Menu Expand

Against the Hybrid Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Punishment

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Pickering, M. Against the Hybrid Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Punishment. Jahrbuch Recht und Ethik, 28(1), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.3790/jre.28.1.115
Pickering, Mark "Against the Hybrid Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Punishment" Jahrbuch Recht und Ethik 28.1, 2020, 115-134. https://doi.org/10.3790/jre.28.1.115
Pickering, Mark (2020): Against the Hybrid Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Punishment, in: Jahrbuch Recht und Ethik, vol. 28, iss. 1, 115-134, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/jre.28.1.115

Format

Against the Hybrid Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Punishment

Pickering, Mark

Jahrbuch Recht und Ethik, Vol. 28(2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 115–134

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Pickering, Mark, JD, PhD, Instructor, Department of Philosophy, The University of Alabama, Box 870218, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA

Cited By

  1. Followability, Necessity, and Excuse: Interpreting Kant’s Penal Theory

    Campbell, Robert

    Kantian Review, Vol. 29(2024), Iss. 2 P.169

    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415424000062 [Citations: 0]

Abstract

In Kant's work metaphysics of the customs, metaphysical initial reasons of legal apprenticeship, it seems to be the case that he relates to criminal law both retributivist and consequential positions. In recent decades, some researchers have pleaded for Kant's theory of criminal law to be a hybrid of consequentialism and retributivism. B. Sharon Byrd's interpretation is the most influential version of this view. In contrast, I argue that the textual evidence of the consequentialist side of a hybrid interpretation is only weak and that evidence is not available for a retributivist side of a hybrid interpretation. There are even passages that contradict this interpretation. I conclude that the hybrid interpretation should be abandoned.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Mark Pickering: Against the Hybrid Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Punishment 115
I. Kant’s apparently contradictory statements on punishment 115
II. Apparently Consequentialist Passages in the Doctrine of Right 117
1. The purpose of the state and its laws 117
2. The right of necessity 118
3. Application of the law of retaliation 121
4. Conclusion 122
III. Reflexionen and the Lecture Notes of Kant’s Students 122
1. Kant’s Reflexionen 122
2. Student lecture notes 115
3. Summary 115
IV. Kant’s Hypothetical Scenarios in the Doctrine of Right 115
1. The last murderer 115
2. Too many murderers 115
3. Killings motivated by honor 115
4. Summary of the textual evidence that contradicts the hybrid interpretation 115
V. The Retributivist Side of the Hybrid Interpretation 115
VI. Conclusion 115
Zusammenfassung 115