Menu Expand

Erfolgsfaktoren: Evidenz von börsenkotierten Unternehmen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz

  1. Journals
  2. Economics, Finance, Business & Management
  3. Der Betriebswirt
  4. Vol. 62, Issue 2
  5. pp. 99–122

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style
Lux, W., Waibel, R., Gehrig, M. Erfolgsfaktoren: Evidenz von börsenkotierten Unternehmen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Der Betriebswirt, 62(2), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.62.2.99
Lux, Wilfried; Waibel, Roland and Gehrig, Marco "Erfolgsfaktoren: Evidenz von börsenkotierten Unternehmen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz" Der Betriebswirt 62.2, 2021, 99-122. https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.62.2.99
Lux, Wilfried/Waibel, Roland/Gehrig, Marco (2021): Erfolgsfaktoren: Evidenz von börsenkotierten Unternehmen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz, in: Der Betriebswirt, vol. 62, iss. 2, 99-122, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.62.2.99
Format
Download

Erfolgsfaktoren: Evidenz von börsenkotierten Unternehmen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz

Lux, Wilfried | Waibel, Roland | Gehrig, Marco

Der Betriebswirt, Vol. 62 (2021), Iss. 2 : pp. 99–122

Preview Login to order (PDF)

Additional Information

Article Details

Publisher Name
Duncker & Humblot, Deutscher Betriebswirte Verlag
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3790/dbw.62.2.99
Language
German
Pages
24

Pricing

Individual
€ 26.00 (incl. local VAT if applicable)

Author Details

Wilfried Lux ist Professor für Finanzmanagement und Controlling an der OST Ostschweizer Fachhochschule und leitet dort das Kompetenzzentrum Finanzmanagement und Controlling.

Roland Waibel (†) war Professor für systemisches Management an der OST Ostschweizer Fachhochschule und leitete dort das Institut für Unternehmensführung.

Marco Gehrig, WP, ist Professor für Finanzmanagement und Controlling an der OST Ostschweizer Fachhochschule.

