JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Against the Hybrid Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Punishment
Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik / Annual Review of Law and Ethics, Vol. 28 (2020), Iss. 1 : pp. 115–134
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
Pickering, Mark, JD, PhD, Instructor, Department of Philosophy, The University of Alabama, Box 870218, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA
Abstract
In Kants Werk
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Pickering: Against the Hybrid Interpretation of Kant’s Theory of Punishment | 115 | ||
| I. Kant’s apparently contradictory statements on punishment | 115 | ||
| II. Apparently Consequentialist Passages in the Doctrine of Right | 117 | ||
| 1. The purpose of the state and its laws | 117 | ||
| 2. The right of necessity | 118 | ||
| 3. Application of the law of retaliation | 121 | ||
| 4. Conclusion | 122 | ||
| III. Reflexionen and the Lecture Notes of Kant’s Students | 122 | ||
| 1. Kant’s Reflexionen | 122 | ||
| 2. Student lecture notes | 115 | ||
| 3. Summary | 115 | ||
| IV. Kant’s Hypothetical Scenarios in the Doctrine of Right | 115 | ||
| 1. The last murderer | 115 | ||
| 2. Too many murderers | 115 | ||
| 3. Killings motivated by honor | 115 | ||
| 4. Summary of the textual evidence that contradicts the hybrid interpretation | 115 | ||
| V. The Retributivist Side of the Hybrid Interpretation | 115 | ||
| VI. Conclusion | 115 | ||
| Zusammenfassung | 115 |