Menu Expand

Zur Frage der normativen Interpretation von Leistungsbilanzsalden

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Issing, O., Masuch, K. Zur Frage der normativen Interpretation von Leistungsbilanzsalden. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 22(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.1.1
Issing, Otmar and Masuch, Klaus "Zur Frage der normativen Interpretation von Leistungsbilanzsalden" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 22.1, 1989, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.1.1
Issing, Otmar/Masuch, Klaus (1989): Zur Frage der normativen Interpretation von Leistungsbilanzsalden, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 22, iss. 1, 1-17, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.1.1

Format

Zur Frage der normativen Interpretation von Leistungsbilanzsalden

Issing, Otmar | Masuch, Klaus

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 22 (1989), Iss. 1 : pp. 1–17

4 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Otmar Issing, Würzburg

Klaus Masuch, Würzburg

Cited By

  1. Der Delors-Plan und die Anforderungen an eine gemeinsame Europäische Geldpolitik

    Willms, Manfred

    Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 23 (1990), Iss. 1 P.30

    https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.23.1.30 [Citations: 1]
  2. Anmerkungen zur normativen Interpretation von Leistungsbilanzsalden

    Schröder, Wolfgang

    Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 22 (1989), Iss. 4 P.508

    https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.4.508 [Citations: 1]
  3. Leistungsbilanzsalden und Wirtschaftspolitik

    Issing, Otmar | Masuch, Klaus

    Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 23 (1990), Iss. 1 P.121

    https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.23.1.121 [Citations: 0]
  4. Die Berechenbarkeit der Politik

    Rübel, Gerhard

    Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 22 (1989), Iss. 4 P.520

    https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.4.520 [Citations: 1]

References

  1. Bergsten, Fred C.: "Resolving the Global Economic Crisis: After Wall Street, A Statement by thirty-three Economists from thirteen Countries". Institute for International Economics, Washington D. C. 1987.  Google Scholar
  2. Crockett, Andrew and Morris Goldstein: Strengthening the International Monetary System: Exchange Rates, Surveillance, and Objective Indicators. International Monetary Fund, Occasional Paper No. 50, Washington D. C., 1987.  Google Scholar
  3. Frenkel, Jacob A. and Assaf Razin: "Government Spending, Debt, and International Economic Interdependence". The Economic Journal, Vol. 95,1985, S. 619 - 636.  Google Scholar
  4. Frenkel, Jacob A. and Assaf Razin (1986 a): "Fiscal Policies in the World Economy". Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94,1986, S. 564 - 594.  Google Scholar
  5. Frenkel, Jacob A. and Assaf Razin (1986 b): "The International Transmission and Effects of Fiscal Policies". The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 76 No. 2,1986, S. 330 - 335.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Questions Relating to the Normative Interpretation of Current Balance Data

An intertemporal approach to analyzing current balance data initially shows what combinations of fundamental factors, i.e. intertemporal utility and production functions of individual countries, are at the base of current balance surpluses/deficits. According to this approach, surpluses and deficits reflect intertemporal optimization. Under this aspect, the inevitable conclusion is that redressing current account imbalances invariably leads to prosperity losses.

However, any reality-based analysis must take account of adjustment costs and uncertainties as well as of varied distortions on account of taxes, subsidies an regulations; all of them may influence current balances and be at the base of surpluses/ deficits besides fundamental factors.

It would, however, be inappropriate to conclude from the existence of such factors that it would be a matter of political prudence to postulate and pursue the attainment of current balance targets. Prosperity gains can in this way not be made especially when the aim is a general lumpsum reduction of surpluses/deficits without any thorough analysis of the determinants of existing current balance surpluses/deficits.

Moreover, stability policy requirements suggest entirely different optimal current account results depending on whether production and employment fluctuations are caused by supply or by demand conditions. Finally, the implementation of a policy guided by current balance targets would meet with a substantial amount of difficulty, too; from among the possible effects thereof, mention must be made primarily of increasing protectionism and rises in publicsector debts.