Menu Expand

Staatsschuldenarithmetik: Zwei unerfreuliche Beispiele

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Amann, E., Jäger, A. Staatsschuldenarithmetik: Zwei unerfreuliche Beispiele. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 22(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.2.221
Amann, Erwin and Jäger, Albert "Staatsschuldenarithmetik: Zwei unerfreuliche Beispiele" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 22.2, 1989, 221-234. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.2.221
Amann, Erwin/Jäger, Albert (1989): Staatsschuldenarithmetik: Zwei unerfreuliche Beispiele, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 22, iss. 2, 221-234, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.2.221

Format

Staatsschuldenarithmetik: Zwei unerfreuliche Beispiele

Amann, Erwin | Jäger, Albert

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 22 (1989), Iss. 2 : pp. 221–234

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Erwin Amann, Wien

Albert Jäger, Wien

References

  1. Bisham, J. A. (1987): Rising Public-Sector Indebtness: Some More Unpleasant Arithmetic; in: Boskin, Michael J., Flemming, J. F. und Gorini, Stefano (eds.), Private Saving and Public Debt, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.  Google Scholar
  2. Blanchard, Olivier (1984): Current and Anticipated Deficits, Interest Rates and Economic Activity; European Economic Review 25, S. 7 - 27.  Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, Olivier (1985): Debt, Deficits and Finite Horizons; Journal of Political Economy 93, S. 223 - 47.  Google Scholar
  4. Buiter, Willem H. (1985): A Guide to Public Sector Debt and Deficits; Economic Policy, November 1985, 1, S. 14 - 79.  Google Scholar
  5. Chouraqui, Jean-Claude, Jones, Brian und Montador, Robert Bruce (1986): Public Debt in a Medium-Term Perspective; OECD Economic Studies 7, Autumn, S. 103 - 153.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Public Debt Arithmetic: Two Unpleasant Examples

If real interest rates remain above real growth rates of output in the long run, the current fiscal policy stance in many countries will become unsustainable. The required policies for handling this situation face the following dilemma: Primary deficits (= deficits excluding interest payments) must be adjusted to preclude an explosive development of the debt-income ratio. The more rapid this adjustment is executed, the lower will be the necessary primary budget surplus that guarantees sustainability of the debt-income ratio in the long run. But rapid adjustment will imply high short-run costs in terms of output and employment losses. Slow adjustment implies, however, that the long-run surplus has to be higher than in the case of rapid adjustment. Moreover, a slow adjustment strategy might entail other costs as well, if, e.g. real interest rates increase in response to the expected higher future debt-income ratios. This paper discusses two models intended to illustrate the dilemma. In the first model, we assume an exogenous maximum for the primary budget surplus sustainable in the long run. This model is suited to illustrate the relationship between the speed of adjusting the deficit, the solvency of the sovereign and the sustainable long run budget surplus. The second model introduces a “vicious circle” element into the model by linking the real interest rate to future budget deficits. One implication of the second model is that the long run sustainable debt-income ratio is bounded from above without introducing an exogenous upper bound for deficits as in the first model.