JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Firm Size Matters – An Analysis of Size Effects on Investment Using Firm-level Panel Data
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 39 (2006), Iss. 1 : pp. 97–116
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Andreas Behr, Münster
References
-
Abel, Andrew B./Blanchard, Olivier J. (1986): The Present Value of Profits and Cyclical Movements in Investment, Econometrica 54, March, p. 249-274.
Google Scholar -
Audretsch, David B./Elston, Julie A. (2002): Does firm size matter? Evidence on the impact of liquidity constraints on firm investment behaviour in Germany, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 20, No. 1, p. 1-17.
Google Scholar -
Behr, Andreas/Bellgardt, Egon (1998): Sektorale Investitionsentwicklung und Liquiditätseinfluss, Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 31, p. 28-62.
Google Scholar -
Behr, Andreas/Bellgardt, Egon (2000): Investitionsverhalten und Liquiditätsrestringiertheit, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Vol. 220, No. 3, p. 257-283.
Google Scholar -
Behr, Andreas/Bellgardt, Egon (2002): Dynamic Q-investment functions for Germany using panel balance sheet data and a new algorithm for the capital stock at replacement values, Discussion paper, 23/02, Deutsche Bundesbank.
Google Scholar
Abstract
We analyse the effect of firm size on the investment behaviour of German firms within the framework of the Q-theory. Our database contains 2,314 firms covering the time period 1987 to 1998. Descriptive evidence shows small firms to reveal the highest investment ratios. Estimating dynamic Q-investment functions we find very strong negative effects of firm size on investment. The strong negative effect is prevailing even within subgroups of firms based on sector and size. The evidence on the role of cash flow is week. Especially small firms seem unaffected by cash flow, after controlling for investment opportunities via Q. (JEL E22, G32, L00)