. Beck.  Google Scholar
  10. Dahrendorf, R. 2007. “Freiheit eine Definition.” In Welche Freiheit: Plädoyers für eine offene Gesellschaft, edited by U. Ackermann, 27 – 39. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.  Google Scholar
  11. Ebenstein, A. 2003. Hayek’s Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  12. Einaudi, L. 2014. Selected Political Essays, Vol. 3. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  13. Eucken, W. 2004 [1952]. Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.  Google Scholar
  14. Gamble, A. 1996. Hayek: The Iron Cage of Liberty. Cambridge: Polity Press.  Google Scholar
  15. Hayek. F. A. 1939. Freedom and the Economic System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  16. Hayek, F. A. 1976 [1944]. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  17. Hayek, F. A. 1976 [1960]. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  18. Hayek, F. A. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  19. Hayek, F. A. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty: Rules and Order, Vol. 1. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  20. Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Mirage of Social Justice, Vol. 2. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  21. Hayek, F. A. 1978. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  22. Hayek, F. A. 1979. Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Political Order of a Free People, Vol. 3. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  23. Hayek, F. A. 1990 [1988]. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  24. Hayek, F. A. 1994. Hayek on Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  25. Karlson, N. 2018. Statecraft and Liberal Reform in Advanced Democracies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  26. Lindsey, B. and S. T. Teles. 2017. The Captured Economy: How the Powerful Enrich Themselves, Slow Down Growth, and Increase Inequality. New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Lippmann, W. 1943 [1937]. The Good Society. Guildford: Billing and Sons.  Google Scholar
  28. Mises, L. v. 1969 [1957]. Theory and History: An Interpretation of Social and Economic Evolution. New Rochelle: Arlington House.  Google Scholar
  29. Mjeldheim, L. 2006. Den gylne mellomvegen: Tema frå Venstres historie 1905 – 1940. Bergen: Vigmostad Bjørke.  Google Scholar
  30. Müller, J.-W. 2011. Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europa. New Haven: Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  31. Nordbakken, L. P. 2006. Muligheter for alle: Dynamisk vekst i en liberal markedsøkonomi. Oslo: Civita.  Google Scholar
  32. Nordbakken, L. P. 2017. Liberale tenkere for vår tid. Oslo: Civita.  Google Scholar
  33. North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  34. Plickert, P. 2008. Wandlungen des Neoliberalismus: Eine Studie zu Entwicklung und Ausstrahlung der “Mont Pèlerin Society”. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.  Google Scholar
  35. Polanyi, M. 1998 [1951]. The Logic of Liberty. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.  Google Scholar
  36. Popper, K. R. 1974 [1945]. The Open Society and its Enemies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  37. Popper, K. R. 1972 [1963]. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  38. Reinhoudt, J. and S. Audier. 2018. The Walter Lippmann Colloquium: The Birth of Neo-Liberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  39. Röpke, W. 1947. Das Kulturideal des Liberalismus. Frankfurt: G. Schulte-Bulmke.  Google Scholar
  40. Röpke, W. 1996 [1948]. The Moral Foundations of Civil Society. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.  Google Scholar
  41. Röpke, W. 1960. A Humane Economy: The Social Framework of the Free Market. London: Oswald Wolff.  Google Scholar
  42. Rüstow, A. 2009 [1939]. “Die Defizite des Liberalismus.” In Die Religion der Marktwirtschaft, edited by Walter Eucken Archiv, 17 – 41. Münster: LIT Verlag.  Google Scholar
  43. Schumpeter, J. A. 1976 [1942]. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.  Google Scholar
  44. Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. London: Allen Lane.  Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper suggests that the challenge to renew liberalism today may be seen to share some similarities with the first attempt to renew liberalism at the Colloque Walter Lippmann in 1938. Besides sharing intellectual, political and institutional dimensions, liberalism is once again under severe attack on many fronts, and it is once again seen by many to suffer a combined legitimacy and effectiveness crisis, reminding us of the main topic discussed in 1938. The first central argument of the paper is to show why a realistic and inclusive conception of liberty needs to be grounded in an extended institutional infrastructure of freedom, based on the interdependent and balanced relations between its four major institutional pillars: the rule of law, democracy, the market economy and civil society. Following this discussion, the paper challenges Friedrich Hayek’s attempt to rebuild liberalism based on a narrower conception of liberty and its institutional preconditions. The paper concludes by underpinning the need to move beyond Hayek in the renewal of liberalism in our time.