Menu Expand
  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital
  4. Vol. 53, Issue 3
  5. pp. 383–419

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Miersch, E. Research Evaluation of Financial Research – Evidence from a Survey. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 53(3), 383-419. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.53.3.383
Miersch, Enrico "Research Evaluation of Financial Research – Evidence from a Survey" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 53.3, 2020, 383-419. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.53.3.383
Miersch, Enrico (2020): Research Evaluation of Financial Research – Evidence from a Survey, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 53, iss. 3, 383-419, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.53.3.383
Format
Download

Research Evaluation of Financial Research – Evidence from a Survey

Miersch, Enrico

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 53 (2020), Iss. 3 : pp. 383–419

Read Now Download (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.53.3.383
Language
English
Pages
37
Keywords

Author Details

Enrico Miersch, Master of Science, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Department of Financial Services, Licher Straße 74, 35394 Gießen, Germany

References

  1. Abramo, G./D’Angelo, C. A./Di Costa, F. (2010): Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable?, Scientometrics, Vol. 84(3), 821–833.  Google Scholar
  2. Acedo, F. J./Barroso, C./Casanueva, C./Galán, J. L. (2006): Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, 957–983.  Google Scholar
  3. Adams, J./Black, G./Clemmons, J./Stephan, P. (2005): Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, Research Policy, Vol. 34, 259–285.  Google Scholar
  4. American Finance Association – Program Chair Report (2007): Program Chair Report for the January 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Finance Association, American Finance Association: Chicago (USA).  Google Scholar
  5. Azar, O. H. (2007): The Slowdown in First-Response Times of Economics Journals: Can it be beneficial?, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 45(1), 179–187.  Google Scholar
  6. Barnett, A. H./Ault, R. W./Kaserman, D. L. (1988): The Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Economics: Further Evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70(3), 539.  Google Scholar
  7. Beattie, V./Goodacre, A. (2006): A new method for ranking academic journals in accounting and finance, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 36(2), 65–91.  Google Scholar
  8. Bell, S. T./Villado, A. J./Lukasik, M. A./Belau, L./Briggs, A. L. (2011): Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Management, Vol. 37(3), 709–743.  Google Scholar
  9. Benedetto, S./Cicero, T./Malgarini, M. (2016): Determinants of research quality in Italian universities: Evidence from the 2004 to 2010 evaluation exercise, Research Evaluation, Vol. 25(3), 257–263.  Google Scholar
  10. Besancenot, D./Huynh, K./Serranito, F. (2017): Co-authorship and research productivity in economics: Assessing the assortative matching hypothesis, Economic Modelling, Vol. 66, 61–80.  Google Scholar
  11. Bielinska-Kwapisz, A. (2012): Published, not perished, but has anybody read it? Citation success of finance research articles, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 22(20), 1679–1695.  Google Scholar
  12. Borokhovich, K. A./Bricker, R. J./Simkins, B. J. (2000): An analysis of finance journal impact factors, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 55(14), 57–1469.  Google Scholar
  13. Borokhovich, K. A./Lee, A.A./Simkins, B. J. (2011): A framework for journal assessment: The case of the Journal of Banking and Finance, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 35(1), 1–6.  Google Scholar
  14. Bosquet, C./Combes, P. (2013): Are academics who publish more also more cited? Individual determinants of publication and citation records, Scientometrics, Vol. 97, 831–857.  Google Scholar
  15. Brown, C. L./Chan, K. C./Lai, P. (2006): Marketing Journal Coauthorships: An Empirical Analysis of Coauthor Behavior, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 28(1), 17–25.  Google Scholar
  16. Brown, C. L./Chan, K. C./Chen, C. R. (2011): First-author conditions: Evidence from finance journal coauthorship, Applied Economics, Vol. 43(25), 3687–3697.  Google Scholar
