Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Louzek, M. Max Weber as an Economist: Revisiting Max Weber’s Legacy 100 Years after His Passing. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 140(2), 205-222. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.140.2.205
Louzek, Marek "Max Weber as an Economist: Revisiting Max Weber’s Legacy 100 Years after His Passing" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 140.2, 2020, 205-222. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.140.2.205
Louzek, Marek (2020): Max Weber as an Economist: Revisiting Max Weber’s Legacy 100 Years after His Passing, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 140, iss. 2, 205-222, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.140.2.205

Format

Max Weber as an Economist: Revisiting Max Weber’s Legacy 100 Years after His Passing

Louzek, Marek

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 140 (2020), Iss. 2 : pp. 205–222

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Marek Louzek, Faculty of Economics, Prague University of Economics and Business, W. Churchill Sq. 4, Prague 3, Czech Republic.

References

  1. Ackroyd, S. 1974. “Economic Rationality and the Relevance of Weberian Sociology to Industrial Relations.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 12 (2): 236 – 48.  Google Scholar
  2. Barbalet, J. 2008. Weber, Passion and Profits: ‘The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism’ in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  3. Curtis, T. D. 1968. “Marshall and Weber on Wealth and Property: A Comparative Appraisal.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 27 (1): 89 – 98.  Google Scholar
  4. Diehl, C. 1923. “Life and Work of Max Weber.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 38 (1): 87 – 107.  Google Scholar
  5. Eisermann, G. 1993. Max Weber und die Nationalökonomie. Marburg: Metropolis.  Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, M. (1953) 1970. Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  7. Ghosh, P. 2014. Max Weber and the Protestant Ethic: Twin Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  8. Giddens, A. 2007. “Introduction.” In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, vii–xxiv. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  9. Hagemann, H. 2016. “Concluding Remarks.” In The German Historical School and European Economic Thought, edited by J. L. Cardoso and M. Psalidopoulos, 223 – 35. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  10. Hansen, N. M. 1964. “Weber and Veblen on Economic Development.” Kyklos 17 (3): 447 – 68.  Google Scholar
  11. He, R. 2016. “On Max Weber’s Inaugural Address of 1895: Contextual, Textual and Intertextual Perspectives.” Sociological Studies 31 (6): 214 – 36.  Google Scholar
  12. Hedoin, C. 2009. “Weber and Veblen on the Rationalization Process.” Journal of Economic Issues 43 (1): 167 – 87.  Google Scholar
  13. Kolev, S. 2018. “Early Economic Sociology and Contextual Economics: The Weber-Wieser Connection.” Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 138 (1): 1 – 30.  Google Scholar
  14. Koslowski, P. 1997. Methodology of the Social Sciences, Ethics, and Economics in the Newer Historical School: From Max Weber und Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker. Berlin: Springer.  Google Scholar
  15. Lachmann, L. M. 1970. The Legacy of Max Weber. London: Heinemann.  Google Scholar
  16. Lepsius, M. R. and W. J. Mommsen. 1994. “Stoffverteilungsplan für das Handbuch der politischen Ökonomie.” In Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, Vol. II/6: Briefe 1909 – 1910, edited by M. R. Lepsius and W. J. Mommsen, 766 – 74. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).  Google Scholar
  17. Lestition, S. 2000. “Historical Preface to Max Weber, ‘Stock and Commodity Exchanges’.” Theory and Society 29 (3): 289 – 304.  Google Scholar
  18. Maas, H. 2009. “Disciplining Boundaries: Lionel Robbins, Max Weber, and the Borderlands of Economics, History, and Psychology.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 31 (4): 500 – 17.  Google Scholar
  19. Macdonald, R. 1965. “Schumpeter and Max Weber: Central Visions and Social Theories.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 79 (3): 373 – 96.  Google Scholar
  20. Maclachlan, F. 2017. “Max Weber within the Methodenstreit.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (4): 1161 – 75.  Google Scholar
  21. Mommsen, W. J. 1993. “Editorischer Bericht.” In Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, Vol. I/4,2, Landarbeiterfrage, Nationalstaat und Volkswirtschaftspolitik. Schriften und Reden 1892 – 1899, edited by W. J. Mommsen, 535 – 42. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).  Google Scholar
  22. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  23. Parsons, T. 1928 – 1929. “‘Capitalism’ in Recent German Literature – Sombart and Weber.” Journal of Political Economy 36 (6): 641 – 61 (Part I) and 37 (1): 31 – 51 (Part II).  Google Scholar
