Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Herrmann-Pillath, C., Bau Macedo, L. Narratives and Economic Policy: Theoretical Explorations and the Case of Central Bank Communication in Brazil. Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, 141(3), 243-272. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.3.243
Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten and Bau Macedo, Luís Otávio "Narratives and Economic Policy: Theoretical Explorations and the Case of Central Bank Communication in Brazil" Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 141.3, 2021, 243-272. https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.3.243
Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten/Bau Macedo, Luís Otávio (2021): Narratives and Economic Policy: Theoretical Explorations and the Case of Central Bank Communication in Brazil, in: Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, vol. 141, iss. 3, 243-272, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.141.3.243

Format

Narratives and Economic Policy: Theoretical Explorations and the Case of Central Bank Communication in Brazil

Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten | Bau Macedo, Luís Otávio

Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 141 (2021), Iss. 3 : pp. 243–272

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Carsten Herrmann-Pillath, Max Weber Centre for Advanced Cultural and Social Studies, University of Erfurt, Steinplatz 2, 99085 Erfurt, Germany.

Luís Otávio Bau Macedo, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Av. dos Estudantes, nº 5055, Cidade Universitária, Rondonópolis – MT, 78736 – 900, Brazil.

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A. and R. J. Shiller. 2009. Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, F. and L. G. de Paula. 2019. “The Place of Uncertainty in Heterodox Economics Journals: A Bibliometric Study.” Journal of Economic Issues 53 (2): 553 – 62.  Google Scholar
  3. Amann, E. and A. Barrientos. 2014. Is There a New Brazilian Model of Development? Main Findings from the IRIBA Research Programme. IRIBA Working Paper Series No. 13. The University of Manchester, Global Development Institute.  Google Scholar
  4. Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.  Google Scholar
  5. Banco Central do Brasil. 2015 – 2016. “Atas do Comitê de Política Monetária – Copom.” Accessed March 4, 2020. https://www.bcb.gov.br/publicacoes/atascopom.  Google Scholar
  6. Banco Central do Brasil. 2019. “Consumer Confidence Index: Federation of Commerce of Goods, Services, and Tourism of São Paulo.” Accessed May 10, 2019. https://dadosabertos.bcb.gov.br/dataset/4393-indice-de-confianca-do-consumidor.  Google Scholar
  7. Beckert, J. 2016. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.  Google Scholar
  8. Blinder, A. S., M. Ehrmann, M. Fratzscher, J. De Haan, and D.-J. Jansen. 2008. “Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy: A Survey of Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (4): 910 – 45.  Google Scholar
  9. Blyth, M. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press  Google Scholar
  10. Blyth, M. 2011. “Ideas, Uncertainty, and Evolution.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Béland and R. H. Cox, 83 – 103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  11. Calomiris, C. W. and S. H. Haber. 2015. Fragile by Design: The Political Origins of Banking Crises and Scarce Credit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  12. Carvalho, L. 2018. A valsa brasileira: do boom ao caos econômico. São Paulo: Editora Todavia.  Google Scholar
  13. Codato, A., M. Cavalieri, R. Perissinotto, and E. G. Dantas. 2016. “Economic Mainstream and Power: A Profile Analysis of Central Bank Directors during PSDB and PT Governments in Brazil.” Nova Economia 26 (3): 687 – 720.  Google Scholar
  14. Dauvergne, P. and D. BL. Farias. 2012. “The Rise of Brazil as a Global Development Power.” Third World Quarterly 33 (5): 903 – 17.  Google Scholar
  15. Davis, J. B. 2010. Individuals and Identity in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  16. De Haan, J. and J.-E. Sturm. 2019. “Central Bank Communication: How to Manage Expectations?” In The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Central Banking, edited by D. G. Mayes, P. L. Siklos, and J.-E. Sturm, 231 – 62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  17. Dequech, D. 2018. “Applying the Concept of Mainstream Economics outside the United States: General Remarks and the Case of Brazil as an Example of the Institutionalization of Pluralism.” Journal of Economic Issues 52 (4): 904 – 24.  Google Scholar
  18. Fernandez, R. G. and C. E. Suprinyak. 2019. “Manufacturing Pluralism in Brazilian Economics.” Journal of Economic Issues 53 (3): 748 – 73.  Google Scholar
  19. Freitas, C., B. Freitas, and D. Santos. 2016. “Quem disse? Reported speech in Portuguese.” Accessed June 16, 2021. http://comum.rcaap.pt/bitstream/10400.26/20566/1/FreitasetalLREC2016.pdf.  Google Scholar
  20. G1 Globo. 2014. “Entenda quais são os entraves ao crescimento da economia brasileira.” Accessed October 29, 2019. http://g1.globo.com/economia/noticia/2014/08/entenda-quais-sao-os-entraves-ao-crescimento-da-economia-brasileira.html.  Google Scholar
  21. G1 Globo. 2015. “Novo vilão do PIB, investimento completa sete trimestres de queda.” Accessed May 25, 2019. http://g1.globo.com/economia/noticia/2015/05/novo-vilao-do-pib-investimento-completa-sete-trimestres-de-queda.html.  Google Scholar
  22. Gentzkow, M., B. Kelly, and M. Taddy. 2019. “Text as Data.” Journal of Economic Literature 57 (3): 535 – 74.  Google Scholar
  23. Green, M. 2017. “Speech Acts.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/speech-acts/.  Google Scholar
  24. Haas, P. M. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1): 1 – 35.  Google Scholar
  25. Hannan, M. T., L. Pólos, and G. R. Carroll, eds. 2007. Logics of Organization Theory: Audiences, Codes, and Ecologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  26. Hay, C. 2011. “Ideas and the Construction of Interests.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Béland and R. H. Cox, 65 – 82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  Google Scholar
