Menu Expand

Keynes als Kapitaltheoretiker

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Riese, H. Keynes als Kapitaltheoretiker. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 20(2), 153-178. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.20.2.153
Riese, Hajo "Keynes als Kapitaltheoretiker" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 20.2, 1987, 153-178. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.20.2.153
Riese, Hajo (1987): Keynes als Kapitaltheoretiker, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 20, iss. 2, 153-178, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.20.2.153

Format

Keynes als Kapitaltheoretiker

Riese, Hajo

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 20 (1987), Iss. 2 : pp. 153–178

3 Citations (CrossRef)

Additional Information

Article Details

Author Details

Hajo Riese, Berlin

Cited By

  1. "El Capital” y el keynesianismo monetario

    Betz, Karl

    Ensayos de Economía, Vol. 28 (2018), Iss. 52 P.231

    https://doi.org/10.15446/ede.v28n52.72513 [Citations: 0]
  2. Monetäre Voraussetzungen marktwirtschaftlicher Reformschritte in den Staaten Osteuropas

    Filc, Wolfgang | Winkler, Adalbert

    Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 24 (1991), Iss. 2 P.175

    https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.24.2.175 [Citations: 0]
  3. "El Capital” y el keynesianismo monetario

    Betz, Karl

    Ensayos de Economía, Vol. 28 (2018), Iss. 52 P.231

    https://doi.org/10.15446/ede.v28n52.72513 [Citations: 0]

References

  1. Bliss, C.J. (1975): Capital Theory and the Distribution of Income. Amsterdam Oxford.  Google Scholar
  2. Clower, R. (1965): deutsch (1963), Die Keynesianische Gegenrevolution: eine theoretische Kritik. „Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik“, 99, S. 8 – 31.  Google Scholar
  3. Davidson, P. (1972), 2 (1978): Money and the Real World. London and Basingstoke.  Google Scholar
  4. Davidson, P. (1980): The Dual-faceted Nature of the Keynesian Revolution: Money and Money Wages in Unemployment and Production Flow Prices. „Journal of Post Keynesian Economics“, 3, S. 291 – 307.  Google Scholar
  5. Davidson, P. (1981): deutsch (1984a), Die Postkeynesianische Wirtschaftswissenschaft: Die Lösung der Krise in der Wirtschaftstheorie. In: D. Bell und I. Kristol (Hrsg.), Die Krise in der Wirtschaftstheorie. Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, S. 190 – 217.  Google Scholar
  6. Davidson, P. (1984b): Reviving Keynes’s Revolution. „Journal of Post Keynesian Economics“, 6, S. 561 – 575.  Google Scholar
  7. Fisher, J. (1930): deutsch (1932), Die Zinstheorie. Jena.  Google Scholar
  8. Keynes, J.M. (1936): deutsch (1936), Allgemeine Theorie der Beschäftigung, des Zinses und des Geldes. Berlin.  Google Scholar
  9. Kregel, J. A. (1976): Economic Methodology in the Face of Uncertainty: The Modelling Methods of Keynes and the Post-Keynesians. „The Economic Journal“, 86, S. 209 – 225.  Google Scholar
  10. Lakatos, I. (1970): deutsch (1974), Falsifikation und die Methodologie wissenschaftlicher Forschungsprogramme. In: I. Lakatos und R.A. Musgrave (Hrsg.), Kritik und Erkenntnisfortschritt. Braunschweig, S. 89 – 189.  Google Scholar
  11. Malinvaud, E. (1977): The Theory o£ Unemployment Reconsidered. New York.  Google Scholar
  12. Minsky, H.P. (1975): John Maynard Keynes. London and Basingstoke. – Patinkin, D. (1956), 2 (1965): Money, Interest, and Prices. New York.  Google Scholar
  13. Robinson, J. (1956): The Accumulation of Capital. London.  Google Scholar
  14. Spahn, H.-P. (1986): Stagnation – Theorie und Politik aus keynesianischer Sicht. Frankfurt am Main.  Google Scholar
  15. Sraffa, P. (1960): deutsch (1976), Warenproduktion mittels Waren. Frankfurt am Main.  Google Scholar

Abstract

Keynes as a Capital Theorist

As a critical evaluation of the Keynesian fundamentalism – whose protagonists understand themselves as post-Keynesians – this essay discusses the demands to be met by a Keynesian-type economy formulating a monetary production theory. The principle underlying such Keynesian-type economy – by which it distinguishes itself from the classical and neoclassical theory of value – is that money forms the market system’s restriction on budgets – the unity of wealth, commodity and labour markets -- and that, as a consequence, money interest becomes the market system’s general scarcity-induced price. This means that the interest rate is explained in terms of liquidity preference; it functions as the price of giving up liquidity, but not – as distinct from the orthodox line of thinking – the price of non-consumption. In this context, the monetary character of production presupposes that capital, too, represents a form of giving up liquidity with the rate of return being a kind of money interest. However, the Keynesian fundamentalism closes its eyes on this insight by deriving the rate of return from the nature of capital as a means of production and interpreting it as a quasi-rent. By doing so, this fundamentalism just covers the effects of the liquidity preference which makes the interest rate a barrier standing in the way toward full employment, while ignoring that the liquidity preference keeps capital scarce thus enabling a profit to be made. A monetary theory of production that is conclusive in itself thus shows that the limitation of production and the generation of profits are just the two sides of one medal. Contrary to the views of the Keynesian fundamentalism, the liquidity preference does, however, not cause any market failure preventing full employment which may be counteracted by a policy of low interest. It rather reflects the principle at the base of a money economy presupposing excess supply and involving a trend toward underemployment as a consequence