  17. Brown, L. D. (2005): The Importance of Circulating and Presenting Manuscripts: Evidence from the Accounting Literature, The Accounting Review, Vol. 80(1), 55–83.  Google Scholar
  18. Card, D./Della-Vigna, S. (2013): Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 51(1), 144–161.  Google Scholar
  19. Chan, K. C./Chang, C. H./Chang, Y. (2013): Ranking of finance journals: Some Google Scholar citation perspectives, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 21, 241–250.  Google Scholar
  20. Chan, K. C./Chang, C. H./Lo, Y. L. (2009): A retrospective evaluation of European financial management (1995–2008), European Financial Management, Vol. 15, 676–691.  Google Scholar
  21. Chan, K. C./Chen, C. R./Steiner, T. L. (2002): Production in the finance literature, institutional reputation and labor mobility in academia: a global perspective, Financial Management, Vol. 31, 131–156.  Google Scholar
  22. Chan, K. C./Liano, K. (2009): A threshold citation analysis of influential articles, journals, institutions, and researchers in accounting, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 49, 59–74.  Google Scholar
  23. Chung, K. H./Cox, R. A. K./Kim, K. A. (2009): On the relation between intellectual collaboration and intellectual output: evidence from the financial academe, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 49, 893–916.  Google Scholar
  24. Coupé, T. (2013): Peer review versus citations – An analysis of best paper prizes, Research Policy, Vol. 42(1), 295–301.  Google Scholar
  25. Currie, R. R./Pandher, G. S. (2011): Finance journal rankings and tiers: An active scholar assessment methodology, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 35(1), 7–20.  Google Scholar
  26. Ductor, L. (2015): Does Co-authorship lead to higher academic productivity?, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77(3), 385–407.  Google Scholar
  27. Ellison, G. (2002): The slowdown of the economics publishing process, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, 947–993.  Google Scholar
  28. Fahn, M./Hakenes, H. (2019): Teamwork as a Self- Disciplining Device, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, Vol. 11(4), 1–32.  Google Scholar
  29. Franceschet, M./Costantini, A. (2010): The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4(4), 540–553.  Google Scholar
  30. Gans, J./Shepherd, G. (1994): How the mighty have fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8(1), 165–179.  Google Scholar
  31. Ghosh, P./Liu, Z. (2020): Coauthorship and the gender gap in top economics journal publications, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 27(7), 580–590.  Google Scholar
  32. Glänzel, W. (2002): Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies, Library Trends, Vol. 50, 461–473.  Google Scholar
  33. Gruenfeld, D. H./Mannix, E. A./Williams, K. Y./Neale, M. A. (1996): Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 67(1), 1–15.  Google Scholar
  34. Hamermesh, D. (2018): Citations In Economics: Measurement, Uses, and Impacts, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 56(1), 115–156.  Google Scholar
  35. Hamermesh, D./Schmidt, P. (2003): The Determinants of Econometric Society Fellows Elections, Econometrica, Vol. 71, 399–407.  Google Scholar
  36. Hardin, J. W./Hilbe, J. M. (2007): Generalized Linear Models and Extensions, Stata Press: Lakeway, Texas (USA).  Google Scholar
  37. Harzing, A. W. (2016): Journal Quality List (27th ed.), April 2016, available at www.harzing.com.  Google Scholar
  38. Hilbe, J. (2011): Negative Binomial Regression, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  39. Hinnant, C. C./Stvilia, B./Wu, S./Worrall, A./Burnett, G./Burnett, K./Kazmer, M. M./Marty, P. F. (2012): Author-team diversity and the impact of scientific publications: Evidence from physics research at a national science lab, Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 34(4), 249–257.  Google Scholar
  40. Holder, M. E./Langrehr, F. W./Schroeder, D. M. (2000): Finance Journal Coauthorship: How Do Coauthors in Very Select Journals Evaluate the Experience?, Financial Practice and Education, Spring/Summer, 142–152.  Google Scholar
  41. Hollis, A. (2001): Co-authorship and the output of academic economists, Labour Economics, Vol. 8, 503–530.  Google Scholar
