Menu Expand



Dekker, E. Is There an Agenda of Neoliberal Emancipation?. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 139(2–4), 213-224.
Dekker, Erwin "Is There an Agenda of Neoliberal Emancipation?" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 139.2–4, 2019, 213-224.
Dekker, Erwin (2019): Is There an Agenda of Neoliberal Emancipation?, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 139, iss. 2–4, 213-224, [online]


Is There an Agenda of Neoliberal Emancipation?

Dekker, Erwin

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 139 (2019), Iss. 2–4 : pp. 213–224

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Dekker, Erwin, Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands.


  1. Becker, G. S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S. 1993. “The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (3): 385 – 409.  Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S., F. Ewald, and B. E. Harcourt. 2011. “Becker on Ewald on Foucault on Becker: American Neoliberalism & Michel Foucault’s 1979 Birth of Biopolitics Lectures.” Carceral Notebooks: Neoliberalism and Risk 7: 1 – 35.  Google Scholar
  4. Behrent, M. C. 2009. “Liberalism Without Humanism: Michel Foucault and the Free-Market Creed, 1976 – 1979.” Modern Intellectual History 6 (3): 539 – 68.  Google Scholar
  5. Böhm, F., W. Eucken, and H. Großmann-Doerth. 1989. “The Ordo Manifesto of 1936.” In Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution, edited by A. Peacock and H. Willgerodt, 15 – 26. New York: St. Martin’s Press.  Google Scholar
  6. Boltanski, L. and E. Chiapello. 2005. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.  Google Scholar
  7. Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. New York: Zone Books.  Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, J. M. 2005. “Afraid to Be Free.” Public Choice 124: 19 – 31.  Google Scholar
  9. Buchanan, J. M., and V. J. Vanberg. 1991. “The Market as a Creative Process.” Economics and Philosophy 7 (2): 167 – 86.  Google Scholar
  10. Burgin, A. 2012. The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free Markets since the Depression. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  11. Caplan, B. 2018. The Case Against Education: Why the Education System Is a Waste of Time and Money. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Cooper, M. 2017. Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism. Cambridge: MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  13. Dekker, E. 2016. The Viennese Students of Civilization: The Meaning and Context of Austrian Economics Reconsidered. New York: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  14. Dekker, E. 2019. “On Emancipators, Engineers, and Students: The Appropriate Attitude of the Economist.” Review of Austrian Economics 33 (1/2): 55 – 68.  Google Scholar
  15. Grudev, L. 2018. “The Secondary Depression: An Integral Part of Wilhelm Röpke’s Business Cycle Theory.” In Wilhelm Röpke (1899 – 1966): A Liberal Political Economist and Conservative Social Philosopher, edited by P. Commun and S. Kolev, 133 – 54. Cham: Springer.  Google Scholar
  16. Hayek, F. A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Hayek, F. A. 1948. Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  18. Hayek, F. A. 1978. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” In New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, 179 – 90. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  19. Hayek, F. A. 1982. “The Three Sources of Human Values.” In Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Political Order of a Free People, Vol. 3, 153 – 76. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  20. Hayek, F. A. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, Vol. 1, edited by W. W. Bartley III. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  21. Kolev, S. 2015. “Ordoliberalism and the Austrian School.” In The Oxford Handbook of Austrian Economics, edited by P. J. Boettke and C. J. Coyne, 419 – 44. New York: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  22. Kukathas, C. 2003. The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  23. Mises, L. v. 1978. Notes and Recollections. South Holland: Libertarian Press.  Google Scholar
  24. Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State & Utopia. New York: Basic Books.  Google Scholar
  25. Olsen, N. 2019. The Sovereign Consumer: A New Intellectual History of Neoliberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  26. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Ostrom, V. 1997. The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies: A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.  Google Scholar
  28. Popper, K. R. 1945a. The Open Society and Its Enemies: The Spell of Plato, Vol. 1. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  29. Popper, K. R. 1945b. The Open Society and Its Enemies: The High Tide of Prophecy, Hegel, Marx and the Aftermath, Vol. 2. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  30. Reinhoudt, J. and S. Audier. 2018. The Walter Lippmann Colloquium: The Birth of Neo-Liberalism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  31. Röpke, W. 1948. Civitas Humana. London: William Hodge.  Google Scholar
  32. Röpke, W. 1950. The Social Crisis of Our Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  33. Rüstow, A. 1945. Das Versagen des Wirtschaftsliberalismus als religionsgeschichtliches Problem. Zurich: Europa Verlag.  Google Scholar
  34. Tinbergen, J. 1960. “The Place of Education in the Economy.” Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia 19 (1/2): 3 – 12.  Google Scholar
  35. Tinbergen, J. 1975. Income Distribution: Analysis and Policies. New York: North Holland.  Google Scholar
  36. Wieser, F. v. 1910. Recht und Macht: Sechs Vorträge. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.  Google Scholar


This paper argues that one of the weaknesses of the neoliberals of the 1940s was their failure to develop a positive program of individual emancipation. It is demonstrated that in conversation with the critics of neoliberalism (Foucault, Cooper, and others) such an agenda can be developed. To do so we should disentangle the neoliberal agenda from the conservative social agenda with which it has long been associated. It is argued that in particular the Chicago School approach to the individual and social conditions such as the modern workplace, online communities and city life provides inspiration for an agenda of neoliberal emancipation.