Menu Expand

Cite JOURNAL ARTICLE

Style

Allsbrook, O., Gilliam, K. An Industrial Interpretation of Inflationary Unemployment. Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, 16(4), 479-487. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.16.4.479
Allsbrook, Ogden O. and Gilliam, Kenneth P. "An Industrial Interpretation of Inflationary Unemployment" Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital 16.4, 1983, 479-487. https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.16.4.479
Allsbrook, Ogden O./Gilliam, Kenneth P. (1983): An Industrial Interpretation of Inflationary Unemployment, in: Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, vol. 16, iss. 4, 479-487, [online] https://doi.org/10.3790/ccm.16.4.479

Format

An Industrial Interpretation of Inflationary Unemployment

Allsbrook, Ogden O. | Gilliam, Kenneth P.

Credit and Capital Markets – Kredit und Kapital, Vol. 16 (1983), Iss. 4 : pp. 479–487

Additional Information

Article Details

Allsbrook, Ogden O.

Gilliam, Kenneth P.

References

  1. Adelman, Morris A.: “Change in Industrial Concentration,” in Mansfield, E. (ed.), Monopoly Power and Economic Performance, W. W. Norton, New York, 1978.  Google Scholar
  2. Alchian, Armen A.: “Information on Costs, Pricing, and Resource Unemployment,” ‚in Phelps, E. (ed.), Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory, W. W. Norton, New York, 1970.  Google Scholar
  3. Allsbrook, Ogden O.: “Keynes’s Involuntary Unemployment Equilibrium: An Alternative View,” South African Journal of Economics, March 1973, 41, pp. 60 - 66.  Google Scholar
  4. Coddington, Alan: “Hick’s Contribution to Keynesian Economics,” Journal of Economic Literature, September 1979, 17, pp. 970 - 88.  Google Scholar
  5. Dean, James W.: “The Inflation Process: Where Conventional Theory Falters,” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, May 1981, 71, pp. 362 - 67.  Google Scholar
  6. Friedman, Milton: Price Theory: A Provisional Text, Revised Edition, Aldine, Chicago, 1975.  Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, Milton: “Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment,” Journal of Political Economy, June 1977, 85, pp. 451 - 72.  Google Scholar
  8. Hicks, John R.: Value and Capital, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1946.  Google Scholar
  9. Kaldor, Nicholas and Silverman, R.: A Statistical Analysis of Advertising Expenditures and of the Revenues of the Press, Cambridge University Press.  Google Scholar
  10. Lipsey, Richard, G.: An Introduction to Positive Economics, Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, 1971.  Google Scholar
  11. Mullineaux, Donald J.: “Inflation Expectations and Money Growth in the U.S.,” American Economic Review, March 1980, 70, pp. 149 - 61.  Google Scholar
  12. Reid, Gavin C.: “An Analysis of the Firm,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, February 1979, 26, pp. 15 - 32.  Google Scholar
  13. Robinson, Joan: “Imperfect Competition’ Revisited,” in Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, Volume Two, Blackwell, Oxford, 1964.  Google Scholar
  14. Robinson, Joan: “Imperfect Competition’ Today,” in Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, Volume Two, Blackwell, Oxford, 1964.  Google Scholar
  15. Smith, Warren L.: “Graphical Exposition of the Complete Keynesian System,” The Southern Economic Journal, October 1956, 23, pp. 115-25.  Google Scholar
  16. Tobin, James: “Inflation and Unemployment,” in Tobin (ed.), Essays in Economics, Volume Two, American Elsevier, New York, 1964.  Google Scholar

Abstract

An Industrial Interpretation of Inflationary Unemployment

This paper advances the hypothesis that recurring business cycles may spawn increasingly severe phases of concurrent inflation and recession. The model employed is the Keynes-Hicks-Hansen-Smith paradigm. By including the pricing and output behavior of firms which become gradually more monopolistically competitive as business cycles unfold, a case is made for increasingly severe output restriction, via advertising, and subsequently increasingly higher price levels during successive recessions. Evidence now exists that this hypothesis is tenable. In one study, the average surviving firm during recession gained approximately half a percent of market share compared to more than double that for a surviving firm which increased advertising costs by 28% or more.