Artificial Agents and General Principles of Law
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Artificial Agents and General Principles of Law
German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 60 (2018), Iss. 1 : pp. 239–266
1 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
Antje von Ungern-Sternberg, Professor of Public Law, Comparative Law, Law and Religion, and Public International Law at the University of Trier.
Cited By
-
The Democratic Inclusion of Artificial Intelligence? Exploring the Patiency, Agency and Relational Conditions for Demos Membership
Beckman, Ludvig
Rosenberg, Jonas Hultin
Philosophy & Technology, Vol. 35 (2022), Iss. 2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00525-3 [Citations: 1]
Abstract
Artificial agents – from autonomous cars and weapon systems to social bots, from profiling and tracking programmes to risk assessment software predicting criminal recidivism or voting behaviour – challenge general principles of national and international law. This article addresses three of these principles: responsibility, explainability, and autonomy. Responsibility requires that actors be held accountable for their actions, including damages and breaches of law. Responsibility for actions and decisions taken by artificial agents can be secured by resorting to strict or objective liability schemes, which do not require human fault and other human factors, or by relocating human fault, i.e. by holding programmers, supervisors, or standard setters accountable. ‘Explainability’ is a term used to characterise that even if artificial agents produce useful and reliable results, it must be explainable how these results are generated. Lawyers have to define those areas of law that require an explanation for artificial agents’ activities, ranging from human rights interferences to, possibly, any form of automated decision-making that affects an individual. Finally, the many uses of artificial agents also raise questions regarding several aspects of autonomy, including privacy and data protection, individuality, and freedom from manipulation. Yet, artificial agents do not only challenge existing principles of law, they can also strengthen responsibility, explainability, and autonomy.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antje von Ungern-Sternberg: Artificial Agents and General Principles of Law | 1 | ||
| I. Introduction | 1 | ||
| II. Technology | 5 | ||
| III. Responsibility | 7 | ||
| A. Responsibility Without Human Fault | 9 | ||
| B. Relocating Human Fault | 1 | ||
| IV. Explainability | 1 | ||
| A. Human Rights | 1 | ||
| B. Other Sources of a Duty to Explain | 1 | ||
| V. Autonomy | 2 | ||
| A. Privacy and Data Protection | 2 | ||
| B. Individuality | 2 | ||
| C. Manipulation | 2 | ||
| VI. Conclusion | 2 |