Strategie Lessons from the Maastricht Criteria
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Strategie Lessons from the Maastricht Criteria
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 33 (2000), Iss. 4 : pp. 455–467
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Friedrich Heinemann, Mannheim
References
-
Alesina, Alberto/Drazen, Allen (1991): Why Are Stabilizations Delayed?, American Economic Review. 81: 1170-1188.
Google Scholar -
Alesina, Alberto/Perotti, Roberto (1996): Budget Deficits and Budget Institutions, Working Paper No. 5556. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Google Scholar -
Buiter, Willem H./Corsetti, Giancarlo/Roubini, Nouriel (1993): ‘Excessive Deficits’: Sense and Nonsense in the Treaty of Maastricht, Economic Policy. 16: 57-100.
Google Scholar -
Keesing’s Record of World Events (various years): Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Google Scholar -
International Monetary Fund (1998): World Economic Outlook May 1998. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Google Scholar -
Lane, Jan-Erik/McKay, David/Newton, Kenneth (1997): Political Data Handbook OECD Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar -
McKay, Julie E. (1997): Evaluating the EMU Criteria: Theoretical Constructs, Member Compliance and Empirical Testing, Kyklos. 50: 63-82.
Google Scholar -
McMillan, John (1992): Games, Strategies and Managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar -
Mueller, Dennis C. (1989): Public Choice II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar -
Rotte, Ralph/Zimmermann, Klaus F. (1998): Fiscal Restraint and the Political Economy of EMU, Public Choice. 94: 385-404.
Google Scholar -
Schelling, Thomas (1960): The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Abstract
The fiscal criteria of the Maastricht Treaty have been heavily criticised in the economic analysis. Some of this criticism might be based on a too narrow economic approach that neglects the strategic function of the criteria. This study sheds light on this neglected dimension and proposes to understand the criteria in the context of bargaining theory as boundaries. According to bargaining theory a boundary is created in order to change bargaining equilibria. It is argued that this was probably the main purpose of the criteria: By making the EMU entry conditional on fiscal improvement it was possible to change fiscal policy equilibria. In a simple negotiation model of the relationship between the EU council and the median voter of an EU member country the conditions for the strategic effectiveness of this kind of conditionality are demonstrated. The empirical findings support the theoretical predictions by showing that the criteria were particularly effective in countries with a high rate of Euro acceptance. This leads to the expectation that consolidation will slow down in these countries in the years following EMU’s start. (JEL H87, F33, C78, D72).