Europäische Währungsunion
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Europäische Währungsunion
- institutionenökonomisch gesehen —
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 32 (1999), Iss. 2 : pp. 159–191
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Rudolf Richter, Saarbrücken
References
-
Aktionsgemeinschaft EURO (1997): Ratgeber EURO. Die 25 wichtigsten Fragen und Antworten zum neuen Geld, 1997, K.Löffler (Hrsg.), Europäisches Parlament, Informationsbüro für Deutschland, Bonn-Center, Bundeskanzlerplatz, 53113 Bonn.
Google Scholar -
Backus, D. und Drifill, J. (1985): „Inflation and Reputation,“ American Economic Review, 75, 530 - 38.
Google Scholar -
Barro, R. J. und Gordon, D. B. (1983): „Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy,“ Journal of Monetary Economics, 12, 101 - 121.
Google Scholar -
Bindseil, U. (1996): „A Coalition-Form Analysis of the Allocation of Voting Rights in the Council of the European Central Bank," Arbeitsstelle für Neue Institutionenökonomik, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.
Google Scholar -
Blackburn, K. und Christensen, M. (1987): „Macroeconomic Policy Games and Reputational Equilibria in a Contracting Model," Ricerche Economiche, 41, 190 - 209.
Google Scholar
Abstract
European Monetary Union
Under the Aspect of Institutional Economics
This contribution begins with a brief summary of the situation that existed prior to the decision to set up the European Monetary Union (EMU), i.e. with a description of the problems that confronted the European Monetary System (EMS) set up in 1979 which soon turned out to be in need of repair. It is shown that EMU was neither the only nor the best repair option for the EMS. Thereafter the discussion focuses on problems posed by the 1992 Maastricht Treaty; the main topics of the debate on the euro are briefly presented. This contribution closes with an outlook on the EMU. Two extreme ways of looking at it are presented: an optimistic and a pessimistic one. Both ought to be viewed as fixed points in a continuously developing scenario potentially helping to improve the capability of assessing the EMU development to be expected and of evaluating subsequent results more clearly.