Menu Expand

Hybride multilokale Arbeit: „New Work“ Potenziale im Remote-, Co-working- und KMU-Office

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship
  4. Vol. 69, Issue 1
  5. pp. 1–16

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Bouncken, R., Gantert, T. Hybride multilokale Arbeit: „New Work“ Potenziale im Remote-, Co-working- und KMU-Office. ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 69(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.1.1
Bouncken, Ricarda B. and Gantert, Till Marius "Hybride multilokale Arbeit: „New Work“ Potenziale im Remote-, Co-working- und KMU-Office" ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship 69.1, 2021, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.1.1
Bouncken, Ricarda B./Gantert, Till Marius (2021): Hybride multilokale Arbeit: „New Work“ Potenziale im Remote-, Co-working- und KMU-Office, in: ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, vol. 69, iss. 1, 1-16, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.1.1
Format
Download

Hybride multilokale Arbeit: „New Work“ Potenziale im Remote-, Co-working- und KMU-Office

Bouncken, Ricarda B. | Gantert, Till Marius

ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, Vol. 69 (2021), Iss. 1 : pp. 1–16

5 Citations (CrossRef)

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/zfke.69.1.1
Language
German
Pages
16

Pricing

Individual
€ 26.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ricarda B. Bouncken, Universität Bayreuth, Lehrstuhl für Strategisches Management und Organisation, Prieserstraße 2, 95444 Bayreuth, Deutschland

Till Marius Gantert, M. Sc., Universität Bayreuth, Lehrstuhl für Strategisches Management und Organisation, Prieserstraße 2, 95444 Bayreuth, Deutschland

Cited By

  1. Healthy, healthier, hybrid work: the burnout-reducing potential of remote work and the mediating effect of work autonomy

    Höcker, Martin Christian | Bachtal, Yassien | Voll, Kyra | Pfnür, Andreas

    International Journal of Workplace Health Management, Vol. 17 (2024), Iss. 4 P.319

    https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-02-2024-0036 [Citations: 1]

  2. New work design for knowledge creation and sustainability: An empirical study of coworking-spaces

    Bouncken, Ricarda B. | Aslam, Muhammad Mahmood | Gantert, Till Marius | Kallmuenzer, Andreas

    Journal of Business Research, Vol. 154 (2023), Iss. P.113337

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113337 [Citations: 20]

  3. Awakening the Management of Coworking Spaces

    Concluding Remarks

    Bouncken, Ricarda B.

    2023

    https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-029-820231011 [Citations: 0]

  4. Organizational sustainability identity: ‘New Work’ of home offices and coworking spaces as facilitators

    Bouncken, Ricarda B. | Lapidus, Artur | Qui, Yixin

    Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, Vol. 1 (2022), Iss. 2 P.100011

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2022.100011 [Citations: 31]

  5. Awakening the Management of Coworking Spaces

    How to Create Sense of Community in Coworking-Spaces

    Bouncken, Ricarda B. | Gantert, Till Marius

    2023

    https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-029-820231007 [Citations: 0]

