Reviewing Property Rights to Meet Ecological Challenges
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Reviewing Property Rights to Meet Ecological Challenges
Jahrbuch Recht und Ethik, Vol. 29(2021), Iss. 1 : pp. 63–77
Additional Information
Article Details
Pricing
Author Details
Kment,Martin, Univ.-Prof. Dr., LL. M., Geschäftsführender Direktor des Instituts für Umweltrecht und Lehrstuhl für Öffentliches Recht und Europarecht, Umweltrecht und Planungsrecht, Universität Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 24, D-86159 Augsburg
Abstract
Reviewing Property Rights to Meet Ecological Challenges
The guarantee of ownership not only occupies an important position in the German constitution, the Basic Law, but also shapes the constitutional foundations of neighboring European countries and many other legal systems on the world. In addition to the preservation of concrete ownership positions, the property guarantee primarily ensures the freedom of freedom of the individual, which in the property finds the material securing of his self -determination. However, ownership is not only in the service of the owner; It should also serve the common good. In this change, conflicts arise and it is increasingly solidifying if the use of property is violated by ecological common good interests, for example in the destruction of environmental goods or the (excessive) consumption of environmental resources. This speaks for a realignment of understanding of property and its relationship with socio-ecological necessities, whereby this must be based on the current ecological challenges for the company (s)-worldwide: The share of rights, which is anchored in the property, must be brought back to balance with the social and ecological responsibilities. There are socio-historical, but also constitutionally promising starting points; A current judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court on climate protection points in the same direction.
Table of Contents
Section Title | Page | Action | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Martin Kment, Reviewing Property Rights to Meet Ecological Challenges | 63 | ||
I. Meaning and function of property | 63 | ||
1. Property for people | 63 | ||
2. Property in German constitutional law | 64 | ||
a) Property as guarantee of freedom, and other functions | 64 | ||
b) Limitations | 66 | ||
3. Property in other constitutions | 66 | ||
a) European constitutions | 66 | ||
b) United States, Russia, and India | 68 | ||
c) Interim result | 68 | ||
II. Conflicts between property and ecological matters | 68 | ||
III. Consideration of ecological matters in the interpretation of property | 69 | ||
1. Shaping of private property with reservations for the common good | 69 | ||
a) Private ownership of nature | 69 | ||
b) Fundamentals of private property | 70 | ||
c) Common good | 71 | ||
2. Duties according to art. 14 para. 2 Basic Law: social and ecological liability | 63 | ||
3. Strengthening the ecological impact on the constitutional level | 63 | ||
4. New decision of the Federal Constitutional Court: strong impact of the climate protection on civil rights and liberties including art. 14 Basic Law | 63 | ||
IV. Conclusion | 63 | ||
Zusammenfassung | 63 |