Menu Expand

Verfügbarkeitsheuristiken, Kompetenzeffekte und Renditeerwartungen von Rüstungsaktien während des Irak-Kriegs

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Kleidt, B., Mayer-Fiedrich, M., Schiereck, D. Verfügbarkeitsheuristiken, Kompetenzeffekte und Renditeerwartungen von Rüstungsaktien während des Irak-Kriegs. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 39(1), 43-74. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.39.1.43
Kleidt, Benjamin; Mayer-Fiedrich, Matija D. and Schiereck, Dirk "Verfügbarkeitsheuristiken, Kompetenzeffekte und Renditeerwartungen von Rüstungsaktien während des Irak-Kriegs" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 39.1, 2006, 43-74. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.39.1.43
Kleidt, Benjamin/Mayer-Fiedrich, Matija D./Schiereck, Dirk (2006): Verfügbarkeitsheuristiken, Kompetenzeffekte und Renditeerwartungen von Rüstungsaktien während des Irak-Kriegs, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 39, iss. 1, 43-74, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.39.1.43

Format

Verfügbarkeitsheuristiken, Kompetenzeffekte und Renditeerwartungen von Rüstungsaktien während des Irak-Kriegs

Kleidt, Benjamin | Mayer-Fiedrich, Matija D. | Schiereck, Dirk

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 39 (2006), Iss. 1 : pp. 43–74

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Benjamin Kleidt, Oestrich-Winkel

Matija D. Mayer-Fiedrich, Hamburg

Dirk Schiereck, Oestrich-Winkel

References

  1. Barber, Brad/Odeon, Terrance (2000): Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors. Journal of Finance, 55, 773-806.  Google Scholar
  2. Barber, Brad/Odeon, Terrance (2001): Boys will Be Boys: Gender, Overconfidence, and Common Stock Investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 261-292.  Google Scholar
  3. Benartzi, Shlomo (2001): Excessive Extrapolation and the Allocation of 401(k) Accounts to Company Stocks. Journal of Finance, 56, 1747-1764.  Google Scholar
  4. Brennan, Michael/Cao, Henry (1997): International Portfolio Investment Flows. Journal of Finance, 52, 1851-1880.  Google Scholar
  5. Bugar, Gyöngyi/Maurer, Raimond (1999): Performance of International Portfolio Diversification Strategies: The Viewpoint of German and Hungarian Investors. Kredit und Kapital, 32, 581-609.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Heuristic Approaches to Availability, Competence Effects and Return Expectations in Respect of Defence-Industry Shares during the Iraqi War

Overall, the structures of private-investor depots show substantial diversification deficits so that - within the meaning of the portfolio theory - exclusively inefficient risk/return combinations have been realised. Whilst - for purposes of international diversification - such deficits have been referred to as "home bias" and been rather intensively analysed already, the knowledge of the kind of domestic shares included in private-investor portfolios and of the reasons pertaining to the choice of such shares has been rather poor so far. The thesis that "familiarity breeds investment" is known from the field of behavioural finance. This thesis suggests that investors mainly choose shares for which information is readily available to them and/or shares of companies domiciled in the regions in which they live.

This explanation may seem to be intuitively plausible, but it fails to show any connection with the portfolio theory. This is the point where our analysis starts, arguing that availability of information results in a stronger competence feeling and that the so perceived competence translates into systematically distorted estimations of the yield spread parameters of shares. The present analysis examines this competence effect for German and US defence-industry shares. In December 2000 and March 2003 private investors and young officers of the German armed forces (Bundeswehr) were asked about their individual return expectations for such shares.

The main results of this study are that the reasons derived from behavioural finance to explain the competence effect are relevant in various respects also in this case. However, it has turned out that officers familiar with defence goods do not feel to be more competent for evaluating defence-industry shares.