References

  1. Allen, D. (2015): Getting things done: The art of stress-free productivity: Penguin.  Google Scholar
  2. Baruch, Y. (2000): Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New technology, work and employment, 34–49.  Google Scholar
  3. Bentley, T., Teo, S., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R. und Gloet, M. (2016): The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 207–215.  Google Scholar
  4. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J. und Ying, Z. J. (2015): Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 165–218.  Google Scholar
  5. Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M. und Qiu, Y. (2021): Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 119–130.  Google Scholar
  6. Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M. und Reuschl, A. J. (2018): The dark side of entrepreneurship in coworking-spaces, in: Porcar, A. T. und Soriano, D. R. (Hrsg.): Inside the mind of the entrepreneur, 1. Aufl., Springer, 135–147.  Google Scholar
  7. Bouncken, R. B. und Barwinski, R. (2020): Shared digital identity and rich knowledge ties in global 3D printing – a drizzle in the clouds? Global Strategy Journal, 81–108.  Google Scholar
  8. Bouncken, R. B., Kraus, S. und Martínez-Pérez, J. F. (2020b): Entrepreneurship of an institutional field: The emergence of coworking spaces for digital business models International. Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1465–1481.  Google Scholar
  9. Bouncken, R. B., Qiu, Y. und García, F. J. S. (2021a): Flexible pattern matching approach: Suggestions for augmenting theory evolvement. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 167: 120685.  Google Scholar
  10. Bouncken, R. B., Qiu, Y., Sinkovics, N. und Kürsten, W. (2021b): Qualitative research: Extending the range with flexible pattern matching. Review of Managerial Science, 15 (2), 251–273.  Google Scholar
  11. Bouncken, R. B., Ratzmann, M., Barwinski, R. und Kraus, S. (2020a): Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 102–110.  Google Scholar
  12. Bouncken, R. B. und Reuschl, A. J. (2017): Coworking-spaces: Chancen für Entrepreneurship und business model design. ZfKE–Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 151–168.  Google Scholar
  13. Bouncken, R. B. und Reuschl, A. J. (2018): Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 317–334.  Google Scholar
  14. Cascio, W. F. (1999): Virtual workplaces: Implications for organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6 (1).  Google Scholar
  15. Cloutier, C. und Ravasi, D. (2020): Identity trajectories: Explaining long-term patterns of continuity and change in organizational identities. Academy of Management Journal, 1196–1235.  Google Scholar
  16. Danielzyk, R., Dittrich-Wesbuer, A., Hilti, N., und Tippel, C. (2020): Multilokale Lebensführungen und räumliche Entwicklungen: Ein Kompendium: Forschungsberichte der ARL.  Google Scholar
  17. Earley, P. C. und Mosakowski, E. (2000): Creating Hybrid Team Cultures: An Empirical Test of Transnational Team Functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 26–49.  Google Scholar
  18. Garkisch, M. (2020): Die Zukunft von KMU im ländlichen Raum gestalten: Kollaboration als zentrales Handlungsmuster für das Managament von Innovationen. ZfKE–Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 57–63.  Google Scholar
  19. Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M. und Bacevice, P. A. (2017): Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 821–842.  Google Scholar
  20. Hackl, B., Wagner, M., Attmer, L. und Baumann, D. (2017): New Work: Auf dem Weg zur neuen Arbeitswelt: Management-Impulse, Praxisbeispiele, Studien: Springer-Verlag.  Google Scholar
  21. Halford, S. (2005): Hybrid workspace: Re‐spatialisations of work, organisation and management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 19–33.  Google Scholar
  22. Haynes, B. P. (2008): The impact of office layout on productivity. Journal of Facilities Management.  Google Scholar
  23. Hofmann, J., Piele, A., Piele, C. und Springel, S. (2019): New Work: Best Practices und Zukunftsmodelle. Arbeitsbericht Fraunhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation, Stuttgart.  Google Scholar