References

  1. Albers, S./Hildebrandt, L. (2006): Methodische Probleme bei der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung – Messfehler, formative versus reflektive Indikatoren und die Wahl des Strukturgleichungs-Modells. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung. 58(1), pp. 2–33.  Google Scholar
  2. Andras, T. L./Srinivasan, S. S. (2003): Advertising Intensitiy and R&D Intensitiy: Differences across Industries and their Impact on Firm’s Performance. International Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 2, issue 2, pp. 167–177.  Google Scholar
  3. Bailom, F. et al. (2013): Was Top-Unternehmen anders machen. Wien: Linde.  Google Scholar
  4. Baumgarth, C./Evanschitzki, H. (2009): Erfolgsfaktorenforschung, in: Empirische Mastertechniken. Springer. Pp. 235–261.  Google Scholar
  5. Baumgarth, C./Koch, J. (2009): Inhaltsanalyse, in: Empirische Mastertechniken. Springer.Pp. 131–163.  Google Scholar
  6. Baur, N./Blasius, J. (2014): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer.  Google Scholar
  7. Blundell, R./Griffith, R./van Reenen, J. (1999): Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms, in: Review of Economic Studies, vol. 66, issue 3, pp. 529–554.  Google Scholar
  8. Boulding, W./Staelin, R. (1990): Environment, Market Share, and Market Power, in: Management Science, vol. 36, issue 10, pp. 1160–1177.  Google Scholar
  9. Brah, S. A./Wong, J. L./Rao, B. M. (2000): TQM and business performance in the service sector: A Singapore study, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 20, issue 11, pp. 1293–1312.  Google Scholar
  10. Bruch, H./Kowalevski, S. (2012): Zwischen Hochleistung und Erschöpfung. St. Gallen. Universität St. Gallen.  Google Scholar
  11. Buzzell, R. D. (2004): The PIMS program of strategy research: A retrospective appraisal, in: Journal of Business Research, vol. 57, issue 5, pp. 478–483.  Google Scholar
  12. Capon, N. et al. (1990): Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis, in: Management Science, vol. 36, issue 10, pp. 1143–1159.  Google Scholar
  13. Chang, H. L./Tang, F.-F. (2001): An Empirical Study on Strategic Entry Barriers in Singapore, in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 18, pp. 503–517.  Google Scholar
  14. Christensen et al. (2015): What is disruptive innovation?, in: Harvard Business Review, vol. 91, pp. 44–53.  Google Scholar
  15. Collins, J. (2011): Der Weg zu den Besten. Die sieben Management-Prinzipien für dauerhaften Unternehmenserfolg. Campus. New York.  Google Scholar
  16. Colombo, M. G./Croce, A./Murtinu, S. (2010): Ownership structure, Horizontal Agency Costs and the Performance of High-TechEntrepreneurial Firms, in: Small Business Economics, vol. 42, issue 2, pp. 265–282.  Google Scholar
  17. Dalton, D. R./Daily, C. M./Johnson, J. L./Ellstrand, A. E. (1999): Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis, in: The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 6, dec. 1999, pp. 674–686.  Google Scholar
  18. De Meuse, K. P./Vanderheiden, P. A./Bergmann, T. J. (1994): Announced layoffs: Their effect on corporate financial performance, in: Human Resource Management, vol. 33, issue 4.  Google Scholar
  19. Duppati, G./Sune, A./Samanta, N. (2017): Corporate Governance, research and development volatility and firm performance – Evidence from Spain and Ireland, in: McMillan (ed.): Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 5, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  20. Edeling, A./Himme, A. (2018): When does Market Share Matter? New Empirical Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of the Market Share-Performance Relationship, in: Journal of Marketing, vol. 82, May 2018, pp. 1–24.  Google Scholar
  21. Eurostat (1999): Unternehmensgröße und Rentabilität: Amt für öffentliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg.  Google Scholar
  22. Fang, E./Palmatier, R. W./Grewal, R. (2011): Effects of Customer and Innovation Asset Configuration Strategies on Firm Performance, in: Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 48, issue 3, pp. 587–602.  Google Scholar
  23. Forsmann, D. et al. (2013): Erfolgsfaktorenforschung.  Google Scholar
  24. Gläser, J./Laudel, G. (2010): Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  25. Gök, O./Peker, S. (2017): Understanding the links among innovation performance, market performance and financial performance, in: Review of Managerial Science, vol. 11, issue 3, no. 4, pp. 605–631.  Google Scholar
  26. Goffin, H. (2020): Erfolgsunternehmen – empirisch belegte Wege an die Spitze, Springer Gabler, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  27. Gülfen, T./Sule, Y. (2016): The Impact of Operating Expenditures on Firm Performance in Turkey: Evidence from Technology Sector, in: Ekonomika, vol. 62, Oct–Dec 2016, pp. 1–16.  Google Scholar
  28. Gunasekarage, A./Luong, H./Truong, T. T. (2020): Growth and Market Share Matrix, CEO Power, and Firm Performance, in: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59.  Google Scholar
  29. Heilmann, M. (2018): Korrelation von Erfolgsfaktoren als Problem der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung. Erfolgsfaktorenforschung auf den Zahl gefühlt, 20.  Google Scholar
  30. Hofstede, G. et al. (2010): Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, New York.  Google Scholar
  31. Herrmann, A. et al. (2007): Handbuch Marktforschung, Gabler, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  32. Homburg, C./Krohmer, H. (2004): Die Fliegenpatsche als Instrument des wissenschaftlichen Dialogs, in: Wissenschaftliche Arbeitspapiere, Nr. W74, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim.  Google Scholar
  33. Joyce, W. et al. (2003): What really works. The 4 + 2 formula for sustained business success, Harper, New York.  Google Scholar
  34. Kang, W./Montoya, M. (2014): The Impact of Product Portfolio Strategy on Financial Performance: The Roles of Product Development and Market Entry Decisions, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, issue 3.  Google Scholar
