Menu Expand

Liberal Order in the Twenty-First Century: Searching for Eunomia Once Again

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch
  4. Vol. 139, Issue 2–4
  5. pp. 271–284

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Magen, A. Liberal Order in the Twenty-First Century: Searching for Eunomia Once Again. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 139(2–4), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.271
Magen, Amichai "Liberal Order in the Twenty-First Century: Searching for Eunomia Once Again" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 139.2–4, 2019, 271-284. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.271
Magen, Amichai (2019): Liberal Order in the Twenty-First Century: Searching for Eunomia Once Again, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 139, iss. 2–4, 271-284, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.271
Format
Download

Liberal Order in the Twenty-First Century: Searching for Eunomia Once Again

Magen, Amichai

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 139 (2019), Iss. 2–4 : pp. 271–284

Read Now Download (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.271
Language
English
Pages
14
Keywords

Author Details

Magen, Amichai, Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy & Strategy, IDC Herzliya, P. O. Box 167, Herzliya, 4610101, Israel.

References

  1. Bell, D. 2014. “What Is Liberalism?” Political Theory 42 (6): 682 – 715.  Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Middlesex: Penguin Books.  Google Scholar
  3. Bosley, C. C. 2017. “The ‘New’ Normal: Instability Risk Assessment in an Uncertainty-Based Strategic Environment.” International Studies Review 19 (2): 206 – 27.  Google Scholar
  4. Brands, H. and C. Edel. 2019. The Lessons of Tragedy: Statecraft and World Order. New Haven: Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  5. Buchan, R. 2013. International Law and the Construction of the Liberal Peace. Oxford: Hart.  Google Scholar
  6. Cederman, L. E. and N. B. Weidmann. 2017. “Predicting Armed Conflict: Time to Adjust Our Expectations?” Science 355 (6324): 474 – 6.  Google Scholar
  7. Danaher, J. 2016. “The Threat of Algocracy: Reality, Resistance and Accommodation.” Philosophy and Technology 29 (3): 245 – 68.  Google Scholar
  8. Davies, S. 2019. The Wealth Explosion: The Nature and Origins of Modernity. Brighton: EER Publishing.  Google Scholar
  9. Deneen, P. 2018. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  10. Diamond, L. 2008. The Spirit of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World. New York: Times Books.  Google Scholar
  11. Diamond, L. 2019. Ill Winds: Saving Democracy from Russian Rage, Chinese Ambition, and American Complacency. New York: Penguin Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Diamond, L. and L. Morlino, eds. 2005. Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.  Google Scholar
  13. Emmott, B. 2018. The Fate of the West: The Battle to Save the World’s Most Successful Political Idea. London: The Economist Books.  Google Scholar
  14. Financial Times. 2019. “Vladimir Putin Says Liberalism has ‘Become Obsolete’.” June 28, 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/670039ec-98f3-11e9-9573-ee5cbb98ed36.  Google Scholar
  15. Fox, R. 2011. The Tribal Imagination: Civilization and the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  16. Fukuyama, F. 2011. The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.  Google Scholar
  17. Gellner, E. 1988. Plough, Sword, and Book. Chicago: Chicago University Press.  Google Scholar
  18. Goldberg, J. 2018. Suicide of the West. New York: Crown Forum.  Google Scholar
  19. Haas, R. 2017. A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. New York: Penguin Press.  Google Scholar
  20. Habermas, J. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Harari, Y. N. 2018. “Why Technology Favors Tyranny.” The Atlantic, October 2018.  Google Scholar
  22. Hathaway, O. A. and S. J. Shapiro. 2017. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. New York: Simon & Schuster.  Google Scholar
  23. Jones, Z. M. and Y. Lupu. 2018. “Is There More Violence in the Middle?” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 652 – 67.  Google Scholar
  24. Kagan, R. 2019. The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.  Google Scholar
  25. Kahan, A. 2020. The Three Pillars of Liberalism: Freedom, Markets, and Morals from the Enlightenment to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press, forthcoming.  Google Scholar