  27. Herman, D., M. Jahn, and M.-L. Ryan, eds. 2005. Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  28. Herrmann-Pillath, C. 2007. “Deliberative Trade Policy.” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 3 (2): 209 – 38.  Google Scholar
  29. Herrmann-Pillath, C. 2012. “Institutions, Distributed Cognition and Agency: Rule-following as Performative Action.” Journal of Economic Methodology 19 (1): 21 – 42  Google Scholar
  30. Herrmann-Pillath, C. 2013. “Performativity of Economic Systems: Approach and Implications for Taxonomy.” Journal of Economic Methodology 20 (2): 139 – 63.  Google Scholar
  31. Hsu, G. and M. T. Hannan. 2005. “Identities, Genres, and Organizational Forms.” Organization Science 16 (5): 474 – 90.  Google Scholar
  32. Hurrell, A. 2010. “Brazil and the New Global Order.” Current History 109 (724): 60 – 6.  Google Scholar
  33. Infomoney. 2016. “Há risco do Brasil se tornar a Grécia da América Latina, diz vice-presidente do Itaú.” Accessed June 9, 2019. https://www.infomoney.com.br/mercados/acoes-e-indices/noticia/4536255/risco-brasil-tornar-grecia-america-latina-diz-vice-presidente-itau.  Google Scholar
  34. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA). 2019. “Ipeadata.” Accessed May 18, 2019. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/Default.aspx.  Google Scholar
  35. Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.  Google Scholar
  36. Keynes, J. M. (1936) 1960. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Palgrave Macmillan.  Google Scholar
  37. Klamer, A., D. N. McCloskey, and R. M. Solow, eds. 1989. The Consequences of Economic Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  38. Kliesen, K. L., B. Levine, and C. J. Waller. 2019. “Gauging Market Responses to Monetary Policy Communication.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 101 (2): 69 – 91.  Google Scholar
  39. Lycan, W. G. 1999. Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction. London: Routledge.  Google Scholar
  40. MacKenzie, D. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge: MIT Press.  Google Scholar
  41. Mercier, H. and D. Sperber. 2018. The Enigma of Reason: A New Theory of Human Understanding. London: Penguin Books.  Google Scholar
  42. North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  43. Portugal, M. 2018. “Inovação e Competição: Novos Caminhos para Redução dos Spreads Bancários?” Accessed on April 20, 2020. https://portal.febraban.org.br/pagina/3141/26/pt-br/apresentacoes-setor-bancario.  Google Scholar
  44. Searle, J. R. 1976. “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1 – 23.  Google Scholar
  45. Searle, J. R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.  Google Scholar
  46. Schneider, B. R. 2015. “The Developmental State in Brazil: Comparative and Historical Perspectives.” Revista de Economia Política 35 (1): 114 – 32.  Google Scholar
  47. Shackle, G. L. S. 1972. Epistemics & Economics: A Critique of Economic Doctrines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  48. Shapiro, A. H., M. Sudhof, and D. J. Wilson. 2018. “Measuring News Sentiment.” Accessed June 15, 2021. https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/files/wp2017-01.pdf.  Google Scholar
  49. Shiller, R. J. 2017. “Narrative Economics.” American Economic Review 107 (4): 967 – 1004.  Google Scholar
  50. Shiller, R. J. 2019. Narrative Economics: How Stories Go Viral and Drive Major Economic Events. Princeton: Princeton University Press.  Google Scholar
  51. Souma, W., I. Vodenska, and H. Aoyama. 2019. “Enhanced News Sentiment Analysis using Deep Learning Methods.” Journal of Computational Social Science 2 (1): 33 – 46.  Google Scholar
  52. Sweig, J. E. 2010. “A New Global Player: Brazil’s Far-Flung Agenda.” Foreign Affairs 89 (6): 73 – 84.  Google Scholar
  53. UOL. 2015. “Dólar pode chegar a R$ 4,50, dizem analistas; veja dicas sobre o que fazer.” Accessed May 26, 2019. https://economia.uol.com.br/financas-pessoais/noticias/redacao/2015/09/21/dolar-pode-chegar-a-r-450-dizem-analistas-veja-dicas-sobre-o-que-fazer.htm?cmpid=copiaecolahttps://economia.uol.com.br/financas-pessoais/noticias/redacao/2015/09/21/dolar-pode-chegar-a-r-450-dizem-analistas-veja-dicas-sobre-o-que-fazer.htm.  Google Scholar
  54. UOL. 2016. “Economistas dão cinco passos para o Brasil sair da crise econômica.” Accessed June 2, 2019. https://economia.uol.com.br/noticias/bloomberg/2016/03/02/cinco-passos-para-o-brasil-escapar-do-desastre.htm.  Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, R. A. and L. Foglia. 2017. “Embodied Cognition.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. Accessed June 16, 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/embodied-cognition/.  Google Scholar
  56. Woodford, M. 2005. Central Bank Communication and Policy Effectiveness. NBER Working Paper No. 11898. Accessed July 15, 2021. https://www.nber.org/papers/w1189.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Increasingly, economists study narratives and their causal impact on economic processes. This paper proposes a new theoretical framework of narrative analysis that is based on the philosophy of language, especially speech act theory, motivated by the observation that, so far, the economic approaches focus on the representational function of narratives and tend to emphasize negative consequences of biased, distorted, and simplified representation. In contrast, we define narratives as a medium of distributed cognition and mediators of collective agency in networks of agents operating in an uncertain and complex world that is materially constituted by their actions. After sketching the theory, we introduce a case study on the role of central bank communication in recent economic developments in Brazil for illustrative purposes, focusing on the role of financial audiences and a specific narrative genre, the “austerity genre” induced by the Brazilian Central Bank.