  35. Karakaya, F./Parayitam, S. (2012): Barriers to entry and firm performance: a proposed model and curvilinear relationsships, in: Journal of Strategic Marketing, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 25–47.  Google Scholar
  36. Kennington, C./Sekhon, H. (2000): Buyer seller relationships in the UK insurance market: Does performance match market share?, in: Journal of Financial Services Marketing, vol. 5, pp. 40–48.  Google Scholar
  37. Kotabe, M./Karunamoorthy, S./Aulakh, P. S. (2002): Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R&D and Marketing Capabilities, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 79–97.  Google Scholar
  38. Krasnikov, A./Jayachandran, S. (2008): The Relative Impact of Marketing, Research-and-Development, and Operations Capabilities on Firm Performance, in: Journal of Marketing, vol. 72, issue 4, pp. 1–11.  Google Scholar
  39. Kuckartz, U. (2018): Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, in: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung, 4. Auflage.  Google Scholar
  40. Lee, C.-C. (2013): Business service market share, international operation strategy and performance, in: Baltic Journal of Management, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 463–485.  Google Scholar
  41. Lee, J. (2009): Does Size Matter in Firm Performance? Evidence from US Public Firms, in: International Journal of the Economics of Business 16(2), pp. 189–203.  Google Scholar
  42. Li, Y./Chiu, Y./Lin, T./Huang, Y.Y. (2019): Market share and performance in Taiwanese banks: min/max SBM DEA, in: TOP – An official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 27, Feb 2019.  Google Scholar
  43. Lorentz, H./Töyli, J./Solakivi, T./Hälinen, H.-M. (2012): Effects of geographic dispersion on intra-firm supply chain performance, in: Supply Chain Management, vol. 17, issue 6, pp. 611–626.  Google Scholar
  44. Lux, W. (2010): Performance Management: Effiziente Strategieentwicklung und -umsetzung, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.  Google Scholar
  45. Mathur, I./Singh, M./Gleason, K.C. (2004): Multinational Diversification and Corporate Performance: Evidence from European Firms, in: European Financial Management, vol. 10, issue 3, pp. 439–464.  Google Scholar
  46. Mordelle, E. (2020): Das sind die besten Verwaltungsräte. Verwaltungsrats-Ranking 2020, in: Finanz und Wirtschaft, 55, 11. Juli 2020, pp. 8–15.  Google Scholar
  47. Muchemwa, R./Padia, N./Callaghan, C. W. (2016): Board Composition, Board Size and Financial Performance of Johannesburg Stock Exchange Companies, in: South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS), 19 (4), pp. 497–513.  Google Scholar
  48. Muchtar, D./Nor, F. M./Albra, W./Arifai, M./Ahmar, A. S. (2018): Dynamic Performance of Indonesian public companies: An analysis of financial decision behavior, in: Elgammal, M.M. (ed.): Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 6, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  49. Nakamura, E. (2011): Does Environmental Investment Really Contribute to Firm Performance? An Empirical Analysis Using Japanes Firms, in: Eurasian Business Review, vol. 1.  Google Scholar
  50. O’Regan, N. (2002): Market Share: The conduit to future success?, in: European Business Review 14 (4), pp. 287–293.  Google Scholar
  51. Pehrsson, A. (2009): Barriers to entry and market strategy: a literature review and a proposed model, in: European Business Review, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 64–77.  Google Scholar
  52. Pennington, M. (2004): The Myth of Market Share: Why Market Share is the Fool’s Gold of Business, in: Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 245–247.  Google Scholar
  53. Porter, M. (2014): Wettbewerbsvorteile: Spitzenleistungen erreichen und behaupten, Campus, Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  54. Post, C./Byron, K. (2015): Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis, in: Academy of Management vol. 58, no. 5.  Google Scholar
  55. Qureshi, M. A./Yousaf, M. (2014): Determinants of profit heterogeneity at firm level: evidence from Pakistan, in: International Journal of Commerce and Management, vol. 24, pp. 25–39.  Google Scholar
  56. Raynor, M./Ahmed, M. (2013): The three rules – How exceptional companies think, Portfolio, New York.  Google Scholar
  57. Roberts, P. W./Dowling, G.R. (2002): Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23, issue 12, Dec 2002, pp. 1077–1093.  Google Scholar
  58. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2015): Company financial performance: Does board size matter? Case of the EUROSTOXX50 index, in: Cuadernos de Gestion, vol. 15, no. 2 (2015), pp. 15–38.  Google Scholar
  59. Sardana, D./Gupta, N./Kumar, V./Terziovski, M. (2020): CSR ‚sustainability‘ practices and firm performance in an emerging economy, in: Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (3), Feb. 2020.  Google Scholar
  60. Sardo, F./Serrasqueiro, Z./Alves, H. (2018): On the relationship between intellectual capital and financial performance: A panel data analysis on SME hotels, in: International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 75, Sept. 2018, pp. 67–74.  Google Scholar
  61. Seifzadeh, P. (2016): Corporate Controls, Geographic dispersion, and their effect on Corporate Financial Performance in Related Diversified Corporations, in: Journal of Strategy and Management, vol. 10, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  62. Shukla, R. (2020): Market Structure, Entry Barriers, and Firm’s R&D Intensity: Panel Data Evidence from Electronics Goods Sector in India, in: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 20, issue 1, pp. 115–137.  Google Scholar
  63. Simon, H. (1996): Die heimlichen Gewinner. Die Erfolgsstrategien unbekannter Weltmarktführer, Econ, München.  Google Scholar