  26. Kaplan, R. D. 2018. The Return of Marco Polo’s World. New York: Random House.  Google Scholar
  27. King, S. D. 2017. Grave New World: The End of Globalization and the Return of History. New Haven: Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  28. Kirk, R. 2003. The Roots of American Order. Wilmington: ISI Books.  Google Scholar
  29. Kissinger, H. 2014. World Order. New York: Penguin Books.  Google Scholar
  30. Krastev, I. 2014. Democracy Disrupted: The Politics of Global Protest. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  Google Scholar
  31. Lake, D. A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.  Google Scholar
  32. Lau, L. J. 2019. The China-U.S. Trade War and Their Future Economic Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.  Google Scholar
  33. Lilla, M. 2017. The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics. New York: Harper.  Google Scholar
  34. Lukianoff, G. and J. Haidt. 2018. The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure. New York: Penguin Press.  Google Scholar
  35. Magen, A. 2018a. “Fighting Terrorism: The Democracy Advantage.” Journal of Democracy 29 (1): 111 – 25.  Google Scholar
  36. Magen, A. 2018b. “After Merkel: Can Germany Rescue Europe, and Itself?” Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 12 (3): 349 – 56.  Google Scholar
  37. Margolis, E. 2010. “Understanding Political Stability and Instability.” Civil Wars 12 (3): 326 – 45.  Google Scholar
  38. McCloskey, D. N. 2016. Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions Enriched the World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.  Google Scholar
  39. Mounk, Y. 2018. The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  40. Murray, D. 2017. The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam. London: Bloomsbury.  Google Scholar
  41. Nye, J. S. 1995. “East Asia: The Case for Deep Engagement.” Foreign Affairs 74 (4): 90 – 102.  Google Scholar
  42. Owen, J. M. 2010. The Clash of Ideas in World Politics: Transnational Networks, States, and Regime Change, 1510 – 2010. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  43. Phillips, A. 2011. War, Religion, and Empire: The Transformation of International Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  44. Rosenblatt, H. 2018. The Lost History of Liberalism: From Ancient Rome to the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  45. Runciman, D. 2019. How Democracy Ends. London: Profile Books.  Google Scholar
  46. Russett, B. and J. Oneal. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organization. New York: Norton Press.  Google Scholar
  47. Shklar, J. N. 1989. “The Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, edited by N. Rosenblum, 21 – 44. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  48. Simmons, B. A., F. Dobbins, and G. Garrett, eds. 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  49. Waltz, K. N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.  Google Scholar
  50. Weil, S. 2002. The Needs for Roots. Abingdon: Routledge Classics.  Google Scholar
  51. Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  52. Youngs, R. 2018. Europe Reset: New Directions for the EU. London: Tauris.  Google Scholar
  53. Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Adherents of economic and political liberty are again compelled to ask fundamental questions about the nature and prospects of good order (or Eunomia). This article: (1) offers a quaternary definition of the concept of “order;” (2) contends that Eunomia is essentially about the creation, adaptation, and protection of the conditions necessary for human beings to live lives that are free from fear so as to maximize each individual’s unique potential for human flourishing; and (3) outlines an evolutionary understanding of Eunomia, whereby contemporary liberal orders represent the cumulative outcome of three sets of elite-selected “wins” over illiberal ones. To survive and thrive in the twenty-first century liberalism must once again contest and defeat rival orders.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Liberal Order in the Twenty-First Century: Searching for Eunomia Once Again 271
By Amichai Magen 271
Abstract 271
1. Introduction 271
2. Order 273
2.1 Rules and Arrangements 274
2.2 Coercive Power 274
2.3 Legitimacy 275
2.4 Ontological Narrative 275
3. Liberal Order 277
4. Order Contestation and Selection: Liberal Orders as Serial Solution-Structures 278
5. Conclusion 271
References 271

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.