Menu Expand

Conversation with Deirdre McCloskey: Win-win-win-win … lose

DeMartino, George F. | McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 140 (2020), Iss. 3-4: pp. 367–385

Additional Information

Article Details

Pricing

Author Details

George F. DeMartino, Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, United States.

Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, Distinguished Professor Emerita of Economics and of History, Professor Emerita of English and of Communication, University of Illinois at Chicago, 720 S. Dearborn Street, Unit 206, Chicago, IL 60605, United States.

References

  1. Adler, M. D. and E. A. Posner. 1999. “Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Yale Law Journal 109 (2): 165 – 247.  Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G. 2007. “The Missing Motivation in Economics.” American Economic Review 97 (1): 5 – 36.  Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, J. M. and G. Tullock. (1962) 2004. The Calculus of Consent: The Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.  Google Scholar
  4. DeMartino, G. F. 2015. “Harming Irreparably: On Neoliberalism, Kaldor-Hicks, and the Paretian Guarantee.” Review of Social Economy 73 (4): 315 – 40.  Google Scholar
  5. DeMartino, G. F. 2016. “‘Econogenic Harm’: On the Nature of and Responsibility for the Harm Economists Do as They Try to Do Good.” In The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics, edited by G. F. DeMartino and D. N. McCloskey, 71 – 100. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  6. DeMartino, G. F. 2019. “Econogenic Harm and the Case for ‘Economy Harm Profile’ Analysis.” New Political Economy 24 (6): 798 – 815.  Google Scholar
  7. DeMartino, G. F. 2021. “The Specter of Irreparable Ignorance: Counterfactuals and Causality in Economics.” Review of Evolutionary Political Economy 2 (2): 253 – 76.  Google Scholar
  8. DeMartino, G. F. and D. N. McCloskey, eds. 2016. The Oxford Handbook of Professional Economic Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  9. Diamond, J. 2012. The World until Yesterday: What We Can Learn from Traditional Societies. New York: Penguin.  Google Scholar
  10. Frey, B. S., F. Oberholzer-Gee, and R. Eichenberger. 1996. “The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 104 (6): 1297 – 313.  Google Scholar
  11. Harberger, A. C. 1971. “Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics: An Interpretive Essay.” Journal of Economic Literature 9 (3): 785 – 97.  Google Scholar
  12. Hicks, J. R. 1941. “The Rehabilitation of Consumers’ Surplus.” Review of Economic Studies 8 (2): 108 – 16.  Google Scholar
  13. Hotelling, H. 1938. “The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of Railway and Utility Rates.” Econometrica 6 (3): 242 – 69.  Google Scholar
  14. LeGro, T. 2011. “Why the Sioux Are Refusing $1.3 Billion.” PBS News Hour: Public Broadcasting Service. August 24, 2014 Accessed October 02, 2021. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/arts/north_america-july-dec11-blackhills_08-23.  Google Scholar
  15. Leibenstein, H. 1965. “Long-run Welfare Criteria.” In The Public Economy of Urban Communities edited by J. Margolis, 39 – 51. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.  Google Scholar
  16. McCloskey, D. N. 1985. The Applied Theory of Price. New York: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  17. McCloskey, D. N. 2006. The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  18. McCloskey, D. N. 2010. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  19. McCloskey, D. N. 2012. “What Michael Sandel Can’t Buy: Review of Sandel’s What Money Can’t Buy.” Claremont Review of Books. 12 (4): 57 – 59 (a longer version “The Moral Limits of Communitarianism: What Michael Sandel Can’t Buy.” ORDO – Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 64: 538 – 43).  Google Scholar
  20. McCloskey, D. N. 2016. Bourgeois Equality: How Ideas, Not Capital or Institutions, Enriched the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  21. McCloskey, D. N. and S. Hejeebu. 1999. “The Reproving of Karl Polanyi.” Critical Review 13 (3 – 4): 285 – 314.  Google Scholar
  22. McCloskey, D. N. and S. Hejeebu. 2004. “Polanyi and the History of Capitalism: Rejoinder to Blyth.” Critical Review 16 (1): 135 – 42.  Google Scholar
  23. Mueller, J. E. 1999. Capitalism, Democracy, and Ralph’s Pretty Good Grocery. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  24. Musgrave, R. A. 1987. “Merit Goods.” In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, edited by J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Neuman, 452 – 3. London: Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  25. Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. “The Costs of Tragedy: Some Moral Limits to Cost-Benefit Analysis.” In Cost-Benefit Analysis: Legal, Economic, and Philosophical Perspectives, edited by M. D. Adler and E. A. Posner, 169 – 200. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.  Google Scholar
  26. Pemberton, S. A. 2015. Harmful Societies: Understanding Social Harm. Bristol: Policy Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Polinsky, M. A. 1972. “Probabilistic Compensation Criteria.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 86 (3): 407 – 25.  Google Scholar
  28. Posner, R. A. 1980. “The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication.” Hofstra Law Review 8 (3): 487 – 507.  Google Scholar
  29. Radest, H. B. 1997. “First, Do No Harm! Medical Ethics and Moral Education.” Humanism Today 11. Accessed October 2, 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20020109023341/http://www.humanismtoday.org/vol11/radest.html.  Google Scholar
  30. Rodrik, D. 2001. “The Global Governance of Trade – As If Development Really Mattered.” United Nations Development Programme: Background Paper.  Google Scholar
  31. Sandel, M. J. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.  Google Scholar
  32. Titmuss, R. M. 1971. The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin.  Google Scholar
  33. Tucker, J. A. 2017. Right-Wing Collectivism: The Other Threat to Liberty. Atlanta: Foundation for Economic Education.  Google Scholar
  34. White, M. D. 2006. “A Kantian Critique of Neoclassical Law and Economics.” Review of Political Economy 18 (2): 235 – 52.  Google Scholar
  35. Ziliak, S. T. and D. N. McCloskey. 2004. “Size Matters: The Standard Error of Regressions in the American Economics Review.” Journal of Socio-Economics 33 (5): 527 – 46.  Google Scholar
  36. Ziliak, S. T. and D. N. McCloskey. 2008. The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.  Google Scholar

Preview

Table of Contents

Section Title Page Action Price
George F. DeMartino/Deirdre Nansen McCloskey: Conversation with Deirdre McCloskey: Win-win-win-win … lose 1
On the Matter of Compensation Tests 2
The Abuse of Compensation Tests 5
Then Can We Agree to Excise Facile Compensation Tests from Economics? 1
Win, Win, Win … Lose – The Paretian Defense of Uncompensated Harms 1
The McCloskey Counterfactual 1
The Hegelian Challenge 1
References 1