  64. Singh, A. K./Singhania, S./Sardana, V. (2019): Do Women of Boards affect Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from Indian IPO Firms, in: Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, vol. 13, issue 2 (Women in Business in India), pp. 53–68.  Google Scholar
  65. Singla, H. K. (2011): Does Firm Size Affect Profitability? An Empirical Investigation of Indian Textile Industry, in: Paradigm, vol. XV, no. 1&2 (combined issue), pp. 18–25.  Google Scholar
  66. Smith, R.E./Wright, W. F. (2004): Determinants of Customer Loyalty and Financial Performance, in: Journal of Management Accounting Research 16 (1), pp. 183–205.  Google Scholar
  67. Stank, T. P./Goldsby, T. J./Vickery, S. K./Savitskie, K. (2003): Logistics Service Performance: Estimating its Influence on Market Share, in: Journal of Business Logistics, vol 24, issue 1, pp. 27–55.  Google Scholar
  68. Vafaei, A./Ahmed, K./Mather, P. (2015): Board Diversity and Financial Performance in the Top 500 Australian Firms, in: AAR – Australian Accounting Review, vol. 25, issue 4, Dec 2015, pp. 413–427.  Google Scholar
  69. Waibel, R. et al. (2019): Betriebswirtschaft für Führungspersonen. Die Erfolgslogik unternehmerischen Denkens und Handelns, Versus, Zürich.  Google Scholar
  70. Zelgalve, E./Berzkalne, I. (2015): The Impact of Debt Ratios on Corporate Financial Performance: the Case of Baltic Listed Companies, in: Applied Economics: Systematic Research, vol. 9.  Google Scholar
  71. Fang, E./Palmatier, R. W./Grewal, R. (2011): Effects of Customer and Innovation Asset Configuration Strategies on Firm Performance, in: Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 48, issue 3, pp. 587–602.  Google Scholar
  72. Forsmann, D. et al. (2013): Erfolgsfaktorenforschung.  Google Scholar
  73. Gläser, J./Laudel, G. (2010): Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  74. Gök, O./Peker, S. (2017): Understanding the links among innovation performance, market performance and financial performance, in: Review of Managerial Science, vol. 11, issue 3, no. 4, pp. 605–631.  Google Scholar
  75. Goffin, H. (2020): Erfolgsunternehmen – empirisch belegte Wege an die Spitze, Springer Gabler, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  76. Gülfen, T./Sule, Y. (2016): The Impact of Operating Expenditures on Firm Performance in Turkey: Evidence from Technology Sector, in: Ekonomika, vol. 62, Oct–Dec 2016, pp. 1–16.  Google Scholar
  77. Gunasekarage, A./Luong, H./Truong, T. T. (2020): Growth and Market Share Matrix, CEO Power, and Firm Performance, in: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59.  Google Scholar
  78. Heilmann, M. (2018): Korrelation von Erfolgsfaktoren als Problem der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung. Erfolgsfaktorenforschung auf den Zahl gefühlt, 20.  Google Scholar
  79. Hofstede, G. et al. (2010): Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, New York.  Google Scholar
  80. Herrmann, A. et al. (2007): Handbuch Marktforschung, Gabler, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  81. Homburg, C./Krohmer, H. (2004): Die Fliegenpatsche als Instrument des wissenschaftlichen Dialogs, in: Wissenschaftliche Arbeitspapiere, Nr. W74, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim.  Google Scholar
  82. Joyce, W. et al. (2003): What really works. The 4 + 2 formula for sustained business success, Harper, New York.  Google Scholar
  83. Kang, W./Montoya, M. (2014): The Impact of Product Portfolio Strategy on Financial Performance: The Roles of Product Development and Market Entry Decisions, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, issue 3.  Google Scholar
  84. Karakaya, F./Parayitam, S. (2012): Barriers to entry and firm performance: a proposed model and curvilinear relationsships, in: Journal of Strategic Marketing, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 25–47.  Google Scholar
  85. Kennington, C./Sekhon, H. (2000): Buyer seller relationships in the UK insurance market: Does performance match market share?, in: Journal of Financial Services Marketing, vol. 5, pp. 40–48.  Google Scholar
  86. Kotabe, M./Karunamoorthy, S./Aulakh, P. S. (2002): Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R&D and Marketing Capabilities, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 79–97.  Google Scholar
  87. Albers, S./Hildebrandt, L. (2006): Methodische Probleme bei der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung – Messfehler, formative versus reflektive Indikatoren und die Wahl des Strukturgleichungs-Modells. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung. 58(1), pp. 2–33.  Google Scholar
  88. Andras, T. L./Srinivasan, S. S. (2003): Advertising Intensitiy and R&D Intensitiy: Differences across Industries and their Impact on Firm’s Performance. International Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 2, issue 2, pp. 167–177.  Google Scholar
  89. Bailom, F. et al. (2013): Was Top-Unternehmen anders machen. Wien: Linde.  Google Scholar
  90. Baumgarth, C./Evanschitzki, H. (2009): Erfolgsfaktorenforschung, in: Empirische Mastertechniken. Springer. Pp. 235–261.  Google Scholar
  91. Baumgarth, C./Koch, J. (2009): Inhaltsanalyse, in: Empirische Mastertechniken. Springer.Pp. 131–163.  Google Scholar
  92. Baur, N./Blasius, J. (2014): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer.  Google Scholar
  93. Blundell, R./Griffith, R./van Reenen, J. (1999): Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms, in: Review of Economic Studies, vol. 66, issue 3, pp. 529–554.  Google Scholar
  94. Boulding, W./Staelin, R. (1990): Environment, Market Share, and Market Power, in: Management Science, vol. 36, issue 10, pp. 1160–1177.  Google Scholar
  95. Brah, S. A./Wong, J. L./Rao, B. M. (2000): TQM and business performance in the service sector: A Singapore study, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 20, issue 11, pp. 1293–1312.  Google Scholar
