Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Lloydd, M (2018). Persistent Tensions? International Legal Perspectives on ‘Other’ Foreign Fighters. German Yearbook of International Law, 60(1), 539-573. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.60.1.539
Lloydd, Marnie (2018). "Persistent Tensions? International Legal Perspectives on ‘Other’ Foreign Fighters" German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 60no. 1, 2018 pp. 539-573. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.60.1.539
Lloydd, M (2018). Persistent Tensions? International Legal Perspectives on ‘Other’ Foreign Fighters. German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 60 (Issue 1), pp 539-573. https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.60.1.539

Format

Persistent Tensions? International Legal Perspectives on ‘Other’ Foreign Fighters

Lloydd, Marnie

German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 60 (2018), Iss. 1 : pp. 539–573

1 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

Marnie Lloydd, PhD Candidate and Teaching Fellow, Melbourne Law School, Laureate Program in International Law.

Cited By

  1. Human Dignity and Human Security in Times of Terrorism

    Framing Foreign Fighting: Exploring the Scope of Prevention and the Categorisation of Fighters in International Law

    Lloydd, Marnie

    2020

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-355-9_10 [Citations: 0]

Abstract

This paper takes as its starting point the question of whether and to what extent States may have an international legal obligation towards other States to seek to prevent those within their jurisdiction from travelling abroad to fight with a non-State armed group in a foreign armed conflict. While there is a strong basis for such due diligence obligations regarding the prevention of terrorist activity, including Security Council Resolution 2178 (2014) on ‘foreign terrorist fighters’, the scope of responsibility is less clear regarding broader categories of foreigners participating in civil war, despite a long history of foreign volunteers in armed conflict. In this paper, I present a reading of two possible resolutions in international law to the question posed by this ‘other’ foreign fighting and explore the tensions between them. The first is based on State responsibility, sovereign equality, and diligent prevention of harm; the second on a more contextual reading of human rights considerations and global justice. The tensions surrounding ‘other’ foreign fighters provide a practical example of the oscillation between a reliance on the consent of States and a notion of the collective good in international legal argument. Acknowledging the practical reliance of States on these interlacing perspectives in different times and contexts, I suggest the importance of stepping back and slowing down to look beyond today’s predominant but narrower and rushed, focus on counter-terrorism approaches to take account of the key themes that have shaped the legal discourse and practice regarding a broader historical range of foreign volunteering in armed conflict.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Marnie Lloydd: Persistent Tensions? International Legal Perspectives on ‘Other’ Foreign Fighters 1
I. Introduction: The Dilemma Posed by Other Foreign Fighters 2
II. State Responsibility and Diligent Prevention of Harm 7
A. Primary Legal Duties Regarding Other Foreign Fighters 1
B. Flexibility within Due Diligence 1
III. Protection and Global Justice 1
A. R2P and Solidarity with Local Resistance? 1
B. The ‘Common Good’ Standing for Something 2
IV. Concluding Reflections: The Relevance of Stepping Back 2
A. Persistent Tensions in International Legal Argument 2
B. Practical Dilemmas in Policymaking 3