  42. Hoegl, M./Gemuenden, H. G. (2001): Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence, Organization Science, Vol. 12(4), 435–449.  Google Scholar
  43. Horwitz, S. K./Horwitz, I. B. (2007): The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography, Journal of Management, Vol. 33(6), 987–1015.  Google Scholar
  44. Hudson, J. (1996): Trends in multi-authored papers in economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10, 153–158.  Google Scholar
  45. Jackson, S. E./Joshi, A./Erhardt, N. L. (2003): Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications, Journal of Management, Vol. 29(6), 801–830.  Google Scholar
  46. Keloharju, M. (2008): What’s new in finance?, European Financial Management, Vol. 14(3), 564–608.  Google Scholar
  47. Kerl, A./Miersch, E./Walter, A. (2018): Evaluation of academic finance conferences, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 89, 26–38.  Google Scholar
  48. Krapf, M. (2015): Age and complementarity in scientific collaboration, Empirical Economics, Vol. 49(2), 751–781.  Google Scholar
  49. Kumar, S./Ratnavelu, K. (2016): Perceptions of Scholars in the Field of Economics on Co-Authorship Associations: Evidence from an International Survey, PLOS ONE, Vol. 11(6): e0157633.  Google Scholar
  50. Laband, D. N. (1990): Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics: Preliminary Evidence from Authors, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, 341–353.  Google Scholar
  51. Laband, D. N. (2013): On the use and abuse of economics journal rankings, The Economic Journal, Vol. 123, 223–254.  Google Scholar
  52. Laband, D. N./Tollison, R. D. (2000): Intellectual collaboration, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 108(3), 632–662.  Google Scholar
  53. Laband, D. N./Tollison, R. D. (2003): Dry holes in economic research, Kyklos, Vol. 56(2), 161–173.  Google Scholar
  54. Lee, S./Bozeman, B. (2005): The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 35(5), 673–702.  Google Scholar
  55. Levitt, J. M. (2015): What is the optimal number of researchers for social science research?, Scientometrics, Vol. 102(1), 213–225.  Google Scholar
  56. Long, J. S. (1997): Regression Models for Categorial and Limited Dependent Variables, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, California (USA).  Google Scholar
  57. Mannix, E./Neale, M. A. (2005): What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations, Psychological science in the public interest, Vol. 6(2), 31–55.  Google Scholar
  58. Manton, E. J./English, D. E. (2007): The trend towards multiple authorship in business journals, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 82, 164–168.  Google Scholar
  59. McDowell, J. M./Melvin, M. (1983): The Determinants of Co-Authorship: An Analysis of the Economics Literature, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65(1), 155–160.  Google Scholar
  60. Medoff, M. H. (2003): Collaboration and the quality of economic research, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 19, 597–608.  Google Scholar
  61. Milliken, F. J./Martins, L. L. (1996): Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21(2), 402–433.  Google Scholar
  62. Moore, W. J./Newman, R. J./Turnbull, G. K. (2001): Reputational Capital and Academic Pay, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 39(4), 663–671.  Google Scholar
  63. Moosa, I. (2011): The demise of the ARC journal ranking scheme: an ex post analysis of the accounting and finance journals, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 51, 809–836.  Google Scholar
  64. Oltheten, E./Theoharakis, V./Travlos, N. G. (2005): Faculty perceptions and readership patterns of finance journals: A global view, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 40(1), 223–239.  Google Scholar
  65. Pons-Novell, J./Tirado-Fabregat, D. A. (2010): Is there life beyond the ISI journal lists? The international impact of Spanish, Italian, French and German economics journals, Applied Economics, Vol. 42(6), 689–699.  Google Scholar
  66. Reinartz, S. J./Urban, D. (2017): Finance conference quality and publication success: A conference ranking, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 42, 155–174.  Google Scholar