  24. Peukert, H. 2004. “Max Weber: Precursor of Economic Sociology and Heterodox Economics?” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63 (5): 987 – 1020.  Google Scholar
  25. Radkau, J. 2011. Max Weber: A Biography. Cambridge: Polity Press.  Google Scholar
  26. Ringer, F. K. 2004. Max Weber: An Intellectual Biography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Robbins, L. (1932) 1984. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  28. Russell, J. W. 1985. “Method, Analysis, and Politics in Max Weber.” History of Political Economy 17 (4): 575 – 90.  Google Scholar
  29. Schluchter, W. 1981. The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber’s Developmental History. Berkeley: University of California Press.  Google Scholar
  30. Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.  Google Scholar
  31. Schweitzer, A. 1970. “Typological Method in Economics: Max Weber’s Contribution.” History of Political Economy 2 (1): 66 – 96.  Google Scholar
  32. Smith, A. (1759) 1966. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. New York: Augustus Kelley Publishers.  Google Scholar
  33. Smith, A. (1776) 1952. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Encyclopedia Britannica.  Google Scholar
  34. Streissler, E. W. 1994. “The Influence of German and Austrian Economics on Joseph Schumpeter.” In Schumpeter in the History of Ideas, edited by Y. Shionoya and M. Perlman, 13 – 38. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.  Google Scholar
  35. Swedberg, R. 1998. Max Weber and the Idea of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  36. Tribe, K. 2006. “A Lost Connection: Max Weber and the Economic Sciences.” In Das Faszinosum Max Weber: Die Geschichte seiner Geltung, edited by K.-L. Ay and K. Borchardt, 313 – 29. Konstanz: UVK Verlag.  Google Scholar
  37. Vanagunas, S. 1989. “Max Weber’s Authority and the Theory of X-Inefficiency.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 48 (4): 393 – 400.  Google Scholar
  38. Weber, M. (1892) 1984. “Die Lage der Landarbeiter im ostelbischen Deutschland.” In Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, Vol. I/3,1, edited by M. Riesebrodt. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).  Google Scholar
  39. Weber, M. (1895) 1993. “Der Nationalstaat und die Volkswirtschaftspolitik, Akademische Antrittsrede.” In Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, Vol. I/4,2, edited by R. Aldenhoff and W. J. Mommsen, 543 – 74. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).  Google Scholar
  40. Weber, M. (1893 – 1898) 1999. “Börsenwesen, Schriften und Reden 1893 – 1898.” In Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, Vol. I/5,1, edited by K. Borchardt and C. Meyer-Stoll. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).  Google Scholar
  41. Weber, M. (1893 – 1898) 2000. “Börsenwesen, Schriften und Reden 1893 – 1898.” In Max Weber-Gesamtausgabe, Vol. I/5,2, edited by K. Borchardt and C. Meyer-Stoll. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).  Google Scholar
  42. Weber, M. (1898) 1990. Grundriss zu den Vorlesungen über allgemeine (“theoretische”) Nationalökonomie. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).  Google Scholar
  43. Weber, M. (1904 – 1905) 2007. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  44. Weber, M. (1908) 1975. “Marginal Utility Theory and the Fundamental Law of Psychophysics.” Social Science Quarterly 56 (1): 21 – 36.  Google Scholar
  45. Weber, M. (1920) 2016. Die Protestantische Ethik and der “Geist” des Kapitalismus. Mit einem Verzeichnis der wichtigsten Zusätze und Veränderungen aus der zweiten Fassung von 1920. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.  Google Scholar
  46. Weber, M. (1922) 1968. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. New York: Bedminster Press.  Google Scholar
  47. Weber, M. (1923) 1927. General Economic History. London: George Allen & Unwin.  Google Scholar
  48. Weber, M. 1936. Jugendbriefe. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).  Google Scholar
  49. Yagi, K. 2005. “Karl Knies, Austrians, and Max Weber: A Heidelberg Connection?” Journal of Economic Studies 32 (4): 314 – 30.  Google Scholar
  50. Zafirovski, M. Z. 2000. “Latent Theoretical Convergence upon a Pluralist Conception of Economic Action: Adam Smith and Max Weber.” Constitutional Political Economy 11 (2): 119 – 45.  Google Scholar

Abstract

This article presents Max Weber as an economist and as a social scientist. Weber’s relations to economics, philosophy and sociology are discussed. Max Weber has more in common with economists than it might seem at first sight. His principle of value neutrality has become the foundation of the methodology of social sciences, including economics. The second point shared by Max Weber with standard economics is methodological individualism. The third point which a modern economist can learn from Max Weber is the concept of the ideal type.