  96. Bruch, H./Kowalevski, S. (2012): Zwischen Hochleistung und Erschöpfung. St. Gallen. Universität St. Gallen.  Google Scholar
  97. Buzzell, R. D. (2004): The PIMS program of strategy research: A retrospective appraisal, in: Journal of Business Research, vol. 57, issue 5, pp. 478–483.  Google Scholar
  98. Capon, N. et al. (1990): Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis, in: Management Science, vol. 36, issue 10, pp. 1143–1159.  Google Scholar
  99. Chang, H. L./Tang, F.-F. (2001): An Empirical Study on Strategic Entry Barriers in Singapore, in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 18, pp. 503–517.  Google Scholar
  100. Christensen et al. (2015): What is disruptive innovation?, in: Harvard Business Review, vol. 91, pp. 44–53.  Google Scholar
  101. Collins, J. (2011): Der Weg zu den Besten. Die sieben Management-Prinzipien für dauerhaften Unternehmenserfolg. Campus. New York.  Google Scholar
  102. Colombo, M. G./Croce, A./Murtinu, S. (2010): Ownership structure, Horizontal Agency Costs and the Performance of High-TechEntrepreneurial Firms, in: Small Business Economics, vol. 42, issue 2, pp. 265–282.  Google Scholar
  103. Dalton, D. R./Daily, C. M./Johnson, J. L./Ellstrand, A. E. (1999): Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis, in: The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 6, dec. 1999, pp. 674–686.  Google Scholar
  104. De Meuse, K. P./Vanderheiden, P. A./Bergmann, T. J. (1994): Announced layoffs: Their effect on corporate financial performance, in: Human Resource Management, vol. 33, issue 4.  Google Scholar
  105. Duppati, G./Sune, A./Samanta, N. (2017): Corporate Governance, research and development volatility and firm performance – Evidence from Spain and Ireland, in: McMillan (ed.): Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 5, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  106. Edeling, A./Himme, A. (2018): When does Market Share Matter? New Empirical Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of the Market Share-Performance Relationship, in: Journal of Marketing, vol. 82, May 2018, pp. 1–24.  Google Scholar
  107. Eurostat (1999): Unternehmensgröße und Rentabilität: Amt für öffentliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg.  Google Scholar
  108. Shukla, R. (2020): Market Structure, Entry Barriers, and Firm’s R&D Intensity: Panel Data Evidence from Electronics Goods Sector in India, in: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 20, issue 1, pp. 115–137.  Google Scholar
  109. Simon, H. (1996): Die heimlichen Gewinner. Die Erfolgsstrategien unbekannter Weltmarktführer, Econ, München.  Google Scholar
  110. Singh, A. K./Singhania, S./Sardana, V. (2019): Do Women of Boards affect Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from Indian IPO Firms, in: Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, vol. 13, issue 2 (Women in Business in India), pp. 53–68.  Google Scholar
  111. Singla, H. K. (2011): Does Firm Size Affect Profitability? An Empirical Investigation of Indian Textile Industry, in: Paradigm, vol. XV, no. 1&2 (combined issue), pp. 18–25.  Google Scholar
  112. Smith, R.E./Wright, W. F. (2004): Determinants of Customer Loyalty and Financial Performance, in: Journal of Management Accounting Research 16 (1), pp. 183–205.  Google Scholar
  113. Stank, T. P./Goldsby, T. J./Vickery, S. K./Savitskie, K. (2003): Logistics Service Performance: Estimating its Influence on Market Share, in: Journal of Business Logistics, vol 24, issue 1, pp. 27–55.  Google Scholar
  114. Vafaei, A./Ahmed, K./Mather, P. (2015): Board Diversity and Financial Performance in the Top 500 Australian Firms, in: AAR – Australian Accounting Review, vol. 25, issue 4, Dec 2015, pp. 413–427.  Google Scholar
  115. Waibel, R. et al. (2019): Betriebswirtschaft für Führungspersonen. Die Erfolgslogik unternehmerischen Denkens und Handelns, Versus, Zürich.  Google Scholar
  116. Zelgalve, E./Berzkalne, I. (2015): The Impact of Debt Ratios on Corporate Financial Performance: the Case of Baltic Listed Companies, in: Applied Economics: Systematic Research, vol. 9.  Google Scholar
  117. Seifzadeh, P. (2016): Corporate Controls, Geographic dispersion, and their effect on Corporate Financial Performance in Related Diversified Corporations, in: Journal of Strategy and Management, vol. 10, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  118. Sardo, F./Serrasqueiro, Z./Alves, H. (2018): On the relationship between intellectual capital and financial performance: A panel data analysis on SME hotels, in: International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 75, Sept. 2018, pp. 67–74.  Google Scholar
  119. Sardana, D./Gupta, N./Kumar, V./Terziovski, M. (2020): CSR ‚sustainability‘ practices and firm performance in an emerging economy, in: Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (3), Feb. 2020.  Google Scholar
  120. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2015): Company financial performance: Does board size matter? Case of the EUROSTOXX50 index, in: Cuadernos de Gestion, vol. 15, no. 2 (2015), pp. 15–38.  Google Scholar
  121. Roberts, P. W./Dowling, G.R. (2002): Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23, issue 12, Dec 2002, pp. 1077–1093.  Google Scholar
  122. Raynor, M./Ahmed, M. (2013): The three rules – How exceptional companies think, Portfolio, New York.  Google Scholar
  123. Qureshi, M. A./Yousaf, M. (2014): Determinants of profit heterogeneity at firm level: evidence from Pakistan, in: International Journal of Commerce and Management, vol. 24, pp. 25–39.  Google Scholar
  124. Post, C./Byron, K. (2015): Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis, in: Academy of Management vol. 58, no. 5.  Google Scholar
  125. Porter, M. (2014): Wettbewerbsvorteile: Spitzenleistungen erreichen und behaupten, Campus, Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  126. Pennington, M. (2004): The Myth of Market Share: Why Market Share is the Fool’s Gold of Business, in: Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 245–247.  Google Scholar
