Bewertung von Länderrisiken durch Optionspreismethoden
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Bewertung von Länderrisiken durch Optionspreismethoden
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 24 (1991), Iss. 4 : pp. 484–506
Additional Information
Article Details
Author Details
Martin Klein, Bonn
References
-
1. Avramovic, D., 1964, Economic Growth and External Debt, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Google Scholar -
2. Bartolini, L., und A. Dixit, 1990, Market Valuation of Illiquid Debt and Implications for Conflicts Among Creditors, IMF Working Paper WP/90/88.
Google Scholar -
3. Black, F. und M. Scholes, 1973, „The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities“, Journal of Political Economy 81, 637 - 654.
Google Scholar -
4. Claessens, S., und S. van Wijnbergen, 1990, Secondary Market Prices Under Alternative Debt Reduction Strategies: An Option Pricing Approach with an Application to Mexiko, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 415, London, UK.
Google Scholar -
5. Cohen, D., 1990, A Valuation Formula for LDC Debt With Some Applications for Debt Relief, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 460, London, UK.
Google Scholar -
6. Cox, J. C., und M. Rubinstein, 1985, Options Markets, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Google Scholar -
7. Duffie, D., 1988, Security Markets, Academic Press: Boston.
Google Scholar -
8. Eaton, J., und M. Gersovitz, 1981, „Debt with Potential Repudiation: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis“, Review of Economic Studies 48, 289 - 309.
Google Scholar -
9. Eaton, J., M. Gersovitz und J. E. Stiglitz, 1986, „The Pure Theory of Country Risk“, European Economic Review 30, 481 - 513.
Google Scholar -
10. Edwards, S., 1984, „LDC Borrowing and Default Risk: An Empirical Investigation“, American Economic Review 74, 726 - 734.
Google Scholar -
11. Feder, G., und R. Just, 1977, „A Study of Debt-Servicing Capacity Applying Logit Analysis“, Journal of Development Economics 4, 25 - 38.
Google Scholar -
12. Frank, C.R. Jr., und W. R. Cline, 1971, „Measurement of Debt Servicing Capacity: An Application of Discriminant Analysis“, Journal of International Economics, 327 - 344.
Google Scholar -
13. Heffernan, S. A., 1986, Sovereign Risk Analysis, London: Unwin Hyman.
Google Scholar -
14. Hellwig, M., 1986, „Comments: The Pure Theory of Country Risk“, European Economic Review 30, 521 -527.
Google Scholar -
15. Kharas, H., 1984, „The Long-Run Creditworthiness of Developing Countries: Theory and Practice“, Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, 415 - 439.
Google Scholar -
16. Köglmayr, H.-G., 1986, „Erfassung und Handhabung von Länderrisiken“, WiSt, Heft 4,211 - 214.
Google Scholar -
17. Köglmayr, H.-G. und S. Müller, 1987, „Bewertung von Länderrisiken“, Die Bank, Heft 7, 378 - 284.
Google Scholar -
18. Lloyd-Ellis, H., G. W. McKenzie, und S. H. Thomas, 1990, „Predicting the Quantity of LDC Debt Rescheduling“, Economics Letters 32, 67-73.
Google Scholar -
19. Maddala, G. S., 1983, Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar -
20. McDonald, D. C., 1981, „Debt Capacity and Developing Country Borrowing: A Survey ofthe Literature“, IMF Staff Papers 29, 603 - 646.
Google Scholar -
21. Merton, R., 1973, „Theory of Rational Option Pricing“, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141 - 183.
Google Scholar -
22. Müller, S., 1985, Arbitrage Pricing of Contingent Claims, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, Tokyo.
Google Scholar -
23. Rieffel, A., 1985, The Role of the Paris Club in Managing Debt Problems, Essays in International Finance No. 161, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Google Scholar -
24. Rubinstein, M., „Derivative Assets Analysis“, Economic Perspectives, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1987, 73 - 93.
Google Scholar -
25. Varian, H. R., 1987, „The Arbitrage Principle in Financial Economics“, Economic Perspectives, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1987, 55 - 72.
Google Scholar -
1. Avramovic, D., 1964, Economic Growth and External Debt, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Google Scholar -
2. Bartolini, L., und A. Dixit, 1990, Market Valuation of Illiquid Debt and Implications for Conflicts Among Creditors, IMF Working Paper WP/90/88.
