Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Boettke, PCandela, R (2019). Liberalism in Crisis and the Promise of a Reconstructed Liberalism. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 139(2-4), 189-212. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.189
Boettke, Peter J. Candela, RosolinoBoettke, Peter J. Candela, Rosolino (2019). "Liberalism in Crisis and the Promise of a Reconstructed Liberalism" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 139no. 2-4, 2019 pp. 189-212. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.189
Boettke, PCandela, R (2019). Liberalism in Crisis and the Promise of a Reconstructed Liberalism. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 139 (Issue 2-4), pp 189-212. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.139.2-4.189

Format

Liberalism in Crisis and the Promise of a Reconstructed Liberalism

Boettke, Peter J. | Candela, Rosolino

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 139 (2019), Iss. 2-4 : pp. 189–212

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Boettke, Peter J., Department of Economics and F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Buchanan Hall D109, PPE 1 A1, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

Candela, Rosolino, F. A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, Mercatus Center at George Mason University, Buchanan Hall D119, PPE 1 A1, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA.

References

  1. Best, G. D. 2005. “Introduction.” In The Good Society, by W. Lippmann, xxiii–xl. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.  Google Scholar
  2. Boettke, P. J. 2018a. “Economics and Public Administration.” Southern Economic Journal 84 (4): 938 – 59.  Google Scholar
  3. Boettke, P. J. 2018b. F. A. Hayek: Economics, Political Economy and Social Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  4. Boettke, P. J. and R. A. Candela. 2017a. “Price Theory as Prophylactic Against Popular Fallacies.” Journal of Institutional Economics 13 (3): 725 – 52.  Google Scholar
  5. Boettke, P. J. and R. A. Candela. 2017b. “The Liberty of Progress: Increasing Returns, Institutions, and Entrepreneurship.” Social Philosophy and Policy 34 (2): 136 – 63.  Google Scholar
  6. Boettke, P. J. and R. A. Candela. 2020a. “The Austrian School of Economics: A View from London.” Review of Austrian Economics 33 (1 – 2): 69 – 85.  Google Scholar
  7. Boettke, P. J. and R. A. Candela. 2020b. “Stigler on the Science of Economics: A Tale of Two Knights.” In George Stigler: Enigmatic Price Theorist of the Twentieth Century, edited by C. Freedman, 721 – 53. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  8. Boettke, P. J. and K. Vaughn. 2002. “Knight on Capital and the Problem of Socialism.” History of Political Economy 34 (1): 155 – 76.  Google Scholar
  9. Bowen, I. 1938. “‘The Good Society’ by Walter Lippmann.” Economic Journal 48 (192): 711 – 3.  Google Scholar
  10. Hayek, F. A. 1933 [1929]. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. London: Jonathan Cape.  Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F. A. 1931. Prices and Production. London: George Routledge & Sons.  Google Scholar
  12. Hayek, F. A. 1933. “The Trend of Economic Thinking.” Economica 40: 127 – 37.  Google Scholar
  13. Hayek, F. A. (Ed.) 1935. Collectivist Economic Planning: Critical Studies on the Possibilities of Socialism. London: George Routledge & Sons.  Google Scholar
  14. Hayek, F. A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4 (13): 33 – 54.  Google Scholar
  15. Hayek, F. A. 1939. Profits, Interest and Investment. And Other Essays on the Theory on Industrial Fluctuations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar
  16. Hayek, F. A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Hayek, F. A. 1994 [1956]. “Preface to the 1956 Paperback Edition.” Reprinted in The Road to Serfdom, 50th Anniversary Edition, xxvii–xliv. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  18. Hayek, F. A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  19. Irwin, D. 2020. “Adam Smith’s ‘Tolerable Administration of Justice’ and the Wealth of Nations.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 67 (3): 231 – 47.  Google Scholar
  20. Keynes, J. M. 1978 [1926]. “The End of Laissez-Faire.” In The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 9: Essays in Persuasion, edited by E. Johnson and D. Moggridge, 272 – 94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  21. Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  22. Kirzner, I. M. 1988. “The Economic Calculation Debate: Lessons for Austrians.” Review of Austrian Economics 2 (1): 1 – 18.  Google Scholar
  23. Kirzner, I. M. 2017. “The Entrepreneurial Market Process–An Exposition.” Southern Economic Journal 83 (4): 855 – 68.  Google Scholar
  24. Knight, F. H. 1933 [1921]. Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.  Google Scholar
  25. Knight, F. H. 1938. “Lippmann’s ‘The Good Society.’” Journal of Political Economy 46 (6): 864 – 72.  Google Scholar
  26. Laski, H. 1933. Democracy in Crisis. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Lewis, J. D. 1938. “‘An Inquiry into the Principles of the Good Society’ by Walter Lippmann.” American Political Science Review 32 (1): 127 – 8.  Google Scholar
  28. Lippmann, W. 2005 [1937]. The Good Society. New Brunswick: Transactions Publishers.  Google Scholar
  29. Machovec, F. M. 1995. Perfect Competition and the Transformation of Economics. New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  30. Merriam, C. E. 1938. “The Good Society.” Political Science Quarterly 53 (1): 129 – 34.  Google Scholar
  31. Mises, L. 1936 [1922]. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. London: Jonathan Cape.  Google Scholar
  32. Mises, L. 1944. Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War. New Haven: Yale University Press.  Google Scholar
  33. Robbins, L. 1932. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  34. Robbins, L. 1934. The Great Depression. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  35. Robbins, L. 1937. Economic Planning and International Order. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  36. Robbins, L. 1939. The Economic Causes of War. London: Jonathan Cape.  Google Scholar
  37. Robbins, L. 1952. The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  38. Simons, H. C. 1934. A Positive Program for Laissez Faire: Some Proposals for a Liberal Economic Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  39. Simons, H. C. 1936. “Rules versus Authorities in Monetary Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 44 (1): 1 – 30.  Google Scholar
  40. Simons, H. C. 1983. Simons’ Syllabus. Fairfax: Center for Study of Public Choice.  Google Scholar
  41. Soule, G. 1938. “‘The Good Society’ by Walter Lippmann.” Science and Society 2 (2): 260 – 2.  Google Scholar
  42. Stigler, G. J. 1957. “Perfect Competition, Historically Contemplated.” Journal of Political Economy 65 (1): 1 – 17.  Google Scholar
  43. Viner, J. 1931. “Cost Curves and Supply Curves.” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 3 (1): 23 – 46.  Google Scholar
  44. Viner, J. 2013. Lectures in Economics 301, edited by D. A. Erwin and S. G. Medema. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.  Google Scholar
  45. Wagner, R. E. 2010. Mind, Society and Human Action: Time and Knowledge in a Theory of Social Economy. New York: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  46. Wicksteed, P. H. 1933 [1910]. The Common Sense of Political Economy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.  Google Scholar

Abstract

What explains the simultaneous critiques of economic theory and liberalism during the 1930s? Early neoclassical economists had a common understanding of the proper institutional context undergirding a liberal market order. From the marginal revolution emerged a growing emphasis on analyzing markets as equilibrium states rather than processes. Because the institutions that frame a liberal market order were taken as given, to the point of relative neglect, this resulted in the notion that markets operated in an institutional vacuum. The resulting association of liberalism with laissez-faire, therefore, prompted a restatement of the role institutions play in the operation of a liberal market order.