  127. Pehrsson, A. (2009): Barriers to entry and market strategy: a literature review and a proposed model, in: European Business Review, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 64–77.  Google Scholar
  128. O’Regan, N. (2002): Market Share: The conduit to future success?, in: European Business Review 14 (4), pp. 287–293.  Google Scholar
  129. Nakamura, E. (2011): Does Environmental Investment Really Contribute to Firm Performance? An Empirical Analysis Using Japanes Firms, in: Eurasian Business Review, vol. 1.  Google Scholar
  130. Muchtar, D./Nor, F. M./Albra, W./Arifai, M./Ahmar, A. S. (2018): Dynamic Performance of Indonesian public companies: An analysis of financial decision behavior, in: Elgammal, M.M. (ed.): Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 6, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  131. Muchemwa, R./Padia, N./Callaghan, C. W. (2016): Board Composition, Board Size and Financial Performance of Johannesburg Stock Exchange Companies, in: South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS), 19 (4), pp. 497–513.  Google Scholar
  132. Mordelle, E. (2020): Das sind die besten Verwaltungsräte. Verwaltungsrats-Ranking 2020, in: Finanz und Wirtschaft, 55, 11. Juli 2020, pp. 8–15.  Google Scholar
  133. Mathur, I./Singh, M./Gleason, K.C. (2004): Multinational Diversification and Corporate Performance: Evidence from European Firms, in: European Financial Management, vol. 10, issue 3, pp. 439–464.  Google Scholar
  134. Lux, W. (2010): Performance Management: Effiziente Strategieentwicklung und -umsetzung, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.  Google Scholar
  135. Lorentz, H./Töyli, J./Solakivi, T./Hälinen, H.-M. (2012): Effects of geographic dispersion on intra-firm supply chain performance, in: Supply Chain Management, vol. 17, issue 6, pp. 611–626.  Google Scholar
  136. Li, Y./Chiu, Y./Lin, T./Huang, Y.Y. (2019): Market share and performance in Taiwanese banks: min/max SBM DEA, in: TOP – An official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 27, Feb 2019.  Google Scholar
  137. Lee, J. (2009): Does Size Matter in Firm Performance? Evidence from US Public Firms, in: International Journal of the Economics of Business 16(2), pp. 189–203.  Google Scholar
  138. Lee, C.-C. (2013): Business service market share, international operation strategy and performance, in: Baltic Journal of Management, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 463–485.  Google Scholar
  139. Kuckartz, U. (2018): Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, in: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung, 4. Auflage.  Google Scholar
  140. Krasnikov, A./Jayachandran, S. (2008): The Relative Impact of Marketing, Research-and-Development, and Operations Capabilities on Firm Performance, in: Journal of Marketing, vol. 72, issue 4, pp. 1–11.  Google Scholar
  141. Albers, S./Hildebrandt, L. (2006): Methodische Probleme bei der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung – Messfehler, formative versus reflektive Indikatoren und die Wahl des Strukturgleichungs-Modells. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung. 58(1), pp. 2–33.  Google Scholar
  142. Andras, T. L./Srinivasan, S. S. (2003): Advertising Intensitiy and R&D Intensitiy: Differences across Industries and their Impact on Firm’s Performance. International Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 2, issue 2, pp. 167–177.  Google Scholar
  143. Bailom, F. et al. (2013): Was Top-Unternehmen anders machen. Wien: Linde.  Google Scholar
  144. Baumgarth, C./Evanschitzki, H. (2009): Erfolgsfaktorenforschung, in: Empirische Mastertechniken. Springer. Pp. 235–261.  Google Scholar
  145. Baumgarth, C./Koch, J. (2009): Inhaltsanalyse, in: Empirische Mastertechniken. Springer.Pp. 131–163.  Google Scholar
  146. Baur, N./Blasius, J. (2014): Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung. Springer.  Google Scholar
  147. Blundell, R./Griffith, R./van Reenen, J. (1999): Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms, in: Review of Economic Studies, vol. 66, issue 3, pp. 529–554.  Google Scholar
  148. Boulding, W./Staelin, R. (1990): Environment, Market Share, and Market Power, in: Management Science, vol. 36, issue 10, pp. 1160–1177.  Google Scholar
  149. Brah, S. A./Wong, J. L./Rao, B. M. (2000): TQM and business performance in the service sector: A Singapore study, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 20, issue 11, pp. 1293–1312.  Google Scholar
  150. Bruch, H./Kowalevski, S. (2012): Zwischen Hochleistung und Erschöpfung. St. Gallen. Universität St. Gallen.  Google Scholar
  151. Buzzell, R. D. (2004): The PIMS program of strategy research: A retrospective appraisal, in: Journal of Business Research, vol. 57, issue 5, pp. 478–483.  Google Scholar
  152. Capon, N. et al. (1990): Determinants of financial performance: a meta-analysis, in: Management Science, vol. 36, issue 10, pp. 1143–1159.  Google Scholar
  153. Chang, H. L./Tang, F.-F. (2001): An Empirical Study on Strategic Entry Barriers in Singapore, in: Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 18, pp. 503–517.  Google Scholar
  154. Christensen et al. (2015): What is disruptive innovation?, in: Harvard Business Review, vol. 91, pp. 44–53.  Google Scholar
  155. Collins, J. (2011): Der Weg zu den Besten. Die sieben Management-Prinzipien für dauerhaften Unternehmenserfolg. Campus. New York.  Google Scholar
  156. Colombo, M. G./Croce, A./Murtinu, S. (2010): Ownership structure, Horizontal Agency Costs and the Performance of High-TechEntrepreneurial Firms, in: Small Business Economics, vol. 42, issue 2, pp. 265–282.  Google Scholar
  157. Dalton, D. R./Daily, C. M./Johnson, J. L./Ellstrand, A. E. (1999): Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis, in: The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 42, no. 6, dec. 1999, pp. 674–686.  Google Scholar