  24. Huber, T. und Rauch, C. (2013): Signium International. Generation Y – Das Selbstverständnis der Manager von morgen.  Google Scholar
  25. Kazekami, S. (2020): Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. Telecommunications Policy, 101868.  Google Scholar
  26. KFW (2019): https://www.kfw.de/KfW-Konzern/KfW-Research/Mittelstand.html, abgerufen am 04.03.21.  Google Scholar
  27. Kossek, E., Lewis, S. und Hammer, L. B. (2010): Work-life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human relations, 3–19.  Google Scholar
  28. Lin, Z. Zhao, X., Ismail, K. M., und Carley, K. M. (2006): Organizational design and restructuring in response to crises: Lessons from computational modeling and real-world cases. Organization Science, 598–618.  Google Scholar
  29. Mann, S. und Holdsworth, L. (2003): The psychological impact of teleworking: stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment, 196–211.  Google Scholar
  30. Mesmer, A. (2020): So machen es IBM, Microsoft und Porsche: Unternehmen planen mit hybriden Arbeitsmodellen, Computerwoche.  Google Scholar
  31. Müller, S. L., Shehadeh, M. A., Schröder, S., Richert, A. und Jeschke, S. (2018): An overview of work analysis instruments for hybrid production workplaces. AI und SOCIETY, 425–432.  Google Scholar
  32. Oldenburg, R. (1999): The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community: Da Capo Press.  Google Scholar
  33. Olson, M. H. und Primps, S. B. (1984): Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues. Journal of Social Issues, 97–112.  Google Scholar
  34. Olson-Buchanan, J. B. und Boswell, W. R. (2006): Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational behavior, 432–445.  Google Scholar
  35. Ovaska, U., Bergs, R., Goodwin-Hawkins, B., Heley, J. und Oedl-Wieser, T. (2020): Multilocality. R.P.I.a.S.S.S. Report (Ed.).  Google Scholar
  36. Petzold, K. (2017): Mobility experience and mobility decision‐making: An experiment on permanent migration and residential multilocality. Population, Space and Place, e2065.  Google Scholar
  37. Phillips, M. N. und Remke, T. (2017): Bürowelten – Büroarchitektur im Wandel. Kreativräume. Hochschule Coburg.  Google Scholar
  38. Pyo, S. und Bouncken, R. B. (2003): Knowledge management in hospitality and tourism. CRC Press.  Google Scholar
  39. Raghuram, S. und Wiesenfeld, B. (2004): Work-nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Human Resource Management, 259–277.  Google Scholar
  40. Schein, E. H. (1984): Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture. Sloan Management Review, 3–16.  Google Scholar
  41. Schönebeck, G. und Kratzer, J. (2010): Barrieren und Widerstände als Hemmnisse im Intrapreneurship-Prozess-Eine empirische Studie. ZfKE–Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 267–287.  Google Scholar
  42. Schwaber, K. und Sutherland, J. (2017): The Scrum Guide: The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game. scrum.org.  Google Scholar
  43. Vasiliki, C., Evertz, L. und Süß, S. (2020): Digitale Transformation im Handwerk: Eine qualitative Analyse der individuellen Veränderungsbereitschaft, ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 68 (3–4), 149–168.  Google Scholar
  44. Waters-Lynch, J. und Duff, C. (2021): The affective commons of coworking. Human Relations, 383–404.  Google Scholar
  45. Xie, J. L., Elangovan, A., Hu, J. und Hrabluik, C. (2019): Charting new terrain in work design: A study of hybrid work characteristics. Applied Psychology, 479–512.  Google Scholar
  46. Halford, S. (2005): Hybrid workspace: Re-spatialisations of work, organisation and management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 19–33.  Google Scholar
  47. Haynes, B. P. (2008): The impact of office layout on productivity. Journal of Facilities Management.  Google Scholar
  48. Hofmann, J., Piele, A., Piele, C. und Springel, S. (2019): New Work: Best Practices und Zukunftsmodelle. Arbeitsbericht Fraunhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation, Stuttgart.  Google Scholar
  49. Huber, T. und Rauch, C. (2013): Signium International. Generation Y – Das Selbstverständnis der Manager von morgen.  Google Scholar
  50. Phillips, M. N. und Remke, T. (2017): Bürowelten – Büroarchitektur im Wandel. Kreativräume. Hochschule Coburg.  Google Scholar
  51. Pyo, S. und Bouncken, R. B. (2003): Knowledge management in hospitality and tourism. CRC Press.  Google Scholar
  52. Raghuram, S. und Wiesenfeld, B. (2004): Work-nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Human Resource Management, 259–277.  Google Scholar
  53. Schein, E. H. (1984): Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture. Sloan Management Review, 3–16.  Google Scholar
  54. Schönebeck, G. und Kratzer, J. (2010): Barrieren und Widerstände als Hemmnisse im Intrapreneurship-Prozess-Eine empirische Studie. ZfKE–Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 267–287.  Google Scholar
  55. Schwaber, K. und Sutherland, J. (2017): The Scrum Guide: The Definitive Guide to Scrum: The Rules of the Game. scrum.org.  Google Scholar
  56. Vasiliki, C., Evertz, L. und Süß, S. (2020): Digitale Transformation im Handwerk: Eine qualitative Analyse der individuellen Veränderungsbereitschaft, ZfKE – Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 68 (3–4), 149–168.  Google Scholar
  57. Waters-Lynch, J. und Duff, C. (2021): The affective commons of coworking. Human Relations, 383–404.  Google Scholar
  58. Xie, J. L., Elangovan, A., Hu, J. und Hrabluik, C. (2019): Charting new terrain in work design: A study of hybrid work characteristics. Applied Psychology, 479–512.  Google Scholar
  59. Kossek, E., Lewis, S. und Hammer, L. B. (2010): Work-life initiatives and organizational change: Overcoming mixed messages to move from the margin to the mainstream. Human relations, 3–19.  Google Scholar
  60. Lin, Z. Zhao, X., Ismail, K. M., und Carley, K. M. (2006): Organizational design and restructuring in response to crises: Lessons from computational modeling and real-world cases. Organization Science, 598–618.  Google Scholar
  61. Mann, S. und Holdsworth, L. (2003): The psychological impact of teleworking: stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment, 196–211.  Google Scholar
  62. Mesmer, A. (2020): So machen es IBM, Microsoft und Porsche: Unternehmen planen mit hybriden Arbeitsmodellen, Computerwoche.  Google Scholar
  63. Müller, S. L., Shehadeh, M. A., Schröder, S., Richert, A. und Jeschke, S. (2018): An overview of work analysis instruments for hybrid production workplaces. AI und SOCIETY, 425–432.  Google Scholar
  64. Oldenburg, R. (1999): The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community: Da Capo Press.  Google Scholar
  65. Olson, M. H. und Primps, S. B. (1984): Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues. Journal of Social Issues, 97–112.  Google Scholar
  66. Olson-Buchanan, J. B. und Boswell, W. R. (2006): Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational behavior, 432–445.  Google Scholar
  67. Ovaska, U., Bergs, R., Goodwin-Hawkins, B., Heley, J. und Oedl-Wieser, T. (2020): Multilocality. R.P.I.a.S.S.S. Report (Ed.).  Google Scholar
  68. Petzold, K. (2017): Mobility experience and mobility decision-making: An experiment on permanent migration and residential multilocality. Population, Space and Place, e2065.  Google Scholar
  69. KFW (2019): https://www.kfw.de/KfW-Konzern/KfW-Research/Mittelstand.html, abgerufen am 04.03.21.  Google Scholar
  70. Kazekami, S. (2020): Mechanisms to improve labor productivity by performing telework. Telecommunications Policy, 101868.  Google Scholar
  71. Hackl, B., Wagner, M., Attmer, L. und Baumann, D. (2017): New Work: Auf dem Weg zur neuen Arbeitswelt: Management-Impulse, Praxisbeispiele, Studien: Springer-Verlag.  Google Scholar
  72. Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M. und Bacevice, P. A. (2017): Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 821–842.  Google Scholar
  73. Garkisch, M. (2020): Die Zukunft von KMU im ländlichen Raum gestalten: Kollaboration als zentrales Handlungsmuster für das Managament von Innovationen. ZfKE–Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 57–63.  Google Scholar
  74. Earley, P. C. und Mosakowski, E. (2000): Creating Hybrid Team Cultures: An Empirical Test of Transnational Team Functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 26–49.  Google Scholar
  75. Danielzyk, R., Dittrich-Wesbuer, A., Hilti, N., und Tippel, C. (2020): Multilokale Lebensführungen und räumliche Entwicklungen: Ein Kompendium: Forschungsberichte der ARL.  Google Scholar
  76. Cloutier, C. und Ravasi, D. (2020): Identity trajectories: Explaining long-term patterns of continuity and change in organizational identities. Academy of Management Journal, 1196–1235.  Google Scholar
  77. Cascio, W. F. (1999): Virtual workplaces: Implications for organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 6 (1).  Google Scholar
  78. Bouncken, R. B. und Reuschl, A. J. (2018): Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 317–334.  Google Scholar
  79. Bouncken, R. B. und Reuschl, A. J. (2017): Coworking-spaces: Chancen für Entrepreneurship und business model design. ZfKE–Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 151–168.  Google Scholar
  80. Bouncken, R. B., Ratzmann, M., Barwinski, R. und Kraus, S. (2020a): Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 102–110.  Google Scholar
  81. Bouncken, R. B., Qiu, Y., Sinkovics, N. und Kürsten, W. (2021b): Qualitative research: Extending the range with flexible pattern matching. Review of Managerial Science, 15 (2), 251–273.  Google Scholar
  82. Bouncken, R. B., Qiu, Y. und García, F. J. S. (2021a): Flexible pattern matching approach: Suggestions for augmenting theory evolvement. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 167: 120685.  Google Scholar
  83. Bouncken, R. B., Kraus, S. und Martínez-Pérez, J. F. (2020b): Entrepreneurship of an institutional field: The emergence of coworking spaces for digital business models International. Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1465–1481.  Google Scholar
  84. Bouncken, R. B. und Barwinski, R. (2020): Shared digital identity and rich knowledge ties in global 3D printing – a drizzle in the clouds? Global Strategy Journal, 81–108.  Google Scholar
  85. Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M. und Reuschl, A. J. (2018): The dark side of entrepreneurship in coworking-spaces, in: Porcar, A. T. und Soriano, D. R. (Hrsg.): Inside the mind of the entrepreneur, 1. Aufl., Springer, 135–147.  Google Scholar
  86. Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M. und Qiu, Y. (2021): Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 119–130.  Google Scholar
  87. Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J. und Ying, Z. J. (2015): Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 165–218.  Google Scholar
  88. Bentley, T., Teo, S., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R. und Gloet, M. (2016): The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics, 207–215.  Google Scholar
  89. Baruch, Y. (2000): Teleworking: benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New technology, work and employment, 34–49.  Google Scholar
  90. Allen, D. (2015): Getting things done: The art of stress-free productivity: Penguin.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Hybrid Multi-local Work: "New Work" Potentials in Remote, Co-working and SME Offices

Hybrid multilocal work describes the combination of mobile, semi-mobile, and office-based working, which enables the location and time-independent flexibility to choose how, when, and from where employees want to work. This study introduces the concept of hybrid multilocal work, which combines home office, company, and third place. We explain important challenges for small and medium-sized enterprises and give design re­commendations on three different impact levels (functional, cultural, and design level).

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Ricarda B. Bouncken / Till Marius Gantert: Hybride multilokale Arbeit: „New Work“ Potenziale im Remote-, Co-working- und KMU-Office 1
Zusammenfassung 1
Abstract 1
I. Einleitung 2
II. Theoretische Grundlagen 3
1. New Work und Anforderungen an die moderne Arbeitswelt 3
2. Mobilität und Multilokalität der heutigen Arbeit 4
a) Homeoffice als First Place – Revival seit Beginn der Pandemie 5
b) Der beliebige Third Place 5
III. Hybride multilokale Arbeit und deren Gestaltungsoptionen für KMU 7
1. Die hybride multilokale Arbeitsform 7
2. Hybride multilokale Gestaltungsoptionen für KMU 1
a) Funktionale Ebene 1
b) Kulturelle Ebene 1
c) Gestalterische Ebene 1
IV. Fazit und Ausblick 1
Literatur 1

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.