Der Einfluß des Nicht-Bankensektors auf das volkswirtschaftliche Geldangebot
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Der Einfluß des Nicht-Bankensektors auf das volkswirtschaftliche Geldangebot
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 26 (1993), Iss. 2 : pp. 193–204
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Manfred Neldner, Osnabrück
References
-
Cagan, Ph. [1958]: The Demand for Currency Relative to the Total Money Supply, in: The Journal of Political Economy, 66, S. 303 - 327.
Google Scholar -
Neldner, M. [1976]: Die Bestimmungsgründe des volkswirtschaftlichen Geldangebots, Berlin, New York.
Google Scholar -
Neldner, M. [1977]: The Determinants of the Currency Ratio, the Time Deposit Ratio, and the Savings Deposit Ratio: An Econometric Analysis for the West-German Economy, in: Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 113, S. 667 - 692.
Google Scholar -
Schilcher, R. [1973]: Geldfunktionen und Buchgeldschöpfung. Ein Beitrag zur Geldtheorie, 2. Aufl., Berlin.
Google Scholar -
Tinbergen, J. [1939]: Statistical Testing of Business Cycle Theories II: Business Cycles in the United States of America 1919 - 1932, Geneva.
Google Scholar
Abstract
The Portfolio-Behavior of the Non-Banking Public and the Total Money Supply
If reserve ratios are given, the value of the money multiplier critically depends on how the public wants to divide its money holdings between the various components of the total money supply. As the regression equations presented above indicate, these portfolio decisions mainly hinge on variables like relative prices, market interest rates, real wealth, and real income. The domestic money supply, therefore, not only varies in response to changes in the volume of base money or toa shift in the minimum reserve requirements set by the central bank, but it is also positively correlated with movements in real wealth and inversely correlated with movements in real income or in the level of market interest rates. Its reaction to changes in relative prices, however, cannot be predicted precisely, because in this case there are two effects pointing into opposite directions either of which may dominate