  67. Saá-Pérez, P./Díaz-Díaz, N. L./Aguiar-Díaz, I./Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J. L. (2017): How diversity contributes to academic research teams performance, R&D Management, Vol. 47(2), 165–179.  Google Scholar
  68. Schinski, M./Kugler, A./Wick, W. (1998): Perceptions of the Academic Finance Profession Regarding Publishing and the Allocation of Credit in Coauthorship Situations, Financial Practice & Education, Vol. 8(1), 60–68.  Google Scholar
  69. Stvilia, B./Hinnant, C. C./Schindler, K./Worrall, A./Burnett, G./Burnett, K./Kazmer, M. M./Marty, P. F. (2011): Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 62(2), 270–283.  Google Scholar
  70. Tompkins, J. G./Nathan, S./Hermanson, R. H./Hermanson, D. R. (1997): Coauthoring in Refereed Journals: Perceptions of Finance Faculty and Department Chairs, Financial Practice & Education, Vol. 7(2), 47–57.  Google Scholar
  71. van Dijk, H./van Engen, M. L./van Knippenberg, D. (2012): Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 119(1), 38–53.  Google Scholar
  72. van Knippenberg, D./Schippers, M. C. (2007): Work group diversity. Annual review of psychology, Vol. 58, 515–541.  Google Scholar
  73. Walter, A. (2011): The effects of coauthorship on the quality of financial research papers, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 81(2), 205–234.  Google Scholar
  74. Webber, S. S./Donahue, L. M. (2001): Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis, Journal of Management, Vol. 27(2), 141–162.  Google Scholar
  75. Wuchty, S./Jones, B. F./Uzzi, B. (2007): The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, Science, Vol. 316(5827), 1036–1039.  Google Scholar
  76. Abramo, G./D’Angelo, C. A./Di Costa, F. (2010): Citations versus journal impact factor as proxy of quality: Could the latter ever be preferable?, Scientometrics, Vol. 84(3), 821–833.  Google Scholar
  77. Acedo, F. J./Barroso, C./Casanueva, C./Galán, J. L. (2006): Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, 957–983.  Google Scholar
  78. Adams, J./Black, G./Clemmons, J./Stephan, P. (2005): Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U.S. universities, Research Policy, Vol. 34, 259–285.  Google Scholar
  79. American Finance Association – Program Chair Report (2007): Program Chair Report for the January 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Finance Association, American Finance Association: Chicago (USA).  Google Scholar
  80. Azar, O. H. (2007): The Slowdown in First-Response Times of Economics Journals: Can it be beneficial?, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 45(1), 179–187.  Google Scholar
  81. Barnett, A. H./Ault, R. W./Kaserman, D. L. (1988): The Rising Incidence of Co-authorship in Economics: Further Evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70(3), 539.  Google Scholar
  82. Beattie, V./Goodacre, A. (2006): A new method for ranking academic journals in accounting and finance, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 36(2), 65–91.  Google Scholar
  83. Bell, S. T./Villado, A. J./Lukasik, M. A./Belau, L./Briggs, A. L. (2011): Getting Specific about Demographic Diversity Variable and Team Performance Relationships: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Management, Vol. 37(3), 709–743.  Google Scholar
  84. Benedetto, S./Cicero, T./Malgarini, M. (2016): Determinants of research quality in Italian universities: Evidence from the 2004 to 2010 evaluation exercise, Research Evaluation, Vol. 25(3), 257–263.  Google Scholar
  85. Besancenot, D./Huynh, K./Serranito, F. (2017): Co-authorship and research productivity in economics: Assessing the assortative matching hypothesis, Economic Modelling, Vol. 66, 61–80.  Google Scholar
  86. Bielinska-Kwapisz, A. (2012): Published, not perished, but has anybody read it? Citation success of finance research articles, Applied Financial Economics, Vol. 22(20), 1679–1695.  Google Scholar
  87. Borokhovich, K. A./Bricker, R. J./Simkins, B. J. (2000): An analysis of finance journal impact factors, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 55(14), 57–1469.  Google Scholar
  88. Borokhovich, K. A./Lee, A.A./Simkins, B. J. (2011): A framework for journal assessment: The case of the Journal of Banking and Finance, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 35(1), 1–6.  Google Scholar
