Menu Expand

Differential Employment Prospects among Atypical Employees: Effects of Type of Contract or Worker Preference?

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Brülle, J. Differential Employment Prospects among Atypical Employees: Effects of Type of Contract or Worker Preference?. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 133(2), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.133.2.157
Brülle, Jan "Differential Employment Prospects among Atypical Employees: Effects of Type of Contract or Worker Preference?" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 133.2, 2013, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.133.2.157
Brülle, Jan (2013): Differential Employment Prospects among Atypical Employees: Effects of Type of Contract or Worker Preference?, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 133, iss. 2, 157-167, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.133.2.157

Format

Differential Employment Prospects among Atypical Employees: Effects of Type of Contract or Worker Preference?

Brülle, Jan

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 133 (2013), Iss. 2 : pp. 157–167

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Jan Brülle, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Grüneburgplatz 1 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Cited By

  1. What if it is not just an additional income? Poverty risks of non‐standard employment histories in Germany

    Wolf, Fridolin

    (2024)

    https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12676 [Citations: 0]

Abstract

In this study we analyze transitions from atypical to regular employment in Germany, focusing on the effects of different types of atypical employment on the transition probability into full-time and long-term employment. The predictions are tested using discrete-time duration models with random effects. The empirical results confirm the importance of the type of work contract. Fixed-term employment shows the highest transition probabilities into regular employment, compared with agency work and regular part-time employment, while marginal employment yields the lowest chances of upward mobility. These effects can neither be explained by differences in the observed characteristics nor by the preferences for shorter working-hours by part-time employees.