JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
The Implied Equity Risk Premium - An Evaluation of Empirical Methods
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 40 (2007), Iss. 4 : pp. 583–613
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
David Schröder, Bonn
References
-
Blanchard, Olivier J. (1993): 'Movements in the equity premium', Brookings Paper on Economic Activity (2), 75-138.
Google Scholar -
Bodnar, Gordon M., Dumas, Bernard and Marston, Richard C. (2003): Cross-border valuation: The international cost of equity capital. NBER Working Paper 10115, www.nber.org.
Google Scholar -
Claus, James and Thomas, Jacob (2001): 'Equity premia as low as three percent? evidence from analysts' earnings forecasts for domestic and international stock markets', Journal of Finance 56(5), 1629-1666.
Google Scholar -
Consensus Economics Inc. (2002): Consensus Forecasts - A Digest of International Economic Forecasts, Consensus Economics Inc., London.
Google Scholar -
Copeland, Tom, Koller, Tim and Murrin, Jack (2000): Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies, 3rd edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Google Scholar
Abstract
A new approach of estimating a forward-looking equity risk premium (ERP) is to calculate an implied risk premium using present value (PV) formulas. This paper compares implied risk premia obtained from different PV models and evaluates them by analyzing their underlying firm-specific cost-of-capital estimates. It is shown that specific versions of dividend discount models (DDM) and residual income models (RIM) lead to similar ERP estimates. However, cross-sectional regression tests of individual firm risk suggest that there are qualitative differences between both approaches. Expected firm risk obtained from the DDM is more in line with standard asset pricing models and performs better in predicting future stock returns than estimates from the RIM. (JEL G12)