Google Scholar -
3. Black, F. und M. Scholes, 1973, „The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities“, Journal of Political Economy 81, 637 – 654.
Google Scholar -
4. Claessens, S., und S. van Wijnbergen, 1990, Secondary Market Prices Under Alternative Debt Reduction Strategies: An Option Pricing Approach with an Application to Mexiko, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 415, London, UK.
Google Scholar -
5. Cohen, D., 1990, A Valuation Formula for LDC Debt With Some Applications for Debt Relief, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 460, London, UK.
Google Scholar -
6. Cox, J. C., und M. Rubinstein, 1985, Options Markets, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Google Scholar -
7. Duffie, D., 1988, Security Markets, Academic Press: Boston.
Google Scholar -
8. Eaton, J., und M. Gersovitz, 1981, „Debt with Potential Repudiation: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis“, Review of Economic Studies 48, 289 – 309.
Google Scholar -
9. Eaton, J., M. Gersovitz und J. E. Stiglitz, 1986, „The Pure Theory of Country Risk“, European Economic Review 30, 481 – 513.
Google Scholar -
10. Edwards, S., 1984, „LDC Borrowing and Default Risk: An Empirical Investigation“, American Economic Review 74, 726 – 734.
Google Scholar -
11. Feder, G., und R. Just, 1977, „A Study of Debt-Servicing Capacity Applying Logit Analysis“, Journal of Development Economics 4, 25 – 38.
Google Scholar -
12. Frank, C.R. Jr., und W. R. Cline, 1971, „Measurement of Debt Servicing Capacity: An Application of Discriminant Analysis“, Journal of International Economics, 327 – 344.
Google Scholar -
13. Heffernan, S. A., 1986, Sovereign Risk Analysis, London: Unwin Hyman.
Google Scholar -
14. Hellwig, M., 1986, „Comments: The Pure Theory of Country Risk“, European Economic Review 30, 521 -527.
Google Scholar -
15. Kharas, H., 1984, „The Long-Run Creditworthiness of Developing Countries: Theory and Practice“, Quarterly Journal of Economics 99, 415 – 439.
Google Scholar -
16. Köglmayr, H.-G., 1986, „Erfassung und Handhabung von Länderrisiken“, WiSt, Heft 4,211 – 214.
Google Scholar -
17. Köglmayr, H.-G. und S. Müller, 1987, „Bewertung von Länderrisiken“, Die Bank, Heft 7, 378 – 284.
Google Scholar -
18. Lloyd-Ellis, H., G. W. McKenzie, und S. H. Thomas, 1990, „Predicting the Quantity of LDC Debt Rescheduling“, Economics Letters 32, 67-73.
Google Scholar -
19. Maddala, G. S., 1983, Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar -
20. McDonald, D. C., 1981, „Debt Capacity and Developing Country Borrowing: A Survey ofthe Literature“, IMF Staff Papers 29, 603 – 646.
Google Scholar -
21. Merton, R., 1973, „Theory of Rational Option Pricing“, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 4, 141 – 183.
Google Scholar -
22. Müller, S., 1985, Arbitrage Pricing of Contingent Claims, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, New York, Tokyo.
Google Scholar -
23. Rieffel, A., 1985, The Role of the Paris Club in Managing Debt Problems, Essays in International Finance No. 161, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Google Scholar -
24. Rubinstein, M., „Derivative Assets Analysis“, Economic Perspectives, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1987, 73 – 93.
Google Scholar -
25. Varian, H. R., 1987, „The Arbitrage Principle in Financial Economics“, Economic Perspectives, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1987, 55 – 72.
Google Scholar
Abstract
Evaluation of Country Risks by Means of Option Price Methods
The aim of this contribution is to preesent an option price model for the determination of spreads (interest premiums) in the case of lendings to foreign governments. The starting point is a stylized model for the tying-up of debt rescheduling packages. This model allows the determination of the market value of a country’s foreign debts by means of option price theory-methods. Conceptually, this approach is based on the question as to what amount of insurance premium a lender would be prepared to pay in order to be able to move out of any lending to a foreign government at par. Such amount of insurance premium subsequently allows the spread to be estimated for a lending transaction under which the lender does not have or does not use the possibility of moving out at par. This contribution ends on a discussion of the question as to whether and, if so, to what extent the described model is capable of furnishing results that are relevant for practical financial management purposes and useful in quantitative terms