Vermögensrestriktion, Budgetrestriktionen, Wirkungen der Staatsverschuldung und die Budget-Multiplikatoren von Dieter Cansier
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE
Style
Format
Vermögensrestriktion, Budgetrestriktionen, Wirkungen der Staatsverschuldung und die Budget-Multiplikatoren von Dieter Cansier
Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 16 (1983), Iss. 1 : pp. 36–53
1 Citations (CrossRef)
Additional Information
Article Details
Scheele, Erwin
Cited By
-
Perioden-Gleichgewicht und zeitliche Entwicklung in einem IS/LM-Modell mit Finanzierungsrestriktion der Investitionen und Bilanzrestriktion der Unternehmen
Scheele, Erwin
Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 104 (1984), Iss. 4 P.339
https://doi.org/10.3790/schm.104.4.339 [Citations: 1]
References
-
Blinder, A. and Solow, R. (1973): Does Fiscal Policy Matter? Journal of Public Economics 2/1973, 319 - 337.
Google Scholar -
Cansier, D. (1981): Vermögenseffekte der Staatsverschuldung -Multiplikatorwirkungen und Implikationen für den „konjunkturneutralen öffentlichen Haushalt“, Kredit und Kapital 14/1981, S. 390 - 411.
Google Scholar -
Christ, C. (1968): A Simple Macroeconomic Model with a Government Budget Restraint, Journal of Political Economy 76/1968, 53 - 67.
Google Scholar -
Christ, C. (1978): Some Dynamic Theory of Macroeconomic Policy Effects on Income and Prices under the Government Budget Constraint, ‚Journal of Monetary Economics 4/1978, 45 - 70.
Google Scholar -
Cohen, D. and de Leeuw, F. (1980): A Note on the Government Budget Restraint, Journal of Monetary Economics 6/1980, 547 - 560.
Google Scholar -
Cohen, D. and McMenamin, St. (1978): The Role of Fiscal Policy in a Financially Disaggregated Macroeconomic Model, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 10/1978, 322 - 336.
Google Scholar -
Heubes, J. (1980): Does Fiscal Policy Matter? Einige Anmerkungen zu dem gleichnamigen Artikel von A.S. Blinder und R.M.Solow, Finanzarchiv 38/1980, 416 - 423.
Google Scholar -
Feldstein, M. (1980): Fiscal Policies, Inflation, and Capital Formation, American Economic Review 70/1980, 636 - 650.
Google Scholar -
Fuhrmann, W. (1980): Das Realkapital im keynesianischen gesamtwirtschaftlichen Modell, Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 100/1980, S. 19 - 29.
Google Scholar -
Infante, E. and Stein, J. (1980): Money-Financed Fiscal Policy in a Growing Economy, Journal of Political Economy 88/1980, 259 - 287.
Google Scholar -
Jarchow, H., und Engel, G. (1981): Fiskal- und geldpolitische Impact-Effekte im Vergleich von diskreter und stetiger Analyse, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 137/1981, S. 128 - 133.
Google Scholar -
Siebke, J. (1977): Der „crowding-out effekt“ in einem Portfolio-Makromodell, in Albach, H., Helmstädter, E. und Henn, R. (Hrsg.): Quantitative Wirtschaftsforschung, Tübingen 1977, S. 655 - 662.
Google Scholar -
Takayama, A. (1980): Does Monetary Policy Matter? Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staats-‚wissenschaft 136/1980, S. 593 - 616.
Google Scholar -
Tobin, J. (1969): A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1/1969, 15 - 29.
Google Scholar -
Tobin, J. and Buiter, W. (1976): Long-Run Effects of Fiscal and Monetary Policy on Aggregate Demand, Stein, J. E. (ed.): Monetarism, Amsterdam (etc.) 1976, 273 - 309.
Google Scholar -
Turnovsky, St. (1978): Macroeconomic Dynamics and Growth in a Monetary Economy, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 10/1978, 1 - 26.
Google Scholar
Abstract
Wealth Restriction, Budget Restriction, Effects of Public Debt and D. Cansier’s Budget Multipliers
On the basis of a Blinder/Solow-type model, the first part (a) discusses the features which should be exhibited by a theoretical basis for the monetarism-Keynesianism debate, (b) outlines the problems which can be analysed meaningfully with such a model, and (c) proposes supplementations which alone make it suitable for dealing with certain issues in that debate. Special attention is given to the application of Walras’s law and the problem of assessing investments as a component of output on the one hand and of the stock of capital on the other. It is shown, inter alia, that models of the type mentioned (1) must be closed, so that authors who, making reference to Walras, operate with one degree of freedom, are investigating something quite different than they believe, (2) must be extended to permit analysis of openmarket- policy, (3) give absurd results when Christ’s equilibrium condition is introduced. In the second part, using an essay by Cansier as an example, it is shown what misunderstandings ensue, if the minimal requirements developed for the model in the first part are disregarded, that model being taken as a basis for examining the effects of public debt.