International Law and Artificial Intelligence
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
International Law and Artificial Intelligence
German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 60 (2018), Iss. 1 : pp. 91–108
11 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
Thomas Burri, Prof. Dr., Assistant Professor of international law and European law at the University of St. Gallen (HSG) in Switzerland; Dr. iur. (Zurich), LL.M. (College of Europe, Bruges), lic.iur. (Basel), admitted to the bar of the canton of Zurich, V
Cited By
-
Mentoring Comparative Lawyers: Methods, Times, and Places
The Potential of Comparative Law
Fiorentini, Francesca | Infantino, Marta2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34754-3_14 [Citations: 1] -
Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and International Human Rights Law
Roumate, Fatima
The International Review of Information Ethics, Vol. 29 (2021), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.29173/irie422 [Citations: 9] -
Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities
Rodrigues, Rowena
Journal of Responsible Technology, Vol. 4 (2020), Iss. P.100005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100005 [Citations: 143] -
ULUSLARARASI YAKLAŞIMLA YAPAY ZEKÂ VE YAPAY ZEKÂ MARİFETİYLE DELİLLERE ERİŞİM
Kaya, İslam Safa | Karabay, HuzeyfeKırıkkale Hukuk Mecmuası, Vol. (2024), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.59909/khm.1424937 [Citations: 0] -
AI Governance in a Complex and Rapidly Changing Regulatory Landscape: A Global Perspective
Zaidan, Esmat | Ibrahim, Imad AntoineHumanities and Social Sciences Communications, Vol. 11 (2024), Iss. 1
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03560-x [Citations: 0] -
Research of artificial intelligence as a subject of crime
Begishev, Ildar | Asli, Mehrdad Rayejian | Denisovich, Veronika | Majorov, Andrey | Sergeyev, Andrey | Abdullayev, I. | Kukhar, V. | Akhmetshin, E. | Bekjanov, D. | Carballo-Penela, A.E3S Web of Conferences, Vol. 449 (2023), Iss. P.03004
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344903004 [Citations: 0] -
Aligning AI Regulation to Sociotechnical Change
Maas, Matthijs M.
SSRN Electronic Journal , Vol. (2021), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871635 [Citations: 1] -
International AI Institutions: A Literature Review of Models, Examples, and Proposals
Maas, Matthijs M. | Villalobos Ruiz, José JaimeSSRN Electronic Journal, Vol. (2023), Iss.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4579773 [Citations: 3] -
Artificial Intelligence - Latest Advances, New Paradigms and Novel Applications
The Prospects for Creating Instruments for the Coordination of Activities of International Organizations in the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence
Petrovna Talimonchik, Valentina
2021
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95437 [Citations: 0] -
Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy
Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence, New Challenges for Diplomacy and International Psychological Security
Roumate, Fatima
2021
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68647-5_8 [Citations: 4] -
Yapay Zekâ ve Uluslararası Hukukun Geleceği
DOST, Süleyman
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 13 (2023), Iss. 2 P.1271
https://doi.org/10.52273/sduhfd..1375673 [Citations: 1]
Abstract
This article proposes five arguments about major aspects of artificial intelligence and their implications for international law. The aspects are: automation, personhood, weapons systems, control, and standardisation. The arguments in aggregate convey an idea of where international law needs to be adapted in order to cope with the artificial intelligence revolution under way. The arguments also show the inspiration that may be drawn from existing international law for the governance of artificial intelligence.
Table of Contents
| Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Burri: International Law and Artificial Intelligence | 1 | ||
| I. Introduction | 1 | ||
| II. Argument 1: International Law Will Not Be Automated | 2 | ||
| III. Argument 2: As Artificially Intelligent Entities with Legal Personality Emerge, the Law Must Be Reviewed | 5 | ||
| IV. Argument 3: The Geneva Process Will Result in a Ban on Autonomous Weapons Systems, But It Will Be Limited to Weapons Systems Operating Beyond Meaningful Human Control | 8 | ||
| V. Argument 4: Existing International Law Offers Valuable Insights into the Meaning of Control Over Artificial Intelligence and the Limits of Delegation | 1 | ||
| VI. Argument 5: Supersoft Law Will Govern Artificial Intelligence | 1 | ||
| VII. Conclusion | 1 |