Menu Expand

Allokations- und Wohlfahrtseffekte der Besteuerung: Die Vorschläge zur Reform der Unternehmensbesteuerung

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Conrad, K. Allokations- und Wohlfahrtseffekte der Besteuerung: Die Vorschläge zur Reform der Unternehmensbesteuerung. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 25(3), 359-385. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.25.3.359
Conrad, Klaus "Allokations- und Wohlfahrtseffekte der Besteuerung: Die Vorschläge zur Reform der Unternehmensbesteuerung" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 25.3, 1992, 359-385. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.25.3.359
Conrad, Klaus (1992): Allokations- und Wohlfahrtseffekte der Besteuerung: Die Vorschläge zur Reform der Unternehmensbesteuerung, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 25, iss. 3, 359-385, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.25.3.359

Format

Allokations- und Wohlfahrtseffekte der Besteuerung: Die Vorschläge zur Reform der Unternehmensbesteuerung

Conrad, Klaus

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 25 (1992), Iss. 3 : pp. 359–385

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Klaus Conrad, Mannheim

References

  1. Chamley, C.: The Welfare Cost of Capital Income Taxation in a Growing Economy. Journal of Political Economy 89, Nr. 3, Juni, 468 - 96, 1981.  Google Scholar
  2. Conrad, K. und Jorgenson, D. W.: Measuring Performance in the Private Economy of the Federal Republic of Germany 1950 - 1973. Tübingen, 1975.  Google Scholar
  3. Conrad, K.: Intertemporal General Equilibrium Modeling of German Tax Reform Proposals, Finanzarchiv 48, 194 - 221, 1990.  Google Scholar
  4. Duschek, K., Farken, T. und Rose, M.: Welfare Effects of Abolishing the German Business Tax - An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis. Heidelberger Diskussion Paper, Nr. 160, Dez. 1990.  Google Scholar
  5. Gottfried, P. und Wiegard, W.: Exemption versus Zero Rating: A Hidden Problem of VAT. Regensburger Diskussionsbeiträge zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Nr. 219, 1990.  Google Scholar
  6. Hall, R. E.: The Dynamic Effects of Fiscal Policy in an Economy with Foresight. Review of Economic Studies 38, Nr. 2, April, 229 - 244, 1971.  Google Scholar
  7. Hall, R. E. und Jorgenson, D. W.: Tax Policy and Investment Behavior. American Economic Review 57, Nr. 3, Juni, 391 - 414, 1967.  Google Scholar
  8. Harberger, A. C.: The Incidence of the Corporation Tax. Journal of Political Economy 70, Nr. 3, Juni, 215 - 240, 1962.  Google Scholar
  9. Harberger, A. C.: Efficiency Effects of Taxes on Income from Capital. In: Krzyzaniak, M. (ed.): Effects of Corporation Income Tax. Detroit, Wayne State Univ. Press, 1966.  Google Scholar
  10. Hirte, G. und Wiegard, W.: An Introduction to Applied General Equilibrium Tax Modelling, in: Bös, D. et al. (ed.), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics, Berlin -  Google Scholar
  11. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 1988.  Google Scholar
  12. Jorgenson, D. W.: Capital Theory and Investment Behavior. American Economic Review 53, Nr. 2, Mai, 247 - 259, 1963.  Google Scholar
  13. Jorgenson, D. W.: Modeling Production for General Equilibrium Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 85, 2, 101 - 112, 1983.  Google Scholar
  14. Jorgenson, D. W. und Yun, K.-Y.: The Efficiency of Capital Allocation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88, Nr. 1, 1986a.  Google Scholar
  15. Jorgenson, D. W. und Yun, K.-Y.: Tax Policy and Capital Allocation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88, Nr. 2, 355 - 377, 1986b.  Google Scholar
  16. Jorgenson, D. W. und Yun, K.-Y.: Tax Reform and the Cost of Capital. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1991. - Jorgenson, D.W. und Yun, K.-Y.: Tax Reform and U.S. Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 151 - 193, 1990 a.  Google Scholar
  17. Jorgenson, D. W. und Yun, K.-Y.: The Excess Burden of Taxation in the U.S. HIER Discussion Paper Nr. 1528, 1990b.  Google Scholar
  18. King, M. A. und Fullerton, D.: The Taxation of Income from Capital. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1984.  Google Scholar
  19. Kühn, B., Kungl, H., Rose, M.: Incidence Effects of Changing the German Income Tax Rate Schedule. In: Bös, D., Rose, M., Seidl, Ch. (eds.), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics. Berlin - Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, 1988, 205 - 246.  Google Scholar
  20. Leibfritz, W.: Steuerliche Belastung und staatliche Förderung der Kapitalbildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ifo-Studien zur Finanzpolitik, Nr. 36, 1986.  Google Scholar
  21. Leibfritz, W.: Taxation of Capital Income in the Federal Republic of Germany. Paper presented to the International Conference on the Cost of Capital at the Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Nov. 1987.  Google Scholar
  22. Sinn, H.-W.: Capital Income Taxation, Depreciation Allowances and Economic Growth: A Perfect-foresight General Equilibrium Model, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 41, Nr. 3 - 4, 295 - 305, 1981.  Google Scholar
  23. Sinn, H.-W.: Kapitaleinkommensbesteuerung. Tübingen 1985. Revised as: Capital Income Taxa- tion and Resource Allocation. Amsterdam. 1987.  Google Scholar
  24. Turnovsky, S. J.: The Incidence of Taxes: A Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis, Journal of Public Economics 18, Nr. 2, July, 161 - 194, 1982.  Google Scholar