  89. Bosquet, C./Combes, P. (2013): Are academics who publish more also more cited? Individual determinants of publication and citation records, Scientometrics, Vol. 97, 831–857.  Google Scholar
  90. Brown, C. L./Chan, K. C./Lai, P. (2006): Marketing Journal Coauthorships: An Empirical Analysis of Coauthor Behavior, Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 28(1), 17–25.  Google Scholar
  91. Brown, C. L./Chan, K. C./Chen, C. R. (2011): First-author conditions: Evidence from finance journal coauthorship, Applied Economics, Vol. 43(25), 3687–3697.  Google Scholar
  92. Brown, L. D. (2005): The Importance of Circulating and Presenting Manuscripts: Evidence from the Accounting Literature, The Accounting Review, Vol. 80(1), 55–83.  Google Scholar
  93. Card, D./Della-Vigna, S. (2013): Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 51(1), 144–161.  Google Scholar
  94. Chan, K. C./Chang, C. H./Chang, Y. (2013): Ranking of finance journals: Some Google Scholar citation perspectives, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 21, 241–250.  Google Scholar
  95. Chan, K. C./Chang, C. H./Lo, Y. L. (2009): A retrospective evaluation of European financial management (1995–2008), European Financial Management, Vol. 15, 676–691.  Google Scholar
  96. Chan, K. C./Chen, C. R./Steiner, T. L. (2002): Production in the finance literature, institutional reputation and labor mobility in academia: a global perspective, Financial Management, Vol. 31, 131–156.  Google Scholar
  97. Chan, K. C./Liano, K. (2009): A threshold citation analysis of influential articles, journals, institutions, and researchers in accounting, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 49, 59–74.  Google Scholar
  98. Chung, K. H./Cox, R. A. K./Kim, K. A. (2009): On the relation between intellectual collaboration and intellectual output: evidence from the financial academe, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 49, 893–916.  Google Scholar
  99. Coupé, T. (2013): Peer review versus citations – An analysis of best paper prizes, Research Policy, Vol. 42(1), 295–301.  Google Scholar
  100. Currie, R. R./Pandher, G. S. (2011): Finance journal rankings and tiers: An active scholar assessment methodology, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 35(1), 7–20.  Google Scholar
  101. Ductor, L. (2015): Does Co-authorship lead to higher academic productivity?, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 77(3), 385–407.  Google Scholar
  102. Ellison, G. (2002): The slowdown of the economics publishing process, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 105, 947–993.  Google Scholar
  103. Fahn, M./Hakenes, H. (2019): Teamwork as a Self- Disciplining Device, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, Vol. 11(4), 1–32.  Google Scholar
  104. Franceschet, M./Costantini, A. (2010): The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers, Journal of Informetrics, Vol. 4(4), 540–553.  Google Scholar
  105. Gans, J./Shepherd, G. (1994): How the mighty have fallen: rejected classic articles by leading economists, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8(1), 165–179.  Google Scholar
  106. Ghosh, P./Liu, Z. (2020): Coauthorship and the gender gap in top economics journal publications, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 27(7), 580–590.  Google Scholar
  107. Glänzel, W. (2002): Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): a bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies, Library Trends, Vol. 50, 461–473.  Google Scholar
  108. Gruenfeld, D. H./Mannix, E. A./Williams, K. Y./Neale, M. A. (1996): Group Composition and Decision Making: How Member Familiarity and Information Distribution Affect Process and Performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 67(1), 1–15.  Google Scholar
  109. Hamermesh, D. (2018): Citations In Economics: Measurement, Uses, and Impacts, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 56(1), 115–156.  Google Scholar
  110. Hamermesh, D./Schmidt, P. (2003): The Determinants of Econometric Society Fellows Elections, Econometrica, Vol. 71, 399–407.  Google Scholar
  111. Hardin, J. W./Hilbe, J. M. (2007): Generalized Linear Models and Extensions, Stata Press: Lakeway, Texas (USA).  Google Scholar
  112. Harzing, A. W. (2016): Journal Quality List (27th ed.), April 2016, available at www.harzing.com.  Google Scholar
