Menu Expand

Current Substitition and Money Demand in the United States, West Germany and Japan

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Baade, R., Nazmi, N. Current Substitition and Money Demand in the United States, West Germany and Japan. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 22(3), 363-374. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.3.363
Baade, Robert A. and Nazmi, Nader "Current Substitition and Money Demand in the United States, West Germany and Japan" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 22.3, 1989, 363-374. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.3.363
Baade, Robert A./Nazmi, Nader (1989): Current Substitition and Money Demand in the United States, West Germany and Japan, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 22, iss. 3, 363-374, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.22.3.363

Format

Current Substitition and Money Demand in the United States, West Germany and Japan

Baade, Robert A. | Nazmi, Nader

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 22 (1989), Iss. 3 : pp. 363–374

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Robert A. Baade, Lake Forest/Ill.

Nader Nazmi, Lake Forest/Ill.

References

  1. Akhtar, M. A. and Putnam, Bluford H. (1979): “Exchange Risk and the Demand for Money in Germany, 1972 – 76.” Unpublished Mimeograph.  Google Scholar
  2. Baade, Robert A. (1985): “An Investigation of the Nexus Between Floating Exchange Rates and Economic Instability.” Paper presented at the Eastern Economic Association Meetings, Pittsburgh, PA. March 21 – 23.  Google Scholar
  3. Batten, Dallas S. and Hafer, R. W. (1984): “Currency Substitution: A Test of Its Importance.” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. August/September. 66.6 – 11.  Google Scholar
  4. Bell, W.R. and Hillmer, S. C. (1984): “Issues Involved With the Seasonal Adjustment of Economic Time Series.” October, pp. 291 – 320.  Google Scholar
  5. Brittain, Bruce (1981): “International Currency Substitution, and the Apparent Instability of Velocity in Some European Economies and the United States.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. May, 13. 135 – 155.  Google Scholar
  6. Chen, C.-N. (1973): “Diversified Currency Holdings and Flexible Exchange Rates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. February, 87. 96 – 111.  Google Scholar
  7. Enzler, Jared, Johnson, Lewis, and Paulus, John (1976: 1): “Some Problems of Money Demand.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 261 -280.  Google Scholar
  8. Garcia, Gillian and Pak, Simon (1979): “Some Clues in the Case of the Missing Money.” American Economic Review. May, 69 (2). 330 – 334.  Google Scholar
  9. Goldfeld, Stephen M. (1976: 3): “The Case of the Missing Money.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 683 – 730.  Google Scholar
  10. Goldfeld, Stephen M. (1973: 3): “The Demand for Money Revisited.” rookings Papers on Economic Activity. 577 – 638.  Google Scholar
  11. Goldstein, Henry N. and Haynes, Stephen E. (1974): “A Critical Appraisal of McKinnon’s World Money Supply ypothesis.” The American Economic Review. March 74. 217 – 226.  Google Scholar
  12. Hafer, R. W. and ein, Scott E. (1982): “The Shift in Money Demand: What Really Happened?” Federal eserve Bank of St. Louis Review. February, 11 – 15.  Google Scholar
  13. Hamburger, Michael J. (1977): “Behavior of the Money Stock: Is There a Puzzle?” Journal of Monetary Economics. 65 – 288.  Google Scholar
  14. Hetzel, Robert. L. and Mehra, Yash. (1986): “U.S. Inflation and the Real Rate.” Paper presented at the Western Economic Association Meetings in Sa Francisco, CA. July.  Google Scholar
  15. Hildreth, G. and Lu, J. Y. (1960): “Demand Relations with Autocorrelated Disturbances,” Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Bulletin 276, November.  Google Scholar
  16. Laidler, David E. (1985): The Demand for Money: Theories, Evidence, and Problems. New York: Harper and Row, Publishers, Inc.  Google Scholar
  17. Lieberman, Charles (1979): “Structural and Technological Change in Money Demand.” American Economic Review. May, 324 – 329.  Google Scholar
  18. McKinnon, Ronald I. (1984): An International Standard for Monetary Stabilization. Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics.  Google Scholar
  19. McKinnon, Ronald I. (1982): “Currency Substitution and Instability in the World Dollar Standard.” American Economic Review. June, 72. 320-333.  Google Scholar
  20. Miles, Marc A. (1978): “Currency Substitution, Flexible Exchange Rates, and Monetary Independence.” American Economic Review. June, 68, 428 – 436.  Google Scholar
  21. Porter, Richard D., Simpson, Thomas D., and Mauskopf, Eileen (1979): “Financial Innovation and the Monetary Aggregates.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 213 – 228.  Google Scholar
  22. Radcliffe, Christopher, Warga, Arthur D., and Willett, Thomas D. (1984): “Currency Substitution and Instability in the World Dollar Standard: Comment.” The American Economic Review. December, 1129 – 1131.  Google Scholar
  23. Rose,, Andrew R. (1985): “An Alternative Approach to the American Demand for Money.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. November, 439 – 455.  Google Scholar
  24. Spencer, B. G. (1975): “The Small Sample Bias of Durbin’s Tests for Serial Correlation When One of the Regressions is the Lagged Dependent Variable and the Null Hyposthesis is True.” Journal of Econometrics, August, pp. 249 – 254.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Currency Substitution and Money Demand in the United States, West Germany and Japan

Money demand equations for the United States that predicted well during the late 1950s and throughout the 19605 began to significantly overpredict money demand in 1974. This “missing money” puzzle inspired a myriad of explanations. Since the adoption of floating exchange rates coincided with dollar demand overpredictions, one explanation has focused on a growing tendency to substitute other currencies for dollars in international portfolios. The purpose of this paper is to test the currency substitution thesis. The authors concluded that while there was a structural shift in the demand for money, perhaps induced by currency substitution among countries analyzed, currency substitution at best only partially explains dollar overpredictions.