Internal Finance versus Bank Debt: The Gains from Establishing a Debt History
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Internal Finance versus Bank Debt: The Gains from Establishing a Debt History
Bester, Helmut | Scheepens, Joris P. J. F.
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 29(1996), Iss. 4 : pp. 565–591 | First published online: December 13, 2022
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Helmut Bester, Berlin and Amsterdam
Joris P. J. F. Scheepens, Berlin and Amsterdam
References
-
Ang, J. S. and Jung, M., 1993: An alternate test of Myers’ pecking order theory of capital structure: the case of South Korean firms, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 1, 31-46.
Google Scholar -
Baumol, William J., 1952: The transactions demand for cash: An inventory theoretic approach, Quarterly Journal of Economics 66, 545-56.
Google Scholar -
Berger, Allen N. and Udell, Gregory F., 1994: Lines of credit and relationship lending in small firm finance, mimeo.
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper considers a two-period model in which a firm needs outside financing in period 2. If a firm establishes a reputation with a bank already in the first period, it may reduce the cost and increase the availability of bank debt in the second period. To establish such a reputation, the firm must induce the bank to monitor in period 1. Bank monitoring effort is non-contractible, so the firm induces the bank to monitor by taking an unsecured bank loan. In period 1 a bank loan may then be preferable to internal finance. This contrasts with a result by Myers and Majluf (1984) where firms always prefer to finance profitable investments internally.