  113. Hilbe, J. (2011): Negative Binomial Regression, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  114. Hinnant, C. C./Stvilia, B./Wu, S./Worrall, A./Burnett, G./Burnett, K./Kazmer, M. M./Marty, P. F. (2012): Author-team diversity and the impact of scientific publications: Evidence from physics research at a national science lab, Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 34(4), 249–257.  Google Scholar
  115. Holder, M. E./Langrehr, F. W./Schroeder, D. M. (2000): Finance Journal Coauthorship: How Do Coauthors in Very Select Journals Evaluate the Experience?, Financial Practice and Education, Spring/Summer, 142–152.  Google Scholar
  116. Hollis, A. (2001): Co-authorship and the output of academic economists, Labour Economics, Vol. 8, 503–530.  Google Scholar
  117. Hoegl, M./Gemuenden, H. G. (2001): Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence, Organization Science, Vol. 12(4), 435–449.  Google Scholar
  118. Horwitz, S. K./Horwitz, I. B. (2007): The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team Demography, Journal of Management, Vol. 33(6), 987–1015.  Google Scholar
  119. Hudson, J. (1996): Trends in multi-authored papers in economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 10, 153–158.  Google Scholar
  120. Jackson, S. E./Joshi, A./Erhardt, N. L. (2003): Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications, Journal of Management, Vol. 29(6), 801–830.  Google Scholar
  121. Keloharju, M. (2008): What’s new in finance?, European Financial Management, Vol. 14(3), 564–608.  Google Scholar
  122. Kerl, A./Miersch, E./Walter, A. (2018): Evaluation of academic finance conferences, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 89, 26–38.  Google Scholar
  123. Krapf, M. (2015): Age and complementarity in scientific collaboration, Empirical Economics, Vol. 49(2), 751–781.  Google Scholar
  124. Kumar, S./Ratnavelu, K. (2016): Perceptions of Scholars in the Field of Economics on Co-Authorship Associations: Evidence from an International Survey, PLOS ONE, Vol. 11(6): e0157633.  Google Scholar
  125. Laband, D. N. (1990): Is There Value-Added from the Review Process in Economics: Preliminary Evidence from Authors, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 105, 341–353.  Google Scholar
  126. Laband, D. N. (2013): On the use and abuse of economics journal rankings, The Economic Journal, Vol. 123, 223–254.  Google Scholar
  127. Laband, D. N./Tollison, R. D. (2000): Intellectual collaboration, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 108(3), 632–662.  Google Scholar
  128. Laband, D. N./Tollison, R. D. (2003): Dry holes in economic research, Kyklos, Vol. 56(2), 161–173.  Google Scholar
  129. Lee, S./Bozeman, B. (2005): The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 35(5), 673–702.  Google Scholar
  130. Levitt, J. M. (2015): What is the optimal number of researchers for social science research?, Scientometrics, Vol. 102(1), 213–225.  Google Scholar
  131. Long, J. S. (1997): Regression Models for Categorial and Limited Dependent Variables, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, California (USA).  Google Scholar
  132. Mannix, E./Neale, M. A. (2005): What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations, Psychological science in the public interest, Vol. 6(2), 31–55.  Google Scholar
  133. Manton, E. J./English, D. E. (2007): The trend towards multiple authorship in business journals, Journal of Education for Business, Vol. 82, 164–168.  Google Scholar
  134. McDowell, J. M./Melvin, M. (1983): The Determinants of Co-Authorship: An Analysis of the Economics Literature, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 65(1), 155–160.  Google Scholar
  135. Medoff, M. H. (2003): Collaboration and the quality of economic research, Journal of Labor Economics, Vol. 19, 597–608.  Google Scholar
  136. Milliken, F. J./Martins, L. L. (1996): Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21(2), 402–433.  Google Scholar
  137. Moore, W. J./Newman, R. J./Turnbull, G. K. (2001): Reputational Capital and Academic Pay, Economic Inquiry, Vol. 39(4), 663–671.  Google Scholar
  138. Moosa, I. (2011): The demise of the ARC journal ranking scheme: an ex post analysis of the accounting and finance journals, Accounting and Finance, Vol. 51, 809–836.  Google Scholar
