Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Is Bank Capital Procyclical? A Cross-Country Analysis
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 40 (2007), Iss. 2 : pp. 225–264
2 Citations (CrossRef)
Ayuso, J., D. Pérez, J. Saurina (2004): Are capital buffers pro-cyclical? Evidence from Spanish panel data. Journal of Financial Intermediation 13, 249-264.
BCBS (2004): Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: a Revised Framework, Basel Committee Publications No. 107, June (www.bis.org).
Berger, A. N., G. F. Udell (1994): Do risk-based capital allocate bank credit and cause a credit crunch in the United States?, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 26, 585-628.
Berger, A. N., R. J. Herring, G. P. Szegö (1995): The role of capital in financial institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance 19, 393-430.
Bikker, J. A., H. Hu (2002): Cyclical patterns in profits, provisioning and lending of banks and procyclicality of the new Basel capital requirements, Banca Nazionale del Lavaro Quarterly Review 55, 143-175 (see also: www.dnb.nl).
This article investigates the determinants of commercial banks' own internal capital targets and potential sensitivity of these levels to the business cycle. Worldwide results make clear that banks' own risk is only slightly dependent on the business cycle. Banks tend to hold substantial capital buffers on top of minimum requirements, reflecting that they hold capital for other reasons than strictly meeting the capital requirements. These results suggest that actual capital levels may not become substantially more procyclical under the new risk-sensitive Basel II regime. However, a number of banks, especially smaller ones, combine a relatively risky portfolio with limited buffer capital. A more risk-sensitive capital regulation regime could force these banks to obtain higher capital levels, which would make them more procyclical. (JEL E32, G21, G28, G31)