  25. Chamley, C.: The Welfare Cost of Capital Income Taxation in a Growing Economy. Journal of Political Economy 89, Nr. 3, Juni, 468 – 96, 1981.  Google Scholar
  26. Conrad, K. und Jorgenson, D. W.: Measuring Performance in the Private Economy of the Federal Republic of Germany 1950 – 1973. Tübingen, 1975.  Google Scholar
  27. Conrad, K.: Intertemporal General Equilibrium Modeling of German Tax Reform Proposals, Finanzarchiv 48, 194 – 221, 1990.  Google Scholar
  28. Duschek, K., Farken, T. und Rose, M.: Welfare Effects of Abolishing the German Business Tax – An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis. Heidelberger Diskussion Paper, Nr. 160, Dez. 1990.  Google Scholar
  29. Gottfried, P. und Wiegard, W.: Exemption versus Zero Rating: A Hidden Problem of VAT. Regensburger Diskussionsbeiträge zur Wirtschaftswissenschaft, Nr. 219, 1990.  Google Scholar
  30. Hall, R. E.: The Dynamic Effects of Fiscal Policy in an Economy with Foresight. Review of Economic Studies 38, Nr. 2, April, 229 – 244, 1971.  Google Scholar
  31. Hall, R. E. und Jorgenson, D. W.: Tax Policy and Investment Behavior. American Economic Review 57, Nr. 3, Juni, 391 – 414, 1967.  Google Scholar
  32. Harberger, A. C.: The Incidence of the Corporation Tax. Journal of Political Economy 70, Nr. 3, Juni, 215 – 240, 1962.  Google Scholar
  33. Harberger, A. C.: Efficiency Effects of Taxes on Income from Capital. In: Krzyzaniak, M. (ed.): Effects of Corporation Income Tax. Detroit, Wayne State Univ. Press, 1966.  Google Scholar
  34. Hirte, G. und Wiegard, W.: An Introduction to Applied General Equilibrium Tax Modelling, in: Bös, D. et al. (ed.), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics, Berlin -  Google Scholar
  35. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 1988.  Google Scholar
  36. Jorgenson, D. W.: Capital Theory and Investment Behavior. American Economic Review 53, Nr. 2, Mai, 247 – 259, 1963.  Google Scholar
  37. Jorgenson, D. W.: Modeling Production for General Equilibrium Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 85, 2, 101 – 112, 1983.  Google Scholar
  38. Jorgenson, D. W. und Yun, K.-Y.: The Efficiency of Capital Allocation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88, Nr. 1, 1986a.  Google Scholar
  39. Jorgenson, D. W. und Yun, K.-Y.: Tax Policy and Capital Allocation. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88, Nr. 2, 355 – 377, 1986b.  Google Scholar
  40. Jorgenson, D. W. und Yun, K.-Y.: Tax Reform and the Cost of Capital. Clarendon Press, Oxford 1991. – Jorgenson, D.W. und Yun, K.-Y.: Tax Reform and U.S. Economic Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 151 – 193, 1990 a.  Google Scholar
  41. Jorgenson, D. W. und Yun, K.-Y.: The Excess Burden of Taxation in the U.S. HIER Discussion Paper Nr. 1528, 1990b.  Google Scholar
  42. King, M. A. und Fullerton, D.: The Taxation of Income from Capital. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1984.  Google Scholar
  43. Kühn, B., Kungl, H., Rose, M.: Incidence Effects of Changing the German Income Tax Rate Schedule. In: Bös, D., Rose, M., Seidl, Ch. (eds.), Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics. Berlin – Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, 1988, 205 – 246.  Google Scholar
  44. Leibfritz, W.: Steuerliche Belastung und staatliche Förderung der Kapitalbildung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ifo-Studien zur Finanzpolitik, Nr. 36, 1986.  Google Scholar
  45. Leibfritz, W.: Taxation of Capital Income in the Federal Republic of Germany. Paper presented to the International Conference on the Cost of Capital at the Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Nov. 1987.  Google Scholar
  46. Sinn, H.-W.: Capital Income Taxation, Depreciation Allowances and Economic Growth: A Perfect-foresight General Equilibrium Model, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 41, Nr. 3 – 4, 295 – 305, 1981.  Google Scholar
  47. Sinn, H.-W.: Kapitaleinkommensbesteuerung. Tübingen 1985. Revised as: Capital Income Taxa- tion and Resource Allocation. Amsterdam. 1987.  Google Scholar
  48. Turnovsky, S. J.: The Incidence of Taxes: A Dynamic Macroeconomic Analysis, Journal of Public Economics 18, Nr. 2, July, 161 – 194, 1982.  Google Scholar

Abstract

The Excess Burden of Taxation: The Proposals for a Reform of Company Taxation

Since by international comparison, tax rates on capital income are rather high in Germany, a reform of company taxation would be welcome, given its present uneven incidence on individual enterprises and the pursuit of greater harmonisation of tax systems across EC countries. The purpose of this intertemporal general equilibrium model of the German economy is to analyze the impact of present German tax reform proposals on the efficiency of capital allocation and on potential welfare gains. The methodology for measuring the difference in excess burden under alternative tax systems is based on the intertemporal general eguilibrium approach employed by Jorgenson and Yun (1986) to analyze U.S. tax reform proposals. Given expenditure and budget deficit, the government should choose taxes so as to maximize social welfare. Hence, tax cut proposals to reduce the excess burden require distorting tax increases to meet the given revenue requirements. Our objective is to measure the net social gain or cost of a compensating tax system which is supposed to be less distorting. Proposals for a tax reform include a recent proposal of the tax reform comittee, tax cuts in taxes on capital income, and a reduction of the business (trade) taxes on profits and capital