  139. Oltheten, E./Theoharakis, V./Travlos, N. G. (2005): Faculty perceptions and readership patterns of finance journals: A global view, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 40(1), 223–239.  Google Scholar
  140. Pons-Novell, J./Tirado-Fabregat, D. A. (2010): Is there life beyond the ISI journal lists? The international impact of Spanish, Italian, French and German economics journals, Applied Economics, Vol. 42(6), 689–699.  Google Scholar
  141. Reinartz, S. J./Urban, D. (2017): Finance conference quality and publication success: A conference ranking, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 42, 155–174.  Google Scholar
  142. Saá-Pérez, P./Díaz-Díaz, N. L./Aguiar-Díaz, I./Ballesteros-Rodríguez, J. L. (2017): How diversity contributes to academic research teams performance, R&D Management, Vol. 47(2), 165–179.  Google Scholar
  143. Schinski, M./Kugler, A./Wick, W. (1998): Perceptions of the Academic Finance Profession Regarding Publishing and the Allocation of Credit in Coauthorship Situations, Financial Practice & Education, Vol. 8(1), 60–68.  Google Scholar
  144. Stvilia, B./Hinnant, C. C./Schindler, K./Worrall, A./Burnett, G./Burnett, K./Kazmer, M. M./Marty, P. F. (2011): Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 62(2), 270–283.  Google Scholar
  145. Tompkins, J. G./Nathan, S./Hermanson, R. H./Hermanson, D. R. (1997): Coauthoring in Refereed Journals: Perceptions of Finance Faculty and Department Chairs, Financial Practice & Education, Vol. 7(2), 47–57.  Google Scholar
  146. van Dijk, H./van Engen, M. L./van Knippenberg, D. (2012): Defying conventional wisdom: A meta-analytical examination of the differences between demographic and job-related diversity relationships with performance, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 119(1), 38–53.  Google Scholar
  147. van Knippenberg, D./Schippers, M. C. (2007): Work group diversity. Annual review of psychology, Vol. 58, 515–541.  Google Scholar
  148. Walter, A. (2011): The effects of coauthorship on the quality of financial research papers, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 81(2), 205–234.  Google Scholar
  149. Webber, S. S./Donahue, L. M. (2001): Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis, Journal of Management, Vol. 27(2), 141–162.  Google Scholar
  150. Wuchty, S./Jones, B. F./Uzzi, B. (2007): The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge, Science, Vol. 316(5827), 1036–1039.  Google Scholar

Abstract

I explore the role of team collaboration in financial research based on a survey of conference participants. Precisely, I investigate whether various team and project characteristics are associated with research quality. The use of different quality proxies, i.?e., normalized total citations, Journal Impact Factor, and publication success in top 10 finance journals, and the origin of the data allow me to not only analyse working papers spread throughout the entire quality spectrum but also to research new variables, e.?g., team work quality and communication intensity. I document a positive relation between research quality and the following project characteristics: authors’ scholarly capability, working paper’s presentation at top tier conferences and research seminar series.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Enrico Miersch: Research Evaluation of Financial Research – Evidence from a Survey 1
Abstract 1
I. Introduction 1
II. Research Quality and Characteristics Potentially Correlated with Research Quality 4
1. Assessment of Research Quality 4
2. Team and Project Characteristics Potentially Related with Research Quality 6
a) Co-Authorship 6
b) Team Diversity Characteristics 7
c) Other Project Characteristics 8
III. Survey of Conference Participants 9
1. Data and Data Collection Process 9
2. Descriptive Statistics of Survey Participants 1
3. Testing for Selective Response 1
IV. Methodology and Descriptive Statistics 1
1. Methodological Approach to Analyse the Relation Between Research Quality and Various Team and Project Characteristics 1
2. Econometric Model 1
3. Descriptive Statistics 2
V. Empirical Analysis 2
1. Results Based on Normalized Citations 2
2. Modified Analysis Based on Normalized Citations per Author 2
3. Further Analyses 2
4. Discussion of Empirical Analyses 3
VI. Conclusion 3
References 3

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.