  158. De Meuse, K. P./Vanderheiden, P. A./Bergmann, T. J. (1994): Announced layoffs: Their effect on corporate financial performance, in: Human Resource Management, vol. 33, issue 4.  Google Scholar
  159. Duppati, G./Sune, A./Samanta, N. (2017): Corporate Governance, research and development volatility and firm performance – Evidence from Spain and Ireland, in: McMillan (ed.): Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 5, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  160. Edeling, A./Himme, A. (2018): When does Market Share Matter? New Empirical Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of the Market Share-Performance Relationship, in: Journal of Marketing, vol. 82, May 2018, pp. 1–24.  Google Scholar
  161. Eurostat (1999): Unternehmensgröße und Rentabilität: Amt für öffentliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg.  Google Scholar
  162. Fang, E./Palmatier, R. W./Grewal, R. (2011): Effects of Customer and Innovation Asset Configuration Strategies on Firm Performance, in: Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 48, issue 3, pp. 587–602.  Google Scholar
  163. Forsmann, D. et al. (2013): Erfolgsfaktorenforschung.  Google Scholar
  164. Gläser, J./Laudel, G. (2010): Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  165. Gök, O./Peker, S. (2017): Understanding the links among innovation performance, market performance and financial performance, in: Review of Managerial Science, vol. 11, issue 3, no. 4, pp. 605–631.  Google Scholar
  166. Goffin, H. (2020): Erfolgsunternehmen – empirisch belegte Wege an die Spitze, Springer Gabler, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  167. Gülfen, T./Sule, Y. (2016): The Impact of Operating Expenditures on Firm Performance in Turkey: Evidence from Technology Sector, in: Ekonomika, vol. 62, Oct–Dec 2016, pp. 1–16.  Google Scholar
  168. Gunasekarage, A./Luong, H./Truong, T. T. (2020): Growth and Market Share Matrix, CEO Power, and Firm Performance, in: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59.  Google Scholar
  169. Heilmann, M. (2018): Korrelation von Erfolgsfaktoren als Problem der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung. Erfolgsfaktorenforschung auf den Zahl gefühlt, 20.  Google Scholar
  170. Hofstede, G. et al. (2010): Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill, New York.  Google Scholar
  171. Herrmann, A. et al. (2007): Handbuch Marktforschung, Gabler, Berlin.  Google Scholar
  172. Homburg, C./Krohmer, H. (2004): Die Fliegenpatsche als Instrument des wissenschaftlichen Dialogs, in: Wissenschaftliche Arbeitspapiere, Nr. W74, Universität Mannheim, Mannheim.  Google Scholar
  173. Joyce, W. et al. (2003): What really works. The 4 + 2 formula for sustained business success, Harper, New York.  Google Scholar
  174. Kang, W./Montoya, M. (2014): The Impact of Product Portfolio Strategy on Financial Performance: The Roles of Product Development and Market Entry Decisions, in: Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 31, issue 3.  Google Scholar
  175. Karakaya, F./Parayitam, S. (2012): Barriers to entry and firm performance: a proposed model and curvilinear relationsships, in: Journal of Strategic Marketing, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 25–47.  Google Scholar
  176. Kennington, C./Sekhon, H. (2000): Buyer seller relationships in the UK insurance market: Does performance match market share?, in: Journal of Financial Services Marketing, vol. 5, pp. 40–48.  Google Scholar
  177. Kotabe, M./Karunamoorthy, S./Aulakh, P. S. (2002): Multinationality and Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of R&D and Marketing Capabilities, in: Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 33, issue 1, pp. 79–97.  Google Scholar
  178. Krasnikov, A./Jayachandran, S. (2008): The Relative Impact of Marketing, Research-and-Development, and Operations Capabilities on Firm Performance, in: Journal of Marketing, vol. 72, issue 4, pp. 1–11.  Google Scholar
  179. Kuckartz, U. (2018): Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse, in: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung, 4. Auflage.  Google Scholar
  180. Lee, C.-C. (2013): Business service market share, international operation strategy and performance, in: Baltic Journal of Management, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 463–485.  Google Scholar
  181. Lee, J. (2009): Does Size Matter in Firm Performance? Evidence from US Public Firms, in: International Journal of the Economics of Business 16(2), pp. 189–203.  Google Scholar
  182. Li, Y./Chiu, Y./Lin, T./Huang, Y.Y. (2019): Market share and performance in Taiwanese banks: min/max SBM DEA, in: TOP – An official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 27, Feb 2019.  Google Scholar
  183. Lorentz, H./Töyli, J./Solakivi, T./Hälinen, H.-M. (2012): Effects of geographic dispersion on intra-firm supply chain performance, in: Supply Chain Management, vol. 17, issue 6, pp. 611–626.  Google Scholar
  184. Lux, W. (2010): Performance Management: Effiziente Strategieentwicklung und -umsetzung, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.  Google Scholar
  185. Mathur, I./Singh, M./Gleason, K.C. (2004): Multinational Diversification and Corporate Performance: Evidence from European Firms, in: European Financial Management, vol. 10, issue 3, pp. 439–464.  Google Scholar
  186. Mordelle, E. (2020): Das sind die besten Verwaltungsräte. Verwaltungsrats-Ranking 2020, in: Finanz und Wirtschaft, 55, 11. Juli 2020, pp. 8–15.  Google Scholar
  187. Muchemwa, R./Padia, N./Callaghan, C. W. (2016): Board Composition, Board Size and Financial Performance of Johannesburg Stock Exchange Companies, in: South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences (SAJEMS), 19 (4), pp. 497–513.  Google Scholar
  188. Muchtar, D./Nor, F. M./Albra, W./Arifai, M./Ahmar, A. S. (2018): Dynamic Performance of Indonesian public companies: An analysis of financial decision behavior, in: Elgammal, M.M. (ed.): Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 6, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  189. Nakamura, E. (2011): Does Environmental Investment Really Contribute to Firm Performance? An Empirical Analysis Using Japanes Firms, in: Eurasian Business Review, vol. 1.  Google Scholar
  190. O’Regan, N. (2002): Market Share: The conduit to future success?, in: European Business Review 14 (4), pp. 287–293.  Google Scholar
  191. Pehrsson, A. (2009): Barriers to entry and market strategy: a literature review and a proposed model, in: European Business Review, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 64–77.  Google Scholar
  192. Pennington, M. (2004): The Myth of Market Share: Why Market Share is the Fool’s Gold of Business, in: Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 245–247.  Google Scholar
  193. Porter, M. (2014): Wettbewerbsvorteile: Spitzenleistungen erreichen und behaupten, Campus, Frankfurt.  Google Scholar
  194. Post, C./Byron, K. (2015): Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis, in: Academy of Management vol. 58, no. 5.  Google Scholar
  195. Qureshi, M. A./Yousaf, M. (2014): Determinants of profit heterogeneity at firm level: evidence from Pakistan, in: International Journal of Commerce and Management, vol. 24, pp. 25–39.  Google Scholar
  196. Raynor, M./Ahmed, M. (2013): The three rules – How exceptional companies think, Portfolio, New York.  Google Scholar
  197. Roberts, P. W./Dowling, G.R. (2002): Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 23, issue 12, Dec 2002, pp. 1077–1093.  Google Scholar
  198. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2015): Company financial performance: Does board size matter? Case of the EUROSTOXX50 index, in: Cuadernos de Gestion, vol. 15, no. 2 (2015), pp. 15–38.  Google Scholar
  199. Sardana, D./Gupta, N./Kumar, V./Terziovski, M. (2020): CSR ‚sustainability‘ practices and firm performance in an emerging economy, in: Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (3), Feb. 2020.  Google Scholar
  200. Sardo, F./Serrasqueiro, Z./Alves, H. (2018): On the relationship between intellectual capital and financial performance: A panel data analysis on SME hotels, in: International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 75, Sept. 2018, pp. 67–74.  Google Scholar
  201. Seifzadeh, P. (2016): Corporate Controls, Geographic dispersion, and their effect on Corporate Financial Performance in Related Diversified Corporations, in: Journal of Strategy and Management, vol. 10, issue 1.  Google Scholar
  202. Shukla, R. (2020): Market Structure, Entry Barriers, and Firm’s R&D Intensity: Panel Data Evidence from Electronics Goods Sector in India, in: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 20, issue 1, pp. 115–137.  Google Scholar
  203. Simon, H. (1996): Die heimlichen Gewinner. Die Erfolgsstrategien unbekannter Weltmarktführer, Econ, München.  Google Scholar
  204. Singh, A. K./Singhania, S./Sardana, V. (2019): Do Women of Boards affect Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from Indian IPO Firms, in: Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, vol. 13, issue 2 (Women in Business in India), pp. 53–68.  Google Scholar
  205. Singla, H. K. (2011): Does Firm Size Affect Profitability? An Empirical Investigation of Indian Textile Industry, in: Paradigm, vol. XV, no. 1&2 (combined issue), pp. 18–25.  Google Scholar
  206. Smith, R.E./Wright, W. F. (2004): Determinants of Customer Loyalty and Financial Performance, in: Journal of Management Accounting Research 16 (1), pp. 183–205.  Google Scholar
  207. Stank, T. P./Goldsby, T. J./Vickery, S. K./Savitskie, K. (2003): Logistics Service Performance: Estimating its Influence on Market Share, in: Journal of Business Logistics, vol 24, issue 1, pp. 27–55.  Google Scholar
  208. Vafaei, A./Ahmed, K./Mather, P. (2015): Board Diversity and Financial Performance in the Top 500 Australian Firms, in: AAR – Australian Accounting Review, vol. 25, issue 4, Dec 2015, pp. 413–427.  Google Scholar
  209. Waibel, R. et al. (2019): Betriebswirtschaft für Führungspersonen. Die Erfolgslogik unternehmerischen Denkens und Handelns, Versus, Zürich.  Google Scholar
  210. Zelgalve, E./Berzkalne, I. (2015): The Impact of Debt Ratios on Corporate Financial Performance: the Case of Baltic Listed Companies, in: Applied Economics: Systematic Research, vol. 9.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Based on extensive literature research, hypotheses have been derived in order to test the impact of success factors (independend varibles) on the success indicator ROA (return on assets). Those hypotheses have been tested quantitatively and have been validated by expert interviews. The result is a model containing ten success factors which have positive or negative correlations with the dependend variable. With this model it is possible to estimate the result of listed companies based on those ten factors.

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
Wilfried Lux / Roland Waibel / Marco Gehrig: Erfolgsfaktoren: Evidenz von börsenkotierten Unternehmen aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 1
Abstract 1
Zusammenfassung 1
1. Einführung und Zielsetzung 2
2. Methodisches Vorgehen 3
3. Theoretischer Kontext: Literaturanalyse zum aktuellen Stand der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung 5
4. Hypothesenformulierung und Vorgehen bei der quantitativen Analyse 9
5. Ergebnisse der quantitativen Analyse 1
6. Validierung bestehender und Exploration neuer Erfolgsfaktoren 1
7. Limitationen und Ausblick 1
Literatur 2

Contact

Duncker & Humblot GmbH Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 9 12165 Berlin, Deutschland T: +49 30 790006-0

Quick Navigation

2024 Duncker & Humblot GmbH

Powered by CloudPublish

We use cookies to ensure that you get the best experience on our website